Only seven people this century have been killed by the great : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 14:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Only seven people this century have been killed by the great

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 84
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 215 [5] , given: 29

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2012, 23:05
5
KUDOS
40
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

52% (01:24) correct 48% (00:26) wrong based on 1347 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those
B. movies—fewer than have been
C. movies, which is less than those
D. movies, a number lower than the people
E. movies, fewer than the ones
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3640
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 716

Kudos [?]: 5584 [11] , given: 322

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2012, 09:51
11
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In this case, B is the choice purely because of //ism between have been killed by the great white shark and fewer than have been killed by bee stings. Hence, those killed in A and C or the people killed in D and the ones killed in E are not structurally parallel to have been killed. In B, which really means fewer than those who have been killed, the phrase -those who - remains elliptic and understood.

Let us not confuse that some numbers are being compared here. People, the victims of GWS are being compared with people, the victims of the bee sting. E is additionally wrong in denigrating people as fewer than the ones; it should say fewer than who or those.

_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [6] , given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2012, 01:16
6
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
have been killed vs killed. Not parallel.
Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [4] , given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2012, 23:44
4
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those

Problem one - Less is normally used for uncountable things. People is countable. This kills C as well.
Even while using less than, verb forms should be parallel. Have been killed is not parallel to killed. Kills D and E

B. movies—fewer than have been
Perfect.
C. movies, which is less than those
Less than used again. Verb form not parallel.
D. movies, a number lower than the people
Lower is does not mean less. Lower is more closer to shorter/smaller.
E. movies, fewer than the ones
Verb form error.
Manager
Joined: 20 Aug 2012
Posts: 73
Schools: Jones '15
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [3] , given: 5

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2012, 06:28
3
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those people are countable, less is used for non-countable things - INCORRECT!!
B. movies—fewer than have been CORRECT!!!
C. movies, which is less than thoseless should not be used for countable things - INCORRECT!!
D. movies, a number lower than the peoplenumber should not be compared with people - INCORRECT!!
E. movies, fewer than the onescomma makes this modifier, fewer than the pones seems to modify movies - INCORRECT!!

Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 647
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 47

Kudos [?]: 549 [2] , given: 23

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2012, 20:34
2
KUDOS
anon1 wrote:
I don't understand why "less' can't be used with people.

I don't consider people a count noun.

We don't say "peoples"

My definition of a "count noun" is a noun that can be plural by adding an S. Like Bottle. There are 5 water bottles here. Am I wrong?

For example, wine is non-count. How much less wine do you want?

I guess we do say, there are "5 people" here... but no S at the end.

Can someone chime in ?

So going by this logic, would you consider 'fish' as countable or uncountable? you can surely count fish but cant add S at the end (or if you do, it would be a blunder )
I think MGMAT's strategy with this is best: just see if counting 1 , 2, 3 etc makes sense with it. eg. 1 bottle , 2 bottles, 3 bottles etc. or 1 fish, 2 fish, 3 fish.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [1] , given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2012, 23:56
1
KUDOS
You are not looking for a perfect answer. Just the one that is not wrong.
Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [1] , given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2012, 00:31
1
KUDOS
Its not wrong just because it doesn't 'sound' right. Use the grammar rules. Other four are definitely wrong.
Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [1] , given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2012, 00:51
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hyphen can be used as a comma. If you are referring to the holy grail (read Manhattan SC), you would find it right there.
VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1123
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 181

Kudos [?]: 1967 [1] , given: 219

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2013, 05:08
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
ankurgupta03 wrote:
Can someone throw some light on why E is wrong and when to use the touch rule of modifier ...

There is a verb tense error in E

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.

B. movies—fewer than have been (killed)
E. movies, fewer than the ones (killed)

The touching rule is used for noun-modifiers and has only few exceptions:
1)parallel structure like
noun, which(touches the noun) .... and which (does not touch the noun, but is in a parallel structure)
2)noun with modifiers or prepositional phrases like
the car of the year (prep phrase) that won the championship(refers to the car even if it touches the noun "year")

At the moment I cannot remember any other case... hope this answers your question!
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 81
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 09-30-2012
GPA: 3.08
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 8

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2012, 23:52
ShalabhAr wrote:
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.
A. movies—less than those

Problem one - Less is normally used for uncountable things. People is countable. This kills C as well.
Even while using less than, verb forms should be parallel. Have been killed is not parallel to killed. Kills D and E

B. movies—fewer than have been
Perfect.
C. movies, which is less than those
Less than used again. Verb form not parallel.
D. movies, a number lower than the people
Lower is does not mean less. Lower is more closer to shorter/smaller.
E. movies, fewer than the ones
Verb form error.

in B should it not be fewer than those who have been killed by bee sting
Intern
Joined: 08 Jun 2012
Posts: 37
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2012, 00:01
Even i have a doubt on this one :

Is "fewer than have been" correct ??
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2012, 00:49
When should be use hyphen "-"? I think comma is needed after movies. Please exlpain.
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 81
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 09-30-2012
GPA: 3.08
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 8

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2012, 01:08
ShalabhAr wrote:
Hyphen can be used as a comma. If you are referring to the holy grail (read Manhattan SC), you would find it right there.

Why is E wrong ? what verb form error ??

Hyphen can be used as anything! colon, semi colon, comma etc.
Intern
Joined: 08 Jun 2012
Posts: 37
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2012, 07:04
ShalabhAr wrote:
Its not wrong just because it doesn't 'sound' right. Use the grammar rules. Other four are definitely wrong.

so you mean to say that the phrase "fewer than have been" is grammatically correct ??
Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 4

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2012, 07:54
Well, what's wrong with it? Verb form parallel, fewer usage apt. The only problem you have in it is a missing pronoun. Right? Its more concise than you prefer I guess but still is correct.

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 12 Jun 2012
Posts: 37
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2012, 16:37
I was thinking the coma signal whatever after it is a modifying phrase. "movies" was before the coma so it's modifying phrase was modifying movies, which is incorrect.
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 138
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 97

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2012, 21:37
im still vvondering vvhat is the right reasoning to this

B seems vvierd
Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2012
Posts: 67
Schools: Tepper '15 (WL)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 7

Re: less than those killed by bee stings [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2012, 09:28
I don't agree with B for the same aforementioned reasons. Regardless if it "sounds" incorrect, you are saying that the number is fewer than...what?
Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Posts: 150
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 17

Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2012, 20:37
I don't understand why "less' can't be used with people.

I don't consider people a count noun.

We don't say "peoples"

My definition of a "count noun" is a noun that can be plural by adding an S. Like Bottle. There are 5 water bottles here. Am I wrong?

For example, wine is non-count. How much less wine do you want?

I guess we do say, there are "5 people" here... but no S at the end.

Can someone chime in ?
Re: Only seven people this century have been killed by the great   [#permalink] 26 Nov 2012, 20:37

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 30 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
38 Only seven people this century have been killed by the great 37 25 Oct 2008, 15:43
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great 10 20 Apr 2008, 10:33
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great 12 11 Oct 2007, 07:54
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great 5 22 Apr 2007, 23:51
Only seven people this century have been killed by the great 10 27 Mar 2007, 09:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by