Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Dec 2014, 09:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1377
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 10

Reviews Badge
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2008, 17:49
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:25) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts
argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not
harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each
persons decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in thefront seat.

C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.


In A and C , the passenger is denied the right to make a choice. So how come choices A and C not weaken the conclusion?

(In case you want to know the other choices ,below is the list of answer choices.

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in thefront seat.

B. Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need topay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.

C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.

D. The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws isgreater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.

E. In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts areinjured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.
)

Last edited by goalsnr on 15 Jul 2008, 06:27, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 277
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Re: CR -risk [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2008, 18:20
goalsnr wrote:
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts
argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not
harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each
persons decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in thefront seat.

C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.


In A and C , the passenger is denied the right to make a choice. So how come choices A and C weaken the conclusion?

(In case you want to know the other choices ,below is the list of answer choices.

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in thefront seat.

B. Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need topay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.

C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.

D. The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws isgreater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.

E. In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts areinjured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.
)


Not too sure about A, but my money is on C

Reason :Consider this exampler

X and Y travel together in a car, X does not wear a seat belt but is driving the car, Y(per her choice) does not wear the seatbelt as well. The car is involved in an accident due to X's careless driving. The conclusion supports the fact that if X gets hurt, it's his funeral. But if Y gets hurt because of X's action, then we have an issue. Thus the conclusion is weak cause it now inadvertently requires Y to forcefully put on a seat belt(which it tries to argue against , saying that it must be left to people to decide whether they want to wear a seat belt) as Y is at the mercy of X's driving skills.
Draw the same analogy to passengers in an aircraft at the mercy of the captain's flying skills. Hence C emerges as a winner here.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 797
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 0

Re: CR -risk [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2008, 19:01
this is B
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 551
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

Re: CR -risk [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2008, 19:50
I agree wth B

the aregument is that a person should have the freedom to take risk if he hurt himself only....

B says by doing that, the person is hurting society also as others are paying more as insurance premium.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 518
Schools: Wharton
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 0

Re: CR -risk [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2008, 19:52
goalsnr wrote:
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts
argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not
harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each
persons decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in thefront seat.

C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.


In A and C , the passenger is denied the right to make a choice. So how come choices A and C weaken the conclusion?

(In case you want to know the other choices ,below is the list of answer choices.

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in thefront seat.

B. Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need topay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.

C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.

D. The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws isgreater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.

E. In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts areinjured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.
)


I'm not sure I understand your question, because A and C aren't the correct answer.

B is correct because if B is true, then not wearing seat belts affects everyone, including those who wear seat belts.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 277
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Re: CR -risk [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2008, 03:46
zoinnk wrote:
goalsnr wrote:
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts
argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not
harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each
persons decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in thefront seat.

C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.


In A and C , the passenger is denied the right to make a choice. So how come choices A and C weaken the conclusion?

(In case you want to know the other choices ,below is the list of answer choices.

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in thefront seat.

B. Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need topay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.

C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.

D. The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws isgreater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.

E. In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts areinjured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.
)


I'm not sure I understand your question, because A and C aren't the correct answer.

B is correct because if B is true, then not wearing seat belts affects everyone, including those who wear seat belts.



I thought we had to pick between A and C???
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Posts: 228
Location: Pune
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 3

Re: CR -risk [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2008, 05:52
Answer is B is as it is affecting insurance companies besides the people
_________________

Every Problem Has a Sloution So keep working
AB

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1377
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 10

Reviews Badge
Re: CR -risk [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2008, 06:28
Sorry I made a typo in question. I have corrected my question.

In A and C , the passenger is denied the right to make a choice. So how come choices A and C not weaken the conclusion?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Posts: 228
Location: Pune
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 3

Re: CR -risk [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2008, 06:48
The point is conclusion is only going to be weakend if because of the accidents some other person is affected so in point A and C no where talk about the hindrance to the other people

goalsnr wrote:
Sorry I made a typo in question. I have corrected my question.

In A and C , the passenger is denied the right to make a choice. So how come choices A and C not weaken the conclusion?

_________________

Every Problem Has a Sloution So keep working
AB

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1377
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 10

Reviews Badge
Re: CR -risk [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2008, 14:47
apurva1985 wrote:
The point is conclusion is only going to be weakend if because of the accidents some other person is affected so in point A and C no where talk about the hindrance to the other people

goalsnr wrote:
Sorry I made a typo in question. I have corrected my question.

In A and C , the passenger is denied the right to make a choice. So how come choices A and C not weaken the conclusion?


Ok I get it. Sometimes I hust skip words while reading. :(
The argument means people have the right to take risks as long as no other person is hurt.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 59
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

CAT Tests
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers [#permalink] New post 25 Jun 2014, 23:42
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free
society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.
B. Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the
increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.
C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.
D. The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate
of fatalities in states that do have such laws.
E. In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are
passengers who do wear seat belts.
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done!!
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 452
Location: India
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 368 [0], given: 134

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and [#permalink] New post 26 Jun 2014, 00:06
Expert's post
aimkp wrote:
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free
society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.
B. Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the
increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.
C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.
D. The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate
of fatalities in states that do have such laws.
E. In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are
passengers who do wear seat belts.



Merging similar topic.

Please read the rules before posting any questions. Thanks
_________________

Believe you can and you're halfway there- Theodore Roosevelt


Rules for posting in Quants Forum || Rules for posting in verbal forum

Improving from V30 to V40 | Improving from Q35-40 to Q47 | Bunuel Special Problem Collections New!!

Version-2 SC- 9 Most common Errors New!! || Version-2- CR- 10 Most common ErrorsNew!!


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Re: Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and   [#permalink] 26 Jun 2014, 00:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and student26 2 26 Oct 2010, 00:16
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and manojgmat 13 01 Oct 2009, 00:19
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and spriya 2 24 Jul 2008, 09:00
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and prasannar 7 10 Mar 2008, 01:18
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and itishaj 7 20 May 2006, 04:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.