Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 01:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 0

Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and [#permalink] New post 24 Jul 2008, 09:00
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?


(A) Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.
(B) Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.
(C) Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.
(D) The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat-belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.
(E) In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 376
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-seat belts [#permalink] New post 24 Jul 2008, 09:27
B? - The key is to prove that not wearing seat bealts does have an impact on other people's life.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-seat belts [#permalink] New post 24 Jul 2008, 11:08
vksunder wrote:
B? - The key is to prove that not wearing seat bealts does have an impact on other people's life.


OA is B
yes i missed on this point and marked D :shock:
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Re: CR-seat belts   [#permalink] 24 Jul 2008, 11:08
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and vnbui 6 11 May 2009, 23:00
Experts publish their posts in the topic Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and goalsnr 11 14 Jul 2008, 17:49
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and prasannar 7 10 Mar 2008, 01:18
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and itishaj 7 20 May 2006, 04:53
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and cybera 3 15 Jul 2005, 20:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.