Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 09 Jul 2014, 16:16

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 47
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and [#permalink] New post 11 May 2009, 23:00
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

83% (02:02) correct 16% (00:05) wrong based on 6 sessions
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

(A) Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.

(B) Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or dealths of people not wearing seat belts

(C) Passengers in airplanes are required to wear belts during takeoffs and landings.

(D) The rate of automobile fatalities in state that do not have mandatory seat-belt is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws

(E) In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are pasengers who do not wear seat belts
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1829
Location: New York
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 418 [1] , given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: wear seat belt [#permalink] New post 11 May 2009, 23:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
vnbui wrote:
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

(A) Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.

(B) Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or dealths of people not wearing seat belts

(C) Passengers in airplanes are required to wear belts during takeoffs and landings.


(D) The rate of automobile fatalities in state that do not have mandatory seat-belt is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws

(E) In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are pasengers who do not wear seat belts


A --> Not weakening
C --> Out of scope.
D -->even rate of fatalities more in state<no seat belt law> .. it is not mentioned that.. not wearing seat belt harming other people who wear the seat belts.
Not weakening the conclusion
E --> i belive you type "not" accidentally.
In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are pasengers who do wear seat belts
One way this is supporting the arugment/conclusion drawn.

B --> Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or dealths of people not wearing seat belts
here it is clear the all automobile drivers need to pay more price. Risk is Hurting financially to others (people who wearing seat belts).
Weaken the conclusion.
This is the correct answer.
_________________

Your attitude determines your altitude
Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 47
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: wear seat belt [#permalink] New post 11 May 2009, 23:58
thanks x2suresh for detail explanation

at first, i chose E, now i realize how it support the argument
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 840
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: wear seat belt [#permalink] New post 12 May 2009, 16:47
B looks like the best answer here, but finance seemed a bit out of scope, but then again "harm" wasnt defined
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 195
Schools: Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 23 [1] , given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: wear seat belt [#permalink] New post 14 May 2009, 22:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
Argument is

X:(Not wearing Seatbelts doesn't hurt others) ==> Y:(Don't have to wear them).

Classic Cause & Effect.

Show that X isn't true, show that something else causes Y, show that Y isn't true, show that Y causes X, show that something elses causes X, and so forth...

In this case the answer is a clear B as it gets rid of X, that not wearing seatbelts actually
DOES hurt others (financially).

Final Answer, B.
_________________

Hades

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 163
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 8

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: wear seat belt [#permalink] New post 29 Oct 2009, 01:20
Agree with B
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 213
Location: New Delhi, India
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [1] , given: 12

GMAT Tests User
Re: Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2012, 20:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
vnbui wrote:
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

(A) Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.

(B) Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or dealths of people not wearing seat belts

(C) Passengers in airplanes are required to wear belts during takeoffs and landings.

(D) The rate of automobile fatalities in state that do not have mandatory seat-belt is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws

(E) In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are pasengers who do not wear seat belts

The principle that people are entitled to risk injury provided they do not thereby harm others fails to justify the
individual’s right to decide not to wear seat belts if it can be shown, as B shows, that that decision does harm
others. Therefore, B is the best answer. A suggests that the law may be irrelevant in some cases, but it does not
address the issue of the law’s legitimacy. C cites a requirement analogous to the one at issue, but its existence
alone does not bear on the legitimacy of the one at issue. The argument implicitly concedes that individuals take
risks by not wearing seat belts; therefore, D and E, which simply confirm this concession, do not weaken the
conclusion.
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Re: Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and   [#permalink] 14 Jun 2012, 20:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and spriya 2 24 Jul 2008, 09:00
Experts publish their posts in the topic Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and goalsnr 11 14 Jul 2008, 17:49
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and prasannar 7 10 Mar 2008, 01:18
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and itishaj 7 20 May 2006, 04:53
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and cybera 3 15 Jul 2005, 20:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.