Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 24 Aug 2016, 06:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3301
Followers: 1121

Kudos [?]: 4917 [3] , given: 54

Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2013, 10:48
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (01:49) correct 62% (00:44) wrong based on 329 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care drew close to half a million people, but the city officials estimated the amount of people at the rally to be less than 300,000.
(A) the amount of people at the rally to be less
(B) the number of people at the rally to be less
(C) the number of people attending the rally at fewer
(D) that the number of people attending the rally was less
(E) that the amount of people at the rally was fewer

On the GMAT SC, how do you talk about things you consider, believe, estimate, hold, think, and know? In this following blog article, I discuss all the idioms appropriate to these words:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idiom ... d-knowing/
Also, that blog contains a full discussion of this particular SC question.

Experts --- anything you would like to add on this topic?

Mike
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Last edited by mikemcgarry on 01 May 2013, 13:15, edited 1 time in total.
 Magoosh Discount Codes Math Revolution Discount Codes Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes
Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 162
Location: Poland
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 164 [1] , given: 67

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2013, 11:59
1
KUDOS
According to my knowledge:
"The number of people is"
"A number of people are"

In the OA:
(B) "the number of people at the rally to be fewer"
Can "fewer" modify "the number". Shouldn't "the number" be "lower" or "less"?
_________________

If I answered your question with this post, use the motivating power of kudos!

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3301
Followers: 1121

Kudos [?]: 4917 [0], given: 54

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2013, 13:20
HumptyDumpty wrote:
According to my knowledge:
"The number of people is"
"A number of people are"

In the OA:
(B) "the number of people at the rally to be fewer"
Can "fewer" modify "the number". Shouldn't "the number" be "lower" or "less"?

Dear HumptyDumpty,
On the first point, we are in perfect agreement. If we are talking about what the people are doing, then "a number of people are doing X". If the subject is not the people but the number itself, then "the number of people is divisible by 3."

On the second point, you are totally correct and I was wrong. I updated the question. Thank you for pointing this out.
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: United States
Followers: 234

Kudos [?]: 2552 [3] , given: 123

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2013, 16:20
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
+1 kudo for both of you. This is a very good question.

I just want to elaborate a little bit. According to Ron (instructor at Manhattan Gmat), for numerical quantifiers such as:

level
quantity
number
figure
rate
percentage
proportion

We should use less instead of "fewer" because numerical quantifiers themselves are uncountable.
For examples:
The number of rooms in my house is less than the number of rooms in your house.

Regards.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 993
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 158

Kudos [?]: 1253 [0], given: 226

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2014, 02:32
What is wrong with option D; option D presents a perfect parallelism as well.

Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care drew close to half a million people, but the city officials estimated the amount of people at the rally to be less than 300,000.

(B) the number of people at the rally to be less

(D) that the number of people attending the rally was less (event happened in past and thus "was less" properly represents tense in option D )

I am not able to identify any error in D; Experts kindly shed some light.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 993
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 158

Kudos [?]: 1253 [0], given: 226

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2014, 02:41
I got the explanation on Mangoosh:

http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idiom ... d-knowing/

Estimate that is not a correct Idiom.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3301
Followers: 1121

Kudos [?]: 4917 [0], given: 54

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2014, 11:21
PiyushK wrote:
What is wrong with option D; option D presents a perfect parallelism as well.

Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care drew close to half a million people, but the city officials estimated the amount of people at the rally to be less than 300,000.

(B) the number of people at the rally to be less

(D) that the number of people attending the rally was less (event happened in past and thus "was less" properly represents tense in option D )

I am not able to identify any error in D; Experts kindly shed some light.

PiyushK wrote:
I got the explanation on Mangoosh:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idiom ... d-knowing/
Estimate that is not a correct Idiom.

Dear PiyushK,
First of all, just for reference, the name of my company, "Magoosh", has no "n" in it.
We did some research, and revised our statement on the verb "estimate" --- under certain circumstance, estimate can take a "that" clause, although the predominate idiom is still estimate P to be Q. That's an older blog, and I didn't realize we still had a statement on that blog: I went back and edited that blog just now.

I must apologize. I went back and looked at this question, and there was a typo in the question --- it didn't match the TE. Here's how the question should have been:

Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care drew close to half a million people, but the city officials estimated the amount of people at the rally to be less than 300,000.
(A) the amount of people at the rally to be less
(B) the number of people at the rally to be less
(C) the number of people attending the rally at fewer
(D) that the number of people attending the rally was fewer
(E) that the amount of people at the rally was less

Now, it is clear to you that we have only one fully correct answer?

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 993
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 158

Kudos [?]: 1253 [0], given: 226

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2014, 11:32
Hey Mike,

Thank you for your prompt response and my apologies for that extra n

All right, "estimate that" and "estimate X to be Y" both are correct idiom : noted and updated my list.

Regards
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9148
Followers: 798

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2015, 04:03
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Chat Moderator
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 748
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 537

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2015, 05:28
I still dont get why we use less with the number.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3301
Followers: 1121

Kudos [?]: 4917 [1] , given: 54

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2015, 10:53
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Ergenekon wrote:
I still dont get why we use less with the number.

Dear Ergenekon,
I'm happy to help.

With the issue of countable & uncountable, there are three cases:
I. uncountable - real-world material that doesn't come in discrete units
more water, how much water, much less water, the amount of water
less water, how little water, much less water

II. countable - real-world material that comes in discrete units
more horses, how many horses, many more horses, the number of horses
fewer horses, how few horses, many fewer horses

III. numbers - pure mathematical objects
five is more than three
three is less than five

Even when we are talking about "the number of [real world thing]," the focus is still the number, a number that lives somewhere on the number line. As long as we are somewhere on the number line, we are talking about pure mathematical objects, numbers, and we use "less."

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Chat Moderator
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 748
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 537

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2015, 11:11
mikemcgarry wrote:
Ergenekon wrote:
I still dont get why we use less with the number.

Dear Ergenekon,
I'm happy to help.

With the issue of countable & uncountable, there are three cases:
I. uncountable - real-world material that doesn't come in discrete units
more water, how much water, much less water, the amount of water
less water, how little water, much less water

II. countable - real-world material that comes in discrete units
more horses, how many horses, many more horses, the number of horses
fewer horses, how few horses, many fewer horses

III. numbers - pure mathematical objects
five is more than three
three is less than five

Even when we are talking about "the number of [real world thing]," the focus is still the number, a number that lives somewhere on the number line. As long as we are somewhere on the number line, we are talking about pure mathematical objects, numbers, and we use "less."

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Thanks Mike. It makes a perfect sense now. I have never encountered this concept in the gmat before. Am I alone in this?
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2015
Posts: 131
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 260

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2015, 10:20
mikemcgarry wrote:
Ergenekon wrote:
I still dont get why we use less with the number.

Dear Ergenekon,
I'm happy to help.

With the issue of countable & uncountable, there are three cases:
I. uncountable - real-world material that doesn't come in discrete units
more water, how much water, much less water, the amount of water
less water, how little water, much less water

II. countable - real-world material that comes in discrete units
more horses, how many horses, many more horses, the number of horses
fewer horses, how few horses, many fewer horses

III. numbers - pure mathematical objects
five is more than three
three is less than five

Even when we are talking about "the number of [real world thing]," the focus is still the number, a number that lives somewhere on the number line. As long as we are somewhere on the number line, we are talking about pure mathematical objects, numbers, and we use "less."

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Hi Mike,

five is more than three OR five is greater than three? Or both are correct?!
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3301
Followers: 1121

Kudos [?]: 4917 [1] , given: 54

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2015, 10:26
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
apolo wrote:
Hi Mike,

five is more than three OR five is greater than three? Or both are correct?!

Dear apolo,
Yes, with numbers, it would be more common to use "greater," but "more" is acceptable in some context. What's tricky is that, when we move from pure mathematical numbers to real-world numbers, we sometimes use "higher."
The melting point of tungsten is higher than that of zinc.
The population of Tokyo is greater than that of SF.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Re: Organizers claimed that the rally for public health care   [#permalink] 16 Mar 2015, 10:26
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Concerns about public health led to 3 09 Aug 2016, 06:31
3 Rallies organized in conjunction with the dissemination 4 11 Jun 2015, 04:54
Providing adequate public health-care facilities is a 3 14 May 2010, 16:42
lt;<u>>Rallies organized in conjunction with the 0 17 Mar 2009, 10:50
lt;<u>>Rallies organized in conjunction with the 0 17 Mar 2009, 10:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by