Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 07:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 609
Location: Kolkata,India
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 192 [1] , given: 100

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2009, 21:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

34% (02:11) correct 66% (01:29) wrong based on 135 sessions
[url]Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it[/url], is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton induced x-ray emission

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,

(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray emission,
_________________

countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2009
Posts: 65
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [3] , given: 3

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 02 Oct 2009, 23:22
3
This post received
KUDOS
Hi,

You can refer to Stacey's discussion here http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/og- ... t1277.html
I found it to be a nice explanation of this problem.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 310
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 249 [0], given: 22

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2009, 02:21
IMO A
a technique called X, X must be near to 'a technique'
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 171
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 39

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2009, 10:03
A is the best, considering modifier placement, and verb agreement.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 278 [0], given: 2

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 04 May 2010, 00:02
but in A, which is modifying emission, and that is incorrect, isnt it?

thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Apr 2010
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 3

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 04 May 2010, 01:36
yeh agree with A ....


C) the modifier "called proton-induced X-ray emission" should be placed closer to "A technique"
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 278 [0], given: 2

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2010, 08:45
noboru wrote:
but in A, which is modifying emission, and that is incorrect, isnt it?

thanks.


nobody is going to clarify this?
thanks
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1726
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 329 [0], given: 109

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2010, 09:34
noboru wrote:
noboru wrote:
but in A, which is modifying emission, and that is incorrect, isnt it?

thanks.


nobody is going to clarify this?
thanks


Hi noboru,
"Which" is not modifying emission, it is modifying "proton-induced x-ray emission". That's the noun.
"Which" gives more detail abou the technique. That's why A is correct.

Hope it helps 8-)
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 278 [0], given: 2

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2010, 11:04
metallicafan wrote:
noboru wrote:
noboru wrote:
but in A, which is modifying emission, and that is incorrect, isnt it?

thanks.


nobody is going to clarify this?
thanks


Hi noboru,
"Which" is not modifying emission, it is modifying "proton-induced x-ray emission". That's the noun.
"Which" gives more detail abou the technique. That's why A is correct.

Hope it helps 8-)


Actually I think that "which" modifies "technique", which would make sense to me. In that case, "called proton-induced x-ray emission" is kind of an adjective that gives more detail to "technique".
What do you think about that?
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: GMAT Learner
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 651
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 252 [0], given: 32

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 31 May 2011, 06:11
thesfactor wrote:
Why is E not the answer


Because "Called proton induced x-ray emission" is not place after technique.
_________________

I am student of everyone-baten
Collections:-
PSof OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ps-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110005.html
DS of OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ds-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110004.html
100 GMAT PREP Quantitative collection http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-problem-collections-114358.html
Collections of work/rate problems with solutions http://gmatclub.com/forum/collections-of-work-rate-problem-with-solutions-118919.html
Mixture problems in a file with best solutions: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mixture-problems-with-best-and-easy-solutions-all-together-124644.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 120
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Insurance)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 31 May 2011, 18:27
A is the answer.As the introductory phrase refers to proton-induced x-ray emission and technique correctly modifies it.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 120
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Insurance)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2011, 18:41
C is wordy and awkward construction. In Gmat sentences which are concise and clear are preferred.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Feb 2011
Posts: 61
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2011, 03:21
A for me too...
C and D distort the meaning by saying that the technique was originally developed....
B has issues with modifiers... The first dependent clause does not hav any connection with the rest of the clause...
E is incorrect because it has 'run-on' sentences.. Moreover it is wordy...

:)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 258
Schools: UNC Duke Kellogg
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 4

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2011, 15:46
The link to the MGMAT site w/ the explanation was excellent!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 147
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 1

Re: proton-induced x-ray emission [#permalink] New post 04 Sep 2011, 23:35
WHICH in A and C both refer to emission. But as per OG A is correct and C is incorrect.

Can anyone elaborate on this one?
Expert Post
GMAT Pill Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 1611
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 294

Kudos [?]: 692 [0], given: 6

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2013, 16:06
Expert's post
To keep it simple, here's how we look at it:

Originally developed for [X], [a particular technique]...is finding uses in x, y, and z.

This is a lot easier to comprehend and work with. Thinking like this will cut down the potential for stupid, overlooked mistakes.

Pay attention to "prepositional phrases" - keywords like "for" "in" etc...or just general phrases.

In the above example, I read:

"which can quickly analyze the chemical elements"

as "which can blah blah blah"

I read: "in almost any substance without destroying"
as: "in blah...without destroying it"

I read: "Originally developed for detecting air pollutants"
as
"Originally developed for blah..."

I read: "a technique called proton-induced X-ray remission"
as
"a technique called blah.."

Get used to using "blah" to replace fancy parts of the sentence and you'll be surprised at how simple a lot of these GMAT questions actually are.
_________________


... and more


Image What's Inside GMAT Pill?

Zeke Lee, GMAT Pill Study Method (Study Less. Score More.)


GMAT Pill Reviews | GMAT PILL Free Practice Test

Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2013, 16:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a kripalkavi 9 02 Feb 2007, 23:07
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a arjsingh1976 1 10 Nov 2006, 05:08
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a vivek123 8 30 Jun 2006, 23:45
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a swath20 9 31 Mar 2005, 11:01
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a HongHu 7 30 Jan 2005, 21:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.