|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 23 Dec 2009
Posts: 29
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 7
|
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]
08 Feb 2010, 07:24
Question Stats:
87% (02:45) correct
12% (01:25) wrong based on 5 sessions
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology. (A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, (B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission (C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, (D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it, (E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission,
can you kindly help me with this question. Please explain reasons for your answer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 85
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 1
|
Correct answer C)
A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
Subject + Adverb + Verb + Complement Subject + blah blah + is + blah blah blah
D and E although similar are just over wording statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 23 Dec 2009
Posts: 29
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 7
|
LUGO wrote: Correct answer C)
A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
Subject + Adverb + Verb + Complement Subject + blah blah + is + blah blah blah
D and E although similar are just over wording statements I got the same answer, but OA is A. can someone have an explanation for that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 85
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 1
|
lucalelli88 wrote: LUGO wrote: Correct answer C)
A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
Subject + Adverb + Verb + Complement Subject + blah blah + is + blah blah blah
D and E although similar are just over wording statements I got the same answer, but OA is A. can someone have an explanation for that? Do not see the reason why but I guess that like other similar English constructions in the GMAT, is all about what the examiners' preferred style is more than what it is grammatically correct i.e. adverb swap by the subject. You need to learn these tricks, and hope you get it right in the exam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 23 Dec 2009
Posts: 29
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 7
|
Called proton-induced X-ray emission should be placed next to a technique and should not be set off by commas; relative clause introduced by which incorrectly and illogically modifies emission. that is the Official guide 12 edition explanation. I dont understand why "which" here is not referred to A technique.. if you want to check is the question 107
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 85
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 1
|
if you want to check is the question 107
Thanks for your input but after my first attempt with the GMAT I am done with it and waiting for interview.
Good luck to you on your GMAT!
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1635
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 25
Kudos [?]:
119
[0], given: 2
|
but in A, which is modifying emission, and that is incorrect, isnt it? thanks.
_________________
The sky is the limit 800 is the limit
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1570
Followers: 12
Kudos [?]:
121
[0], given: 6
|
but in A, which is modifying emission, and that is incorrect, isnt it?
hi noboru, I was under the same impression that 'which' is modifying 'emission' but that is not correct. "which" in A is correctly modifying "technique" . Actually "called proton-induced X-ray emission" is just a descriptive phrase for "technique" and "which" is modifying the extended noun phrase. Also, "proton-induced X-ray emission" is the name of the technique and the phrase "technique called proton-induced X-ray emission" has to be together and closer to "Originally developed for directing air pollutants".
Hope that makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 234
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
44
[0], given: 38
|
A it is. it is the technique which is called "... emission". they should stick with each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 959
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 38
Kudos [?]:
556
[0], given: 40
|
IMO A. All part (modifying immediatly preceding part or modifying the parts in the same clause) seems correct to me.
_________________
Want to improve your CR: cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html Tricky Quant problems: 50-tricky-questions-92834.html Important Grammer Fundamentals: key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 188
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
45
[0], given: 11
|
can anyone help to find out the principal clause and all the subordinate clauses. I think we are missing comma.. Here the principal clause has two verbs.
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology. (A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, (B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission (C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, (D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it, (E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 178
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 10
|
(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
- Construction is A has correct modifier Orginally developed ..., a technique x-ray emission, which...
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
Construction is C is such that the part called proton-induced x-ray emission has become a sub-ordinate clause which can be supressed. So rewriting the sentence supressing the clause shows that which after comma is redundant
If I were to write it correctly, I would say - A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: mba here i come!
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 271
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37 GMAT 2: Q V
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
458
[0], given: 48
|
noboru wrote: but in A, which is modifying emission, and that is incorrect, isnt it?
'which' modifies 'proton-induced X-ray emission' (a technique). so this is correct usage.
_________________
press +1 Kudos to appreciate posts Download Valuable Collection of Percentage Questions (PS/DS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 270
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 520 Q42 V19 GMAT 2: 540 Q44 V21
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 22
|
Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]
03 Mar 2012, 03:12
A... Originally developed for detecting air pollutants --- is an opening modifier which modifies technique called proton-induced X-ray emission --- is another modifier(Past participle) also modifying technique. which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost---is modifying technique any substance without destroying it
_________________
The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 206
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 5
|
Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]
11 Mar 2012, 11:32
I picked A for this question:
A. Modifiers are placed accurately.
B. The problem with this answer is that the 2 initial modifiers should be modifying "a technique." However, "having" seems to modify the first modifiers. Also, these modifiers are misplaced because they should be placed on either side of "a technique."
C. Again, misplaced modifiers here. "Which" seems to be modifying "emission" - definitely incorrect.
D. Again, misplaced modifiers. "Which" is modifying "emission" - this is incorrect.
E. "Called proton induced X-ray emission" should be modifying technique. This is so far away from "technique" that is becomes confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 280
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
154
[0], given: 19
|
Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]
06 Apr 2012, 05:47
a. Correct b. two lengthy modifiers c. Called not next to Technique + use of comma before called d. Called not next to Technique + use of comma before called e. lengthy sentence construction + Called not next to Technique + use of comma before called
_________________
******************** Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 98
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[1] , given: 62
|
Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]
17 Nov 2012, 06:23
1
This post received KUDOS
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology. (A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it (B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission usage of having is incorrect(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, called should be placed right next to technique without any comma(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it, called should be placed right next to technique without any comma(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission, called should be placed right next to technique without any comma
_________________
if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a
[#permalink]
17 Nov 2012, 06:23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a
|
mbamantra |
5 |
25 Apr 2004, 07:41 |
|
|
|
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a
|
HongHu |
7 |
30 Jan 2005, 22:29 |
|
|
|
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a
|
swath20 |
9 |
31 Mar 2005, 12:01 |
|
|
|
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a
|
rahulraao |
7 |
14 Nov 2005, 23:37 |
|
6
|
|
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a
|
gmatpunjabi |
14 |
08 Feb 2012, 14:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|