Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2013, 22:04
Customize  |  Hide

Over the last century, paleontologists have used small

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 277
Location: Chennai,India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink] New post 09 Feb 2006, 23:30
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.
Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?
(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.
(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen.
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.
(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.
(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.
_________________

vazlkaiye porkalam vazltuthan parkanum.... porkalam maralam porkalthan maruma

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 104
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2006, 00:13
C is the right choice. It proves that the classification is unjustified.

My choice was E at first but it strenghtens the unjustified classification.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2934
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2006, 01:55
Is it C???

I was stuck between C and E. But C strengthens properly saying that even though no geographical area supports different species at the same time, then how the fossils found at one place can be classified in different species.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Director
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 811
Location: BULGARIA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2006, 03:51
Think that E) is correct
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 104
Location: Barcelona
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2006, 05:10
(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.
Does not pertain to the argument being made at large. "Fossils are being classified and the differences between each one of them is being used as a parameter".
(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen. Would weaken the conclusion by justifying the classification.
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time. Negate it and it will weaken the conclusion. A geographical area will support more than three similar species at the same time. (D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.
Generic argument. While in many species individuals display quite marked variation there is a possibility that in the triceratops there might be variations between individuals. (E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.

Diffrences are no less distinctive irrespective of the area they come from. This strengthens the argument that the classification is just.
_________________

...................................................................
reloading NEURON JELLY to reach another galaxy.

CEO
CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3291
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 419 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2006, 05:51
If you step back from the passage, C emerges as the clear answer.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 277
Location: Chennai,India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Feb 2006, 09:41
good job guys OA is C
_________________

vazlkaiye porkalam vazltuthan parkanum.... porkalam maralam porkalthan maruma

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 483
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Feb 2006, 13:08
Late but its C.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 12 Feb 2006, 02:05
Even though (C) uses extreme language, it is the clear reason why 16 species cannot exist.
  [#permalink] 12 Feb 2006, 02:05
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Over the last century, paleontologists have used small Janice 2 29 Nov 2004, 13:59
Popular new posts Over the last century, paleontologists have used small sushom101 12 20 Oct 2005, 14:15
New posts Over the last century, paleontologists have used small joemama142000 4 04 Dec 2005, 21:09
New posts 1 Over the last century, paleontologists have used small tarek99 6 10 Jan 2008, 07:20
New posts 3 Over the last century, paleontologists have used small SudiptoGmat 7 27 Jan 2010, 14:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Over the last century, paleontologists have used small

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.