Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 07:43

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Over the last century, paleontologists have used small

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1551
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 233 [1] , given: 1

Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink] New post 10 Jan 2008, 06:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.

Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?

(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.

(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen.

(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.

(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.

(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than
differences between specimens that came from different areas


Please explain your answer. Also, is the question asking us to strengthen the conclusion or is it asking for an assumption? Didn't quite understand what the question is really asking us to do.
thanks
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 867
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Fossil Specimens [#permalink] New post 10 Jan 2008, 06:37
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.

The passage has stated a conclusion saying "we can't be sure there were 16 species because they found 11 of them from specimens from the same area and time" and we need to choose the statement that makes makes this conclusion acceptable. If C is true and no area ever supports more than 3 similar species then we can say the findings are incorrect.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1551
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 233 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Fossil Specimens [#permalink] New post 10 Jan 2008, 06:42
thanks man. would you then please explain what's wrong with E? thanks
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 867
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Fossil Specimens [#permalink] New post 10 Jan 2008, 06:46
Alright, the passage is saying scientists have found 16 different species of this dinosaur in the same area but the author says this claim is unjustified because they found most of the species in the same area from the same time.

C makes this claim legitimate because it says that 11 similar species in the same area at the same time is impossible!

E says that the species found in the same area can be as distinct from one another as species from other areas, but the passage doesn't say anything about the fossils and how distinct they are. The main point the author is making is "these claims of 16 species can't be real because they were all found close together" and leaves it at that. We need to find something that makes it impossible for 11 different species to be found near each other. E makes it sound like it's possible and they'd be distinct.

Sorry my verbal explanations are so bad, I hope this helped.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1551
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 233 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Fossil Specimens [#permalink] New post 10 Jan 2008, 08:23
no need to appologize man. i think you're explanation is great. thanks a lot
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 583
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Fossil Specimens [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2008, 09:29
eschn3am wrote:

C makes this claim legitimate because it says that 11 similar species in the same area at the same time is impossible!


eschn3am,
Isn’t C weakening authors argument that “since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time”
And C says . three or more species cant exist in same area in same time.
So if both this statement are contrast, how can a proper conclusion be drawn.

I know OA is C , and I am missing something.
Please illuminate me!
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 867
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Fossil Specimens [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2008, 10:31
The author is arguing against this conclusion.

Quote:
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.

Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?


Quote:
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.


The fact that no more than 3 similar species live together backs up the claim that the classification is unjustified. The fact that the author is arguing against the claim is what you can't miss while reading it.
Re: CR: Fossil Specimens   [#permalink] 15 Jan 2008, 10:31
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
12 Over the last century, paleontologists have used small Jivana 15 11 Aug 2009, 18:49
Experts publish their posts in the topic Over the last century, paleontologists have used small GMATBLACKBELT 5 01 Feb 2008, 12:42
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small razrulz 8 09 Feb 2006, 22:30
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small sushom101 12 20 Oct 2005, 13:15
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small Janice 2 29 Nov 2004, 12:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Over the last century, paleontologists have used small

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.