Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 23 Aug 2016, 23:11

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Over the last century, paleontologists have used small

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 454
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 108 [4] , given: 5

Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Aug 2009, 19:49
4
KUDOS
21
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (02:44) correct 42% (01:49) wrong based on 1142 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.

Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?

(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.
(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen.
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.
(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.
(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.

I choose
[Reveal] Spoiler:
E
But it is not the OA.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by dentobizz on 04 Nov 2013, 02:39, edited 1 time in total.
editing for the CR project
Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 607
Location: Kolkata,India
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 642 [0], given: 100

Re: ETS Paper test#42 CR#15 [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Aug 2009, 20:50
OUCH!Even I answered E Could anybody explain?
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902

Intern
Joined: 04 Aug 2009
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [4] , given: 4

Re: ETS Paper test#42 CR#15 [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Aug 2009, 21:19
4
KUDOS
Jivana wrote:
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.

Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?

(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.
(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen.
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.
(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.

(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Chose E, OA is C

The conclusion of the argument is "This classification is unjustified". Therefore, E is wrong because E weakens the conclusion.
Manager
Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 126
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 3

Re: ETS Paper test#42 CR#15 [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Aug 2009, 13:11
seems like D. What is OA?
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 314
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 286 [4] , given: 9

Re: paleontologists - ETS Paper test#42 CR#15 [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Aug 2009, 01:59
4
KUDOS
Premise: paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species

Counter premise: however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time

Conclusion: the classification is unjustified.

Now we have to find a link between the counter premise and the conclusion. This link will allow the conclusion to be properly drawn

(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.

This means that some species that lived in a given area are preserved as a fossil. This supports the paleontologists view

(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen.

same as A

(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.

This restricts to three the number of species in a geographical area at the same time. Let's put both premises together to see if we can draw the conclusion

since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time and since no geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time, we can conclude that it is impossible to classify triceratops into sixteen species.

This sounds correct

(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.

(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.

This means that we should not distinguish between triceratops that came from the same are and triceratops that came from different areas. This supports the paleontologists view that we can use the differences in fossils to classify triceratops.
Intern
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 1

Re: paleontologists - ETS Paper test#42 CR#15 [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Aug 2009, 02:18
E says that the differences are less disticnt but still there are differences ...

C is right in saying that since max 3 species can survive, the eleven differentiations are not justified ...
_________________

Regards,
Saaquib

If you find any grammatical mistake in my post please don't hesitate in pointing out.

Please +1 if you find this post useful.

My Blog

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 607
Location: Kolkata,India
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 642 [0], given: 100

Re: paleontologists - ETS Paper test#42 CR#15 [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Aug 2009, 22:50
What is the reson for eliminating *(D)?
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902

Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 51
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Re: paleontologists - ETS Paper test#42 CR#15 [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Aug 2009, 08:21
C seems to be right because it clearly says that not more than 3 species can be found in the same geographic area. Therefore, the assertion of the author is correct that 11 species could not have come from the same area.
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 184 [0], given: 51

Re: paleontologists - ETS Paper test#42 CR#15 [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Apr 2011, 03:02
'The conclusion of the argument is "This classification is unjustified". Therefore, E is wrong because E weakens the conclusion.'

maximum explanation in minimum words.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 543
GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 102

Kudos [?]: 767 [1] , given: 295

Re: Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Nov 2013, 02:59
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Bumping for review and further discussion*.

_________________

Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources such as 1000 series.

Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Re: paleontologists - ETS Paper test#42 CR#15 [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Nov 2013, 09:53
tejal777 wrote:
What is the reson for eliminating *(D)?

D says "In many species, individuals display quite marked variation."
Sure it might be true. But have a closer look at the option. It says MANY.

The triceratops might not be one of the many.

Option C correctly states that "No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time."
Hence it is not possible to have found 11 species of triceratops in the same area at the same time
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 394
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 139

Re: Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jul 2014, 07:53
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.

Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?

(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil. - So what..even if there are more than 11 species living there..it has nothing to do with classification issue
(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen.- Again nothing to do with classification issue
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.- So how come 11 were found to be living in the same area at the same time..
(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.- We donot know the details of the classification method used..we cannot comment on this one
(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.- Differences may be less or more distinctive..but we have already identified the species and the identification is not at stake here..it is the classification of the species
_________________

Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all
Don't let an extra chromosome get you down..

Manager
Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Posts: 138
WE: Project Management (Computer Hardware)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 122

Re: Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jul 2014, 03:11
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Jivana wrote:
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.

Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?

Conclusion: The classification is unjustified.

(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil. - This does not mean that there couldn't be 16 different species (or 11 for that matter) ; there could be more as well. So A goes out.
(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen. - This somehow neither justifies nor defies the conclusion.
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time. - If there could only exist 3 species at max in a given area then 11 being found in a particular area is unjustified. Hence C is the answer.
(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation. - What species?
(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas. - This rather defies the conclusion by proving that there are these different species that might have existed.

I choose
[Reveal] Spoiler:
E
But it is not the OA.

I chose C. Explanations in red. Please let me know if I went wrong somewhere.

----------
Click kudos if it helped.
_________________

Illegitimi non carborundum.

Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 993
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 158

Kudos [?]: 1253 [0], given: 226

Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jul 2014, 05:53
E is weakening the conclusion.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2013
Posts: 40
Location: United States
GPA: 3
WE: Information Technology (Insurance)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 18

Re: Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jul 2014, 02:58
tejal777 wrote:
What is the reson for eliminating *(D)?

The conclusion in the argument is the fact that researchers have taken 11 species from the same place to say that they all belong to different categories sort is unjustified".

Why is it unjustified ?

Kinda do a lil bit of pre-thinking :
1. Could be that the eleven distinguished fossils may belong to the same category sort but had their fossils altered due to some other factors (or)
2. U cant find all 11 at the same spot

C. says u cant find more than 3 at the same geo location. From pre-thought answer 2 we could say that right answer is C.

As per D it says : in many species , individuals have quite marked variations.

* Talks about species in general
* Even if you assume species to be ticeratops (which u r nt meant to assume) it does not help in saying why the conclusion is unjustified. If D is taken as true then
the conclusion should have been otherwise.

Hope this helps. Please correct me if I am wrong
_________________

Never give up, never celebrate, never leave your spot until it is finally over
We are winning this GMAT-war together

Manager
Joined: 04 Mar 2014
Posts: 145
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 178

Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Oct 2014, 22:29
Was stuck for an eternity between C and D.Finally marked the correct answer!
D does not help to conclude the argument.The argument specifically mentions that, it is the fact that the fossils come from the same area is the reason for the problem.So we need to support only this "Area thing",not any other justification.Although D does provide a justification but it does not specifically attack the "Area" part of the problem.
Hope I'm able to explain it correctly.
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 204
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 49

Re: Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 May 2015, 05:47
Jivana wrote:
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.

Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?

(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.
(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen.
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.
(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.
(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.

I choose
[Reveal] Spoiler:
E
But it is not the OA.

C EXPLAINS WHY CLASSIFICATION IS NOT JUSTIFIED IN TERMS OF AREA
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 369
Schools: Schulich '16
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 4

Re: Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 May 2015, 08:59
E actually weakens the conclusion that "the claim is unjustified"..it actually supports the first premise of the argument

you can eliminate A,B

D-irrelavent as per argument.

Only C answers that not more than 3 species come from same land.

Sometimes some easy answer choices also leave us in doubt and we suspect it:) thats the beauty of gmat

IMO-C
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 233
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 13

Re: Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Jun 2015, 22:31
hocnhan wrote:
Jivana wrote:
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small differences between fossil specimens to classify triceratops into sixteen species. This classification is unjustified, however, since the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.

Which of the following, if true, would enable the conclusion of the argument to be properly drawn?

(A) Not every species that lived in a given area is preserved as a fossil.
(B) At least one individual of every true species of triceratops has been discovered as a fossil specimen.
(C) No geographical area ever supports more than three similar species at the same time.
(D) In many species, individuals display quite marked variation.

(E) Differences between fossil specimens of triceratops that came from the same area are no less distinctive than differences between specimens that came from different areas.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Chose E, OA is C

The conclusion of the argument is "This classification is unjustified". Therefore, E is wrong because E weakens the conclusion.

GMATPill

Could you please provide your reasoning for C and E. Also Which framework we will apply here.
Joined: 14 Sep 2013
Posts: 87
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 540 Q48 V17
GMAT 2: 630 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 15

Re: Over the last century, paleontologists have used small [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jul 2015, 23:09
Conclusion:The classification is unjustified
Premise:the specimens used to distinguish eleven of the species come from animals that lived in the same area at the same time.
The argument assumes that in same area at same time 11 species being present is not justified.We need to find the answer that talk about number of species in a particular area at same time.

A,B and D are not relevant.
E actually weakens the argument.
C is the answer as it talk about only 3 species can be present in same area at same time.
Re: Over the last century, paleontologists have used small   [#permalink] 25 Jul 2015, 23:09

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 For over a century, drosophila melanogaster have been used to study 4 25 Jul 2016, 06:12
2 Since at least 1868, paleontologists have been arguing over 11 10 Jul 2011, 21:18
7 Over the last century, paleontologists have used small 9 27 Jan 2010, 14:15
Over the last century, paleontologists have used small 5 01 Feb 2008, 13:42
1 Over the last century, paleontologists have used small 6 10 Jan 2008, 07:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by