Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 10:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Posts: 348
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 0

Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2008, 10:09
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:41) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 5 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit growth in annual revenues, combined with a substantial improvement in operating margins. Since this growth is likely to persist in the future, the stock of Company X will soon experience dramatic appreciation.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

a) Company X has a large market share in its industry.
b) Prior to the last 5 years, Company X had experienced similarly dramatic growth in sales associated with stable or improving operating margins.
c) The growth of Company X is likely to persist in the future.
d) The current price of the stock of Company X does not fully reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm.
e) The stock of Company X will outperform other stocks in the same industry.
_________________

To find what you seek in the road of life, the best proverb of all is that which says:
"Leave no stone unturned."
-Edward Bulwer Lytton

If you have any questions
New!
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 994
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2008, 10:18
IMO d.
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Posts: 377
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2008, 10:18
looks like healthy D

_________________

The one who flies is worthy. The one who is worthy flies. The one who doesn't fly isn't worthy

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 296
Location: Bangalore, India
Schools: R1:Cornell, Yale, NYU. R2: Haas, MIT, Ross
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2008, 10:19

If the stock will soon experience dramatic appreciation, and the company in past five years has shown DD growth in annual revenues and substantial improvement in operating margins, then the current price of the stock of Company X does not fully reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm.
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1430
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 360 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2008, 10:22
Another D.

Do the negation test and the conclusion will fall apart.
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Mar 2008
Posts: 348
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2008, 10:29
OA is (D). Agree, negation helps a great deal in these type of questions.

Wow.. that was fast (so many responses in less than 5ish mins) Thanks.
_________________

To find what you seek in the road of life, the best proverb of all is that which says:
"Leave no stone unturned."
-Edward Bulwer Lytton

Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 793
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2008, 10:37
Conclusion: Stock of company X will experience dramatic appreciation.

a) Company X has a large market share in its industry. [Has nothing to do with the stock appreciation – eliminate it]
b) Prior to the last 5 years, Company X had experienced similarly dramatic growth in sales associated with stable or improving operating margins. [History is history – eliminate it]
c) The growth of Company X is likely to persist in the future. [Repetition whatever the conclusion says – eliminate it]
d) The current price of the stock of Company X does not fully reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm. [Hold on]
e) The stock of Company X will outperform other stocks in the same industry. [Other stock – out of scope]

Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 554
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 427 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2008, 04:08
icandy can you help me in negation process, how to do that...means what should be the approach of that? for this question I also reached to ans D, but not by negation process

I would really appte if you explain a process little bit.

regards.
SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2492
Followers: 68

Kudos [?]: 737 [0], given: 19

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2008, 06:56
leonidas wrote:
Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit growth in annual revenues, combined with a substantial improvement in operating margins. Since this growth is likely to persist in the future, the stock of Company X will soon experience dramatic appreciation.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

a) Company X has a large market share in its industry.
b) Prior to the last 5 years, Company X had experienced similarly dramatic growth in sales associated with stable or improving operating margins.
c) The growth of Company X is likely to persist in the future.
d) The current price of the stock of Company X does not fully reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm.
e) The stock of Company X will outperform other stocks in the same industry.

If D is true, the the price should (even must) appreciate. Other choices might have hidden or unspelled costs.

Good question.
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

VP
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 1043
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 570 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2008, 10:05
icandy can you help me in negation process, how to do that...means what should be the approach of that? for this question I also reached to ans D, but not by negation process

I would really appte if you explain a process little bit.

regards.

Let me try ....

For assumption questions we can try the Assumption-Negation technique to check if the answer choice is right ....

First, You apply the Assumption-Negation technique only on the strong answer contenders after you eliminate the obviously wrong answers (not on all 5 choices). This is because we are short on time on GMAT.

Only 2 steps.

1. Logically negate the answer choice under consideration
2. The answer choice that attacks/weakens the conclusion is the correct answer.

Lets take our example
leonidas wrote:
Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit growth in annual revenues, combined with a substantial improvement in operating margins. Since this growth is likely to persist in the future, the stock of Company X will soon experience dramatic appreciation.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

a) Company X has a large market share in its industry.
b) Prior to the last 5 years, Company X had experienced similarly dramatic growth in sales associated with stable or improving operating margins.
c) The growth of Company X is likely to persist in the future.
d) The current price of the stock of Company X does not fully reflect the promising growth prospects of the firm.
e) The stock of Company X will outperform other stocks in the same industry.

Conclusion: the stock of Company X will soon experience dramatic appreciation.

The conclusion brings in the new term "stocks". I said new because none of the premises had this word. So the assumption will MOST likely have "stocks" mentioned.

Only choices D and E have the word "stock"

Now we have 2 contenders for our answer, Choices D and E.

Assumption-Negation technique applied to Choice D :
negate choice D. ----> The current price of the stock of Company X fully reflects the promising growth prospects of the firm.

does this weaken the argument ? This actually weakens the argument. This is the correct answer

Assumption-Negation technique applied to Choice E :
negate choice E. ----> The stock of Company X will NOT outperform other stocks in the same industry
does this weaken the argument ? This does not affect the argument in any way. The company may or may not perform its competitors, but the company may still have double digit growth.

So D.
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

Re: CR: Growth Revenues   [#permalink] 29 Oct 2008, 10:05
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Over the past ten years 3 04 Jun 2015, 02:18
7 Over the past ten years, the population of Dismaston has gro 5 04 Mar 2014, 04:40
19 Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit 14 26 Nov 2010, 02:09
5 Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit 15 18 Oct 2010, 20:05
17 Owner of JavaJoint: Over the past year, the coffee store has 58 21 May 2008, 07:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.