Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Aug 2015, 07:56
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Over the past decade, many companies have begun using

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: pursuing a dream
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 45
Schools: MIT Sloan (LGO)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 8

GMAT ToolKit User
Over the past decade, many companies have begun using [#permalink] New post 26 Jan 2013, 21:06
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (03:36) correct 22% (01:23) wrong based on 158 sessions
Over the past decade, many companies have begun using automated telephone services; callers hear a machine-generated voice and are able to select options using the numbers on the telephone keypad. Research shows that callers are more patient when the machine-generated voice is that of a woman. Thus, smaller companies that cannot afford automated services should consider hiring women, rather than men, to interact with costomers by phone.

Which of the following, if true, would be most damaging to the conclusion above?

A. Automated telephone services are becoming cheaper and cheaper every year.
B. Patient customers tend to order more products and return fewer products than impatient customers.
C. A separated study indicated that extra patience exhibited by callers is limited to interactions with an automated system.
D. Some customers prefer automated systems to talking with a live person.
E. On average, callers are only slightly more patient when interacting with a female voice, rather than a male voice, in an automated telephone system.



I've narrowed it down to C and E, but I can't see any difference between them.

Both of them limit the patience to an automated telephone system, so I can't see which one weakens the most the conclusion above.

Any hint?

Official explanation to eliminate E is:

This one seems to be telling me there isn't a huge difference between male and female voices — but there is still a small positive effect for female voices. If anything, this strengthens the argument; after all, as a small business owner, I'll take any necessary steps that will get me more business! I only have one answer left, so C is the answer.

How does E strengthen the argument?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Current Student
User avatar
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 648
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 424 [0], given: 23

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Automated telephone services [#permalink] New post 26 Jan 2013, 21:26
LGOdream wrote:
Over the past decade, many companies have begun using automated telephone services; callers hear a machine-generated voice and are able to select options using the numbers on the telephone keypad. Research shows that callers are more patient when the machine-generated voice is that of a woman. Thus, smaller companies that cannot afford automated services should consider hiring women, rather than men, to interact with costomers by phone.

Which of the following, if true, would be most damaging to the conclusion above?

A. Automated telephone services are becoming cheaper and cheaper every year.
B. Patient customers tend to order more products and return fewer products than impatient customers.
C. A separated study indicated that extra patience exhibited by callers is limited to interactions with an automated system.
D. Some customers prefer automated systems to talking with a live person.
E. On average, callers are only slightly more patient when interacting with a female voice, rather than a male voice, in an automated telephone system.



I've narrowed it down to C and E, but I can't see any difference between them.

Both of them limit the patience to an automated telephone system, so I can't see which one weakens the most the conclusion above.

Any hint?

Official explanation to eliminate E is:

This one seems to be telling me there isn't a huge difference between male and female voices — but there is still a small positive effect for female voices. If anything, this strengthens the argument; after all, as a small business owner, I'll take any necessary steps that will get me more business! I only have one answer left, so C is the answer.

How does E strengthen the argument?


Since you've narrowed it down to C and E, lets discuss only these two.

C: conclusion is: smaller companies that cannot afford automated services should consider hiring women, rather than men, to interact with costomers by phone. However, option C clearly states that the reason behind this conclusion is incorrect because the patience is exhibited only in case of automated system. We got the damaging option but anyway look at E.

E: two points, to note here. one, that this option talks about only male vs female voice in an automated telephone system, not about in person vs automated system. second, it actually supports the conclusion by telling there is a slight advantage in using female voice. Doesnt help destroying the conclusion as well as, or rather even close to as much as, C does.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!! ;-)
Black Friday Debrief

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 57

Re: Over the past decade, many companies have begun using [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2013, 10:22
Hi Guys,
Even though I chose "Option C" but I was really confused b/w "Option C" and "Option D".

Can anyone please explain why "Option D" is rejected?
Current Student
avatar
Status: Prep Mode
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 165
Location: India
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 69

Reviews Badge
Re: Over the past decade, many companies have begun using [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2013, 11:32
PrateekDua wrote:
Hi Guys,
Even though I chose "Option C" but I was really confused b/w "Option C" and "Option D".

Can anyone please explain why "Option D" is rejected?


Over the past decade, many companies have begun using automated telephone services; callers hear a machine-generated voice and are able to select options using the numbers on the telephone keypad. Research shows that callers are more patient when the machine-generated voice is that of a woman. Thus, smaller companies that cannot afford automated services should consider hiring women, rather than men, to interact with costomers by phone.

Which of the following, if true, would be most damaging to the conclusion above?

A. Automated telephone services are becoming cheaper and cheaper every year.
B. Patient customers tend to order more products and return fewer products than impatient customers.
C. A separated study indicated that extra patience exhibited by callers is limited to interactions with an automated system.
D. Some customers prefer automated systems to talking with a live person.
E. On average, callers are only slightly more patient when interacting with a female voice, rather than a male voice, in an automated telephone system.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd say Choice C is better than Choice D.

D takes care of only SOME CUSTOMERS. --- It could be 10 in a 100, so still we have 90 folks who prefer otherwise. Doesn't hurt the argument.
SOME word is ambiguous when it comes to weaken or strengthen the argument.

Does it makes sense?
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 703
Followers: 278

Kudos [?]: 477 [1] , given: 5

Re: Over the past decade, many companies have begun using [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2013, 14:11
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
This question is asking us to weaken the conclusion (or attack an assumption - remember that assumptions are logical gaps between premises and conclusions)
Premise: Callers are more patient with women over men when using an automated system.
Conclusion: Small business owners who can't afford an automated system should hire women over men (to take advantage of that increased patience).
One Assumption: Customer patience is the same with an automated system as it is with a "live" system.

Answer choice C tells us that customer patience is different between automated systems and live callers. Therefore, we cannot conclude that we will experience greater patience by hiring more women in live systems.

Answer choice E affirms that there is greater patience in an automated system and does nothing to suggest that we won't experience the same level of patience in a live system.

Answer choice D is irrelevant to the argument. The argument deals with preference between male and female and concludes that the preference (patience) will translate to a live system. The preference between automated or live systems is outside the scope of the argument. [Those people not using automated systems are doing it because they cannot afford those systems]

KW
_________________


Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile



Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2014
Posts: 2
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 11

Re: Over the past decade, many companies have begun using [#permalink] New post 17 Nov 2014, 05:27
Hello,

Can the following be explained -

Why is the Conclusion in this given Critical Reasoning question silent on the fact that
"Thus, smaller companies that cannot afford an automated service should consider hiring....."

if this aspect is taken into consideration, then Option A also looks attractive as it Weakens the conclusion
because even the Automated telephone services are getting affordable and hence No need for hiring female or male.

Thanks in Advance.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Manager
Affiliations: Manager
Joined: 06 Nov 2012
Posts: 150
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
GPA: 3
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 81

Re: Over the past decade, many companies have begun using [#permalink] New post 17 Nov 2014, 07:24
minicooper wrote:
Hello,

Can the following be explained -

Why is the Conclusion in this given Critical Reasoning question silent on the fact that
"Thus, smaller companies that cannot afford an automated service should consider hiring....."

if this aspect is taken into consideration, then Option A also looks attractive as it Weakens the conclusion
because even the Automated telephone services are getting affordable and hence No need for hiring female or male.

Thanks in Advance.


I agree to above observation. Conclusion is talking about affordibility hence A seems to be correct answer.... :roll:
_________________

Hard-work, Perseverance and Commitment.....

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 703
Followers: 278

Kudos [?]: 477 [1] , given: 5

Re: Over the past decade, many companies have begun using [#permalink] New post 21 Nov 2014, 11:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
minicooper wrote:
Hello,

Can the following be explained -

Why is the Conclusion in this given Critical Reasoning question silent on the fact that
"Thus, smaller companies that cannot afford an automated service should consider hiring....."

if this aspect is taken into consideration, then Option A also looks attractive as it Weakens the conclusion
because even the Automated telephone services are getting affordable and hence No need for hiring female or male.

Thanks in Advance.


Remember that the GMAT is trying to trick you all the time! Option A exists because it seems relevant, but it's not damaging to the conclusion. The conclusion states that small companies should hire women and is limited to those companies that cannot afford a system. Regardless of the price of the system, only those companies that can't afford it are considered in the conclusion. Until the systems are free, there will be companies that can't afford the system, therefore the conclusion would still be valid.

Choice C is the only answer that truly damages the conclusion because the findings are not valid for human systems.

KW
_________________


Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile



Re: Over the past decade, many companies have begun using   [#permalink] 21 Nov 2014, 11:40
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic Political advocacy groups have begun to use information maybeam 3 26 Jul 2012, 09:33
4 Political advocacy groups have begun to use information maybeam 4 26 Jul 2012, 09:28
1 In recent years many retailers have begun using a sensory bholakc 16 02 Sep 2011, 04:53
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Political advocacy groups have begun to use information reply2spg 9 19 Jan 2009, 12:48
Over the past 5 years, Company X has posted double-digit leonidas 9 28 Oct 2008, 10:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Over the past decade, many companies have begun using

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.