Conrad,
My recommenders are not clear about the "peer group" and "size of peer group". They are business clients and can compare me with very broad and general (all young executives i have ever known, 1000s of those) or very narrow and specific peer groups (all vendors i work with in a year, 24).
Can you please provide some guidance on this?
Thanks!
CambridgeMBA wrote:
cpandy
I can't comment on Oxford's recommendation form, but at Cambridge, we ask for two references, one a supervisor and the other a peer. The recommenders have to rank candidates on the following factors :-
i. integrity
ii. Ability to work with others
iii. Creativity
iv. Motivation
v. Self-confidence
vi. Analytical Skills
vii. Written Communication Skills
viii. Oral Communication skills
ix. Leadership potential
x. Responsbility for Own Action
xi. Quant numerical skills
Recommenders then have to elaborate or provide concrete examples in any quality that they had rated below average, outstanding or exceptional.
They also describe what they like most and least about the candidate, any particular weaknesses of the candidate when working with supervisors and peers, and what will the candidate be doing in 10 years' time.
The bottomline is that we want to get a better idea of the candidate in the workplace, and how he or she works in groups. At Cambridge, we feel very strongly that collaborative leadership will be the most effective form of leadership as the world becomes more networked so it is very important to find candidates who display such qualities in their workplace.
Conrad Chua
Head Cambridge MBA Admissions
Follow me on Twitter @CambridgeMBA