Hi Guys!

This is my first post here. I applied to both Cambridge and Oxford. I was denied at Cambridge without interview. About Oxford I applied during this last stage whose deadline is now the 10th of June and I did not receive any answer yet. There is few information about this exceptional deadline so I have some doubts. If we get rejected, do they say something? Is anybody in the same situation?

My profile
6 works experience
660GMAT
Healthcare industry

Thanks in advance.

I submitted my application on the 10th of May. However, I received and e-mail on the 17th saying that they received my application but one reference was missing. I pressed my referee and the reference was submitted on that day. So, I can say 18th May.

As in the website it is written that they do not give feedback about denied applications, I do not know if I will receive a communication if I get rejected. Do they send?

Yes. Writing to adcom helps. Otherwise also, I am sure they would definitely respond either affirmative or negative. I dont think "no response" is norm.

-- YM

Congratulations!!

Still waiting on my own decision here.. good to know that the emails are going out.

Congrats vrepets, Kylian!

I also received the admit email an hour ago and looking forward to it!!!

Profile: Canadian-Middle-Eastern/B Eng (high GPA)/M Eng (high GPA)/720/4years blue-chip tech consulting

Anyone planning to attend the Welcome Day event on June 18?

Anyone interviewed for JBS with Dr. Yin? My rejection came just days after the interview. Maybe it was just me but he stress tested and challenged me and asked open ended, none standard questions such as why didn't any philosopher before David Hume develop British skepticism and empiricism. I don't believe he read my essays or profile thoroughly and was asking random questions that struck his fancy. He started off with assuming it was my first time in Hong Kong - I flew to Hong Kong just to meet him - and commenting on my 700 plus gmat score in a derisive tone. He then proceeded to ask about my ten year goal. In my career goal essay, I focused mainly on my short and mid-range goals and mentioned my ten year goal more as a "vision" which to my mind is an ideal, a general direction to strive towards and not a concrete clear cut goal. In all honesty, how many people have mapped out their lives for the next decade and can predict the future so that their long term goals would be consistent with the rapidly changing world? However, Dr. Yin was adamant on hearing a detailed 10 year goal right away. He did not give me the chance to talk about my short or mid-range goals which are realistic and achievable given my background and well thought out. When I gave him the 10 year vision, he flat out rejected it, leaned back in his chair with his hands behind his head in a domineering posture and said there is no logic to my idea, that it’s a moving target and that he is a business trainer himself, what makes me think I can compete with him. He then went on asking what I had learned from courses I took a decade ago in an open ended fashion. In the end when I asked Dr. Yin why he felt that there is no logic to my 10 year vision, he said he isn't familiar with my industry and rushed me out of his office as he let the next interviewee in.

Overall, I am very disappointed with the cavalier attitude with which Dr. Yin conducted the interview. Granted, I showed up to the interview haggard and tired because I flew in early and had to climb hills and staircases for 45 minutes to reach the complex for the interview. I didn’t show up with high energy and didn’t sell my ideas with enthusiasm. If I were in Dr. Yin’s shoes, I probably wouldn’t recommend myself on that day either. However, that does not justify the dismissive and arrogant attitude. I purchased plane tickets, missed my work and flew to Hong Kong to meet him and he did not even thank me for coming. I would understand the confrontational and dismissive tone if this were a job interview. However, this was a graduate school interview and I expected some measure of civility and courtesy. Actually, on second thought, even for profit companies have the decency to thank job applicants for applying and coming to interviews not to mention for this interview I had to pay for the plane tickets and travel expenses out of my own pocket.

I am not bitter about not being accepted by JBS. I was accepted by all the other schools I had applied to, which happen to be all higher ranked. I am however disturbed by the interviewer's arrogance. I hope my experience is an outlier and not the norm.

I'd chalk it up to a personality clash, or perhaps it was due to something he really didn't like after reading your profile. It may even be as simple as an instance of an educator wanting to find out how well an interviewee handles him/herself under pressure and faced with an unsympathetic adversary; we likely deal with difficult people every day in the realm of business, after all. As always, I'm sure there are two sides to this story.

In any case, if your experience with this particular faculty member was that terrible, I'd count my blessings and be grateful that you found this out before you got in, as opposed to afterwards if you choose to matriculate and end up having him as your professor for an important class.

JBS is definitely having admin problems - I'm still amazed that after strongly insisting that candidates travel to Cambridge for their open interview day (with related visa problems) you will only get a 20min interview. Also that the head of admissions is active on our gossip forum. This is pretty unheard of in graduate admissions (PhD, MBA, MD, etc.) I think assigning megalomaniacal interviewers abroad is the same spirit...

If you want to talk about a legit admissions process, I was really impressed with IESE (admit, not matriculating). Really intense assessment day where we broke into teams and prepped/presented cases. But they are a better (rank, post-grad $$$, food) school

hey guys. yeah ive heard some ppl having negative interview experiences at cambridge. Like outstanding candidates but because the interviewer didnt like one answer they were rejected. after flying all the way there. honestly, its cambridge's loss because the people who do well in business are real, normal people who have personality... the robots who answer every question perfectly with their prepared answers might get into cambridge, but those who are successful in the real world are more outspoken in general. The problem with cambridge is many of these "faculty" members who do the interviews have absolutely no idea what it takes to excel in the business world, because they have NEVER been in it. They have been in an academic bubble where they make the rules and study THEORY. i had a great experience at LBS and Oxford. ANd even INSEAD. AT oxford for example i had an interviewer who was an alumn but had also been a banker for several years (like i was)- he knew what to look for.

on another note... are there any american students going to INSEAD or Oxford? if so, do you have any advice on funding and how to go about it... can americans get scholarships at any of these schools, especially this late in the game?