Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 18:44 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 18:44

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Levelx   Modifiersx                  
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 May 2012
Affiliations: UWC
Posts: 314
Own Kudos [?]: 8796 [148]
Given Kudos: 100
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE:Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Current Student
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 360
Own Kudos [?]: 2696 [22]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.7
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [21]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [5]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
3
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
macjas wrote:
A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg

A A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included
B The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included
C Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist including in her exploits the
D Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits are
E The pioneer journalist's exploits of Nellie Bly included


Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:
Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of this sentence is that Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist, and her exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg.

Concepts tested here: Subject-Verb Agreement + Meaning + Modifiers + Verb Forms + Awkwardness/Redundancy

• In a “phrase + comma + noun” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun; this is one of the most frequently tested concepts on GMAT sentence correction.
• The simple past tense is used to refer to events that concluded in the past.

A: This answer choice incorrectly uses "A pioneer journalist" to modify "Nellie Bly's exploits", illogically implying that Nellie Bly's exploits were a pioneering journalist; the intended meaning is that Nellie Bly, herself, was a pioneering journalist; please remember, in a “phrase + comma + noun” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun.

B: Correct. This answer choice correctly refers to the plural noun "exploits" with the verb "included", which can be plural as well as singular. Further, Option B correctly uses "a pioneer journalist" to modify "Nellie Bly" and uses the phrase "The exploits of Nellie Bly...included", conveying the intended meaning - that Nellie Bly, herself, was a pioneering journalist, and her exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg. Additionally, Option B correctly uses the simple past tense verb "included" to refer to an event that concluded in the past.

C: This answer choice incorrectly uses the present participle ("verb+ing" - "including" in this sentence) to refer to an event that concluded in the past; please remember, the simple past tense is used to refer to events that concluded in the past. Further, Option C uses the needlessly wordy construction "Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

D: This answer choice incorrectly uses the plural verb "are" to refer to the singular noun phrase "circling the globe". Further, Option D uses the passive voice construction "Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits are", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

E: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "The pioneer journalist's exploits of Nellie Bly"; the construction of this phrase incorrectly implies that the pioneer journalist and Nellie Bly were two separate people; the intended meaning is that Nellie Bly, herself, was a pioneering journalist.

Hence, B is the best answer choice.

To understand the concept of "Phrase Comma Subject" and "Subject Comma Phrase" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1minute):



To understand the concept of "Simple Tenses" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
General Discussion
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4341
Own Kudos [?]: 30776 [6]
Given Kudos: 632
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
5
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Hi @paras123,

This is the sentence with choice C:

Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist including in her exploits the circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg.

We have a verb-ing modifier “including” here that is modifying the previous noun entity “a pioneer journalist”. Nellie Bly is this pioneer journalist. So “including” is basically modifying Nellie Bly.

Now this modifier does not make sense with the subject “Nellie Bly” here because per this choice, the sentence seems to means that Nellie Bly was a journalist and because of being a journalist she included in her exploits the circling. This is not the intended meaning. It is Bly’s exploits that included the circling. So that should

Also this sentence is not very grammatical. This phrase “the circling the globe” is not grammatical. These are the reasons for this sentence to be incorrect.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 871
Own Kudos [?]: 8553 [8]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
5
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
A pioneer journalist, Nellie Blv's exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg.

(A) A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included >>> Wrong modifier. A pioneer journalist should modify Nellie Bly, not her exploits.
(B) The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included >>> Correct. "a pioneer journalist" is an appositive modifier that modifies Nellie Bly.
(C) Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist including in her exploits the >>> Wrong modifier. "including" modifies "journalist"
(D) Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits are >>> Wrong grammar. "Included in X are Y"
(E) The pioneer journalist's exploits of Nellie Bly included >>> Wrong meaning. "pioneer" is an adjective that modifies Nelly Bly, not the exploits.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [0]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
In matters of modifications or pronoun references, one can't let go logic off the sight. If the appositive 'a pioneer journalist' does not modify Nelly Bly, can it modify 'the exploits', the only other noun, logically?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 153 [0]
Given Kudos: 145
Location: India
GPA: 3.9
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
Hi Expert,

I understand that choice B is the best choice among all the choices. However, I did not understand the usage of "circling the globe" after "included".

The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, --subject
included --verb
circling the globe...--does not seem to be the object

Please help !
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1261
Own Kudos [?]: 1238 [0]
Given Kudos: 1207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
Hi AR15J,

I am not an expert but let me add my two cents.
In option B, circling the globe is a verb-ing modifier modifying
the verb included. Here is the meaning aspect to help you understand better:

The exploits of Nellie Bly ,a pioneer journalist, included (included what?) (you may also erase in between
coma modifier - a pioneer journalist- to understand the sentence structure better)

exploits included two things: circling the globe and that it did faster than Jules Verne’s fictional Phileas Fogg

Hope this helps!

Press kudos if you liked my solution!
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1261
Own Kudos [?]: 1238 [0]
Given Kudos: 1207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
Hi Experts,

Is- Nellie Bly's exploits - noun or adjective?
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Status:Learning
Posts: 876
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [0]
Given Kudos: 755
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
macjas wrote:
A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg

A A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included
B The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included
C Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist, included
D Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits are
E The pioneer journalist's exploits of Nellie Bly included


The modifier"A pioneer journalist " should modify Nellie Bly .
But in the original sentence it is modifying Exploits.
B is the correct answer with correct modifier.
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Status:Learning
Posts: 876
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [1]
Given Kudos: 755
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
1
Kudos
adkikani wrote:
Hi Experts,

Is- Nellie Bly's exploits - noun or adjective?


It is noun .
Nellie Bly's fantastic exploits.
Here fantastic is an adjective of exploits.
Hope it helps.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63649 [0]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Very nice explanations, arvind910619 and adkikani! :thumbup:
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1261
Own Kudos [?]: 1238 [0]
Given Kudos: 1207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
Hi arvind910619

I would like to disagree with your here.
As per my understanding, Nellie Bly's exploits is a possessive noun.

For eg.
A widower Sara's case stirred the courts to provide justice early.

Here a widower can not refer to Sara since it is in possessive form.
I think noun modifier can not refer nouns in this form.

mikemcgarry GMATNinja can you validate my understanding?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 817
Own Kudos [?]: 969 [1]
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
1
Kudos
adkikani wrote:
Hi arvind910619

I would like to disagree with your here.
As per my understanding, Nellie Bly's exploits is a possessive noun.

For eg.
A widower Sara's case stirred the courts to provide justice early.

Here a widower can not refer to Sara since it is in possessive form.
I think noun modifier can not refer nouns in this form.

mikemcgarry GMATNinja can you validate my understanding?


Hello adkikani - You are correct in saying that in the above sentence, "A widower" does not refer to Sara.

However, if you are looking errors in option A, I believe, "A pioneer journalist" in this option refers to "Nellie Bly's exploits" as a whole, or just assume "exploits". This does not make sense.

Hope this clarifies.
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14672 [3]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Hello Everyone!

This is a tricky question that deals with modifiers, so let's dive in! Before we get started, here is the original question any major differences between each option highlighted in orange:

A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg

A. A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included
B. The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included
C. Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist, included
D. Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits are
E. The pioneer journalist's exploits of Nellie Bly included

Since it's clear from the earlier forum discussion that this question focuses on modifiers, let's start there.

To check for modifier problems, you need to ask yourself the following:

1. Is it absolutely clear who/what the modifier is referring to?
2. Is the modifier referring to the correct person/thing in the sentence?
3. Does the modifier placement change the intended meaning in any way?


If the modifier's antecedent is clear and correct, and it doesn't change the overall meaning, it's a properly-placed modifier! Let's take a look at each option, and answer those 3 questions to determine if they are well-placed modifiers:

A. A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included

1. Is it absolutely clear who/what the modifier is referring to? --> YES - it's referring to Nelly Bly's exploits.
2. Is the modifier referring to the correct person/thing in the sentence? --> NO - it should be referring to Nelly Bly, not her exploits!
3. Does the modifier placement change the intended meaning in any way? --> YES - it tells us her exploits were pioneer journalists, which doesn't make logical sense!

This is INCORRECT because the modifier (A pioneer journalist) is referring to Bly's exploits, not to her.

B. The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included

1. Is it absolutely clear who/what the modifier is referring to? --> YES - it's referring to Nelly Bly, who was a pioneer journalist!
2. Is the modifier referring to the correct person/thing in the sentence? --> YES!
3. Does the modifier placement change the intended meaning in any way? --> NO!

This is CORRECT because the modifier (a pioneer journalist) is clearly referring to Nelly Bly, and it's punctuated correctly to indicate it's a modifier!

C. Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist, included

1. Is it absolutely clear who/what the modifier is referring to? --> Yes - the modifier "included" is referring to the word "journalist."
2. Is the modifier referring to the correct person/thing in the sentence? --> NO - the phrase "included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg" should refer to "exploits," which isn't even in this sentence!
3. Does the modifier placement change the intended meaning in any way? --> YES - it removed the idea of Nelly Bly having exploits in her life, including the ones discussed in the sentence!

This option is INCORRECT because it removed the idea of Nelly Bly's "exploits," which them makes the phrase "including circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg" make no sense.

D. Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits are

There is no modifier issue in this sentence. However, this sentence is INCORRECT because it has a subject-verb agreement problem. The sentence only gives us ONE example of the exploits Nelly Bly experienced, but it uses the plural verb "are."

E. The pioneer journalist's exploits of Nellie Bly included

1. Is it absolutely clear who/what the modifier is referring to? --> Yes - it's saying that a pioneer journalist exploited Nelly Bly.
2. Is the modifier referring to the correct person/thing in the sentence? --> NO - the pioneer journalist IS Nelly Bly, not some other person!
3. Does the modifier placement change the intended meaning in any way? --> YES - it completely changes the meaning! It now says that some other journalist exploited Nelly Bly and circled the globe faster than everyone involved!

This is INCORRECT because it drastically changes the meaning of the original sentence.


There you have it - option B is the correct answer because it used the modifier correctly and did not change the intended meaning!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Posts: 187
Own Kudos [?]: 446 [0]
Given Kudos: 115
Location: United States (NC)
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
vnigam21 wrote:
Option C is wrong in the original question, it should be, (the option C should be corrected.)

(C) Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist including in her exploits the


Hi GMATNinja,

This question needs a n edit . The option on choice C is not as it appears in OG.

Request you to edit the option in this case, as there is something to learn from each incorrect choice of OG .

Probus
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63649 [0]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Probus wrote:
vnigam21 wrote:
Option C is wrong in the original question, it should be, (the option C should be corrected.)

b Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist including in her exploits the[/b]


Hi GMATNinja,

This question needs a n edit . The option on choice C is not as it appears in OG.

Request you to edit the option in this case, as there is something to learn from each incorrect choice of OG .

Probus

Fixed! Thanks Probus and vnigam21 for bringing this to our attention.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 365
Own Kudos [?]: 78 [0]
Given Kudos: 832
Send PM
A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
Dear GMATGuruNY MartyTargetTestPrep IanStewart VeritasPrepHailey AjiteshArun DmitryFarber GMATNinja,

Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist including in her exploits the circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg.

Why is the bold part in choice C. wrong?

Here "including" is participle modifier modifying "journalist."
A journalist could very well INCLUDE THE CIRCLING in her exploits. (meaning #2 in https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/include)
Quote:
The team is stronger now they’ve included Roscoe.
Would you include a mobile phone on your list of essentials?
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9239 [1]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
varotkorn wrote:
Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist including in her exploits the circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg.

Why is the bold part in choice C. wrong?

Here "including" is participle modifier modifying "journalist."
A journalist could very well INCLUDE THE CIRCLING in her exploits. (meaning #2 in https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/include)
Quote:
The team is stronger now they’ve included Roscoe.
Would you include a mobile phone on your list of essentials?


Regardless of how you interpret "including" here, you certainly can't say "including in her exploits the circling the globe faster..." because there's an extraneous "the" in there. You could say (if you accept this usage of "including") "including in her exploits circling the globe faster than..."

But I also don't accept this usage of "including" in answer C - her exploits include circling the globe. She doesn't. I suppose if you really try, you can interpret C so that it means something (if you fix the error I point out above) but the writing in answer C should be recognizably terrible. All the words are just jammed together, and it's not clear what goes with what, or what it's even trying to say. The right answer B solves all of those problems. The description of Bly ("a pioneer journalist") is correctly placed and is set off from the main point of the sentence, which is that Bly's exploits included circling the globe quickly. Answer B says what the sentence is trying to say cleanly and directly. Answer C instead seems to make the point of the sentence that "Bly was a pioneer journalist" (that is the subject and verb in C) and then proceeds to illustrate that phrase by mentioning something that has nothing to do with pioneering journalism.

As a general comment about studying SC (to everyone doing that), you should not only be asking why wrong answers are wrong - you should spend as much or more time asking why right answers are right. The right answers to GMAT SC questions normally express complex ideas in the clearest and most precise way, and if you can learn to recognize what that kind of writing looks like, you'll have a much easier time with SC in general.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne