Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 09:25 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 09:25

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Status:Do and Die!!
Posts: 207
Own Kudos [?]: 2134 [0]
Given Kudos: 193
 Q29  V6 GMAT 3: 430  Q31  V19
Send PM
CEO
CEO
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Status: World Rank #4 MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 3187
Own Kudos [?]: 1585 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Status:Do and Die!!
Posts: 207
Own Kudos [?]: 2134 [0]
Given Kudos: 193
 Q29  V6 GMAT 3: 430  Q31  V19
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: M08#36 [#permalink]
GyanOne wrote:
Using (1), X^2 = X
=> X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number
=> X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.


I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92914
Own Kudos [?]: 618961 [1]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: M08#36 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
dandarth1 wrote:
GyanOne wrote:
Using (1), X^2 = X
=> X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number
=> X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.


I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?


Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.

So, if you divide (reduce) \(x^2=x\) by \(x\), you assume, with no ground for it, that \(x\) does not equal to zero thus exclude a possible solution.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 225
Own Kudos [?]: 1372 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE:Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: M08#36 [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
dandarth1 wrote:
GyanOne wrote:
Using (1), X^2 = X
=> X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number
=> X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.


I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?


Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.

So, if you divide (reduce) \(x^2=x\) by \(x\), you assume, with no ground for it, that \(x\) does not equal to zero thus exclude a possible solution.

Hope it's clear.


Hi Bunnel,

How will x=0 satisfy in the 1st equation the possible values for 1st statement are -1 and 2....so not sufficient

statement 2

From statement 2 the possible values are -1, 2 0 .....so not sufficient

Even after combining we have 2 values satisfying the above statements i.e -1 and 2 so Not sufficient
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 520
Own Kudos [?]: 2136 [0]
Given Kudos: 43
WE:Science (Education)
Send PM
Re: M08#36 [#permalink]
GyanOne wrote:
Using (1), X^2 = X
=> X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number
=> X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.


Your equation \(x^2 = x\) is incorrect. It seems that you missed the signs, as in the lefthand side you have \(-1\) and in the righthand side you have \(+1\).
The two don't cancel out.

The correct equation is \(x^2-x-2=0\) or \((x+1)(x-2)=0\), which has two solutions, \(x=-1\) and \(x=2.\)
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: M08#36 [#permalink]
mydreammba wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
GyanOne wrote:
Using (1), X^2 = X
=> X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number
=> X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.


I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?


Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.

So, if you divide (reduce) \(x^2=x\) by \(x\), you assume, with no ground for it, that \(x\) does not equal to zero thus exclude a possible solution.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunnel,

How will x=0 satisfy in the 1st equation the possible values for 1st statement are -1 and 2....so not sufficient

statement 2

From statement 2 the possible values are -1, 2 0 .....so not sufficient

Even after combining we have 2 values satisfying the above statements i.e -1 and 2 so Not sufficient


x=0 won't satisfy the first equation. if ur referring to the rule to not divide by zero that bunuel just mentioned, it applies to the whole expression (x+1) in this problem. you cant divide by (x+1) because it could equal zero, and it does when x=-1...x=0 does not satisfy the equation, so u are correct

Archived Topic
Hi there,
Archived GMAT Club Tests question - no more replies possible.
Where to now? Try our up-to-date Free Adaptive GMAT Club Tests for the latest questions.
Still interested? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for better discussion and related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: M08#36 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92914 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne