gmatbull wrote:
Many retailers advertise price-matching policies, such as, “In the unlikely event that you find an identical
item that you purchased here offered at a lower price in another store, we promise to refund the difference.”
Contrary to what might logically be expected, a recent study finds that the presence of such a policy leads
to a decrease in consumer searches when search costs are low (e.g., when multiple competitor stores are
clustered in a small area), but an increase in consumer searches when search costs are high. These findings
can be explained if a store’s price-matching policies __________.
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?
A. affect consumer search behavior only when information about prices in other stores is unavailable
B. encourage consumers to shop around when there are multiple competitor stores nearby
C. force nearby competitor stores to reduce their prices in order to retain a market share
D. are taken as credible indicators of low prices at the store when and only when it is easy for consumers
to verify them
E. lead to significant increases in consumer searches only for high-price purchases
This is an explain the paradox question.
If search cost is low, you would expect people to search before buying into the policy. If search cost is high, you would expect them not to search. But they do just the opposite. The point is 'why'? You last sentence begins with - these findings can be explained if store's policy ....
So basically you have to look for the option that explains this paradox. Think why would people behave that way? The first thing that came to my mind was that people would assume that if search cost is low, other people have already searched and hence the prices are genuine. If search costs are high, they would expect that other people have not put in the effort to search other stores so they might themselves put in the effort to search for a lower cost before buying. That is what explains the paradox to me.
This leads us to (D).
" price-matching policies are taken as credible indicators of low prices at the store when and only when it is easy for consumers
to verify them"
i.e. people assume that policies are credible when it is easy for customers to verify them i.e. when search cost is low.