sonalchhajed2019 wrote:
B.The French academy in the nineteenth century financially supported a greater number of sculptors than painters, but individual painters received more support, on average than individual sculptors.
I understand that C is correct.
But I want to know whether B could mean the following.
Let's say there are 100 sculptors and 100 painters. The academy supported more sculptors than painters, for eg. 80 sculptors out of a group of 100 sculptors. And in this case, the academy is somehow not encouraging innovation amongst this 80.
Whereas out of a group of 100 painters if the academy supported only 10 ( and that too let's say by providing the maximum support. ) 90 are left unsupported. And because these painters are not related to the academy they can innovate.
If B somehow represents the situation above then B can very explain the discrepancy. Please let me know where I am wrong.
Thank you
Sonal
Keep in mind that we are looking for the answer that "most helps to explain the difference between the amount of innovation" in French painting and sculpture. Since (C) explicitly tells us that
far more unsponsored paintings were produced than unsponsored sculptures, this explains the difference. But what about (B)?
Quote:
(B) The French academy in the nineteenth century financially supported a greater number of sculptors than painters, but individual painters received more support, on average, than individual sculptors.
Notice that (B) doesn't tell us anything about the total number of
unsponsored artists versus the number of
unsponsored sculptors. Nor does it tell us how many artists or sculptors there were total.
In your consideration of (B), you assumed an equal number of artists and sculptors to begin with (i.e. 100 of each). But that assumes that there were an equal number of artists and sculptors, and we definitely can't make that assumption. For instance, what if there were 100 sculptors and only 50 painters? If the academy supported 80 sculptors and 50 painters (i.e. more sculptors than painters), there would still be more
unsupported sculptors than
unsupported painters, and so we'd expect more innovation in sculpture.
Overall, (C) provides a rock-solid explanation for the difference in innovation, so it's correct. Answer choice (B), on the other hand, requires us to make an
assumption for it to explain the difference. So, (B) is incorrect.
I hope that helps!