Harvard 2013 (HBS) - Calling All Applicants

I have been a silent observer (sans account) on this board for a few months now... decided to join today and post because like everyone else above me, I feel like this wait is bruttttallll!!!!

Figured I might as well join in the lamenting and maybe the next two weeks will go by faster! Glad I'm not the only one that has been replaying the interview over and over in my head... can't help but think that I should have replied differently at some points or maybe should have said this, or not said that. Basically just torturing myself!

Anyways - to further give us something to ponder the next 14 days, how do you guys/gals suspect the process goes after the interview? I know the interviewer(s) will do a write-up and then the committee reviews it again, but do you think the interviewer(s) basically put in a recommendation one way or the other (accept/ding), and then it's up to the committee to side with or oppose this recommendation?

Just curious as to how it plays out - whether the person(s) who interviewed us carry more weight in terms of making the decision or whether it really does go back to the committee again for a fresh look at the WHOLE application (vs. focusing just on the interview). Don't mean to rehash an old point as I know this has been discussed previously but it just seems odd that they wouldn't let the interviewer(s) make an initial recommendation and instead go back to square one in terms of re-evaluating all interviewed applicants.

For instance, I think at some other schools each applicant is rated on a point system in different areas, with the interview helping to round out these ratings (meaning that prior the interview there is already some sense of who is a stronger applicant vs. who isn't) - I could be completely wrong but I did recall reading this somewhere.