NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 22:48 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 22:48
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service had the highest

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
TGC
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 587
Own Kudos [?]: 3155 [5]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
Schools: ISB '16 NUS '17 NTU '17 XLRI SMU '17 IIM Lucknow IPMX'16 (A)
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service had the highest [#permalink] New post   19 Jan 2013, 06:33
3
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

39% (01:57) correct 61% (02:19) wrong based on 254 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service had the highest on-time overnight delivery rate of the six major delivery companies in the country. From 2005 to 2006, however, Unlimited Postal Service had the lowest on-time overnight delivery rate of the six major delivery companies. The on-time overnight delivery ranking of the other five companies relative to each other remained unchanged.

Which of the following, if true, would most contribute to an explanation of the facts above?

In early 2005, Unlimited Postal Service stopped taking overnight deliveries after 1:00 PM to ensure that the deliveries would be made according to schedule.

In a drastic cost-cutting measure, Unlimited Postal Service laid off 10 percent of its employees in early 2005.

Unlimited Postal Service implemented a new electronic package tracking system in early 2005 in order to improve delivery speed and efficiency.

In response to cuts to their retirement benefits, Unlimited Postal Service's delivery personnel went on a company-wide strike for all of February 2005.

Although all six delivery companies try to keep their overnight deliveries on schedule, increased security measures at many airports increased delays in deliveries originating in the cities those airports serve.
Source: Veritas Prep
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
D
User avatar
S
Marcab
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4467 [0]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Simon '15 (M$)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service [#permalink] New post   19 Jan 2013, 06:45
Hey man...I thought the answer to be B.
Don't have any idea how D is better than B?
Can we have the OE please.
User avatar
TGC
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 587
Own Kudos [?]: 3155 [0]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
Schools: ISB '16 NUS '17 NTU '17 XLRI SMU '17 IIM Lucknow IPMX'16 (A)
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service [#permalink] New post   19 Jan 2013, 06:56
Marcab wrote:
Hey man...I thought the answer to be B.
Don't have any idea how D is better than B?
Can we have the OE please.


Hi Marcab,

Plz justify (B). as IMO these 10% employees can be of any department.Not certainly from delivery department.

Why not A,Had they closed taking orders after 1:00 PM today they will have less orders to be delivered tomorrow,what say??????
User avatar
plumber250
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 912 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: LBS '14 (A$)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Send PM
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service [#permalink] New post   19 Jan 2013, 08:54
Hi - I agree with Marcab,

B is a good candidate. Please can we have the OE?

A is definietely wrong though. If they stopped taking orders after 1, this would make it more likely the orders they do take being delivered on time goes up. We're talking about 'rate' so % complete not total number.
User avatar
TGC
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 587
Own Kudos [?]: 3155 [1]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
Schools: ISB '16 NUS '17 NTU '17 XLRI SMU '17 IIM Lucknow IPMX'16 (A)
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service [#permalink] New post   19 Jan 2013, 10:10
1
Kudos
Here is OE
Correct Answer: D

This is an 'explain the paradox' question. The correct answer must explain how Unlimited Postal Service went from first to last in on-time overnight delivery rate, even though the other five companies' relative positions stayed the same. Something drastic must have happened to affect Unlimited Parcel Service that did NOT affect the other companies. Answer choice (D) could explain how Unlimited Parcel Service's on-time delivery rate dropped; its delivery personnel were on strike for an entire month while its competitors were operating as normal. Answers (A) and (C) would actually make the paradox even stronger. Answer (B) is irrelevant; we do not know what type of employees were laid off (it might have been only the legal department, which would not affect deliveries). Answer (E) affected all six companies, so it would not explain how only Unlimited Parcel Service's on-time delivery ranking changed.
User avatar
L
carcass
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4380
Own Kudos [?]: 32864 [0]
Given Kudos: 4453
Send PM
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service [#permalink] New post   19 Jan 2013, 10:28
Ok but in D we have a strike but this could not affect the rate because the strike take place on february and we have a lower rate that reflect an entire year........

i'm skeptical with this question, telling the truth
User avatar
plumber250
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 912 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: LBS '14 (A$)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Send PM
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service [#permalink] New post   19 Jan 2013, 10:29
I agree with Carcass,

Dodgy question.
User avatar
L
carcass
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4380
Own Kudos [?]: 32864 [0]
Given Kudos: 4453
Send PM
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service [#permalink] New post   19 Jan 2013, 10:41
plumber250 wrote:
I agree with Carcass,

Dodgy question.



@Plumber

Moreover the OE says that the 10% of the laided off are employees that do not impact on the rate.

Ok here is the trick: never do an assumption or an inference on a gmat question (as general rule) BUT here my common sense tells me that this group (our 10%) for logic are employees that IMPACT the rate, lowering it

To make a long story short, from the question: I could think that this 10% are employees that affect the rate as well as \(NOT\)
User avatar
notrandom
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Dec 2011
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 271 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service had the highest [#permalink] New post   04 Nov 2013, 11:20
B) In a drastic cost-cutting measure, Unlimited Postal Service laid off 10 percent of its employees in early 2005.
Employees is too broad a term. It includes delivery personnel + other employees. So we don't know whether 10% were delivery personnel or others. Also, since we are bothered about on-time delivery rate we need something that affects that rate specifically - Wrong

D) In response to cuts to their retirement benefits, Unlimited Postal Service's delivery personnel went on a company-wide strike for all of February 2005.
Bang on! Two things to notice - first this statement directly addresses the issue at hand - low on-time rate - and links it to the delivery personnel.
Second- the period covered is from 2005-2006 (12 months - a short period) and if out of those 12 months, your employees are not working for 1 month, while the employees of the other 5 major companies are, it will affect you overall on-time rate. - Correct
User avatar
D
abhishekdadarwal2009
Director
Director
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 552
Own Kudos [?]: 436 [0]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service had the highest [#permalink] New post   09 Mar 2017, 09:59
From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service had the highest on-time overnight delivery rate of the six major delivery companies in the country. From 2005 to 2006, however, Unlimited Postal Service had the lowest on-time overnight delivery rate of the six major delivery companies. The on-time overnight delivery ranking of the other five companies relative to each other remained unchanged.

Which of the following, if true, would most contribute to an explanation of the facts above?

In early 2005, Unlimited Postal Service stopped taking overnight deliveries after 1:00 PM to ensure that the deliveries would be made according to schedule.

In a drastic cost-cutting measure, Unlimited Postal Service laid off 10 percent of its employees in early 2005.

Unlimited Postal Service implemented a new electronic package tracking system in early 2005 in order to improve delivery speed and efficiency.

In response to cuts to their retirement benefits, Unlimited Postal Service's delivery personnel went on a company-wide strike for all of February 2005.

Although all six delivery companies try to keep their overnight deliveries on schedule, increased security measures at many airports increased delays in deliveries originating in the cities those airports serve.




By the process of elimination ,Option A, C and E are clearly out of scope.

Option B:10 % emploees were fired,but from where or which department? lets assume there are 10 departments and 10 employees in each department and 1 is fired from each department.How much would be the impact...?we are not sure how much.so we keep this on hold.

Option D:Employees from the delivery department went on strike, that means all the rest of the departments were working which includes the employees from the department that collects the post to be deliverd.That means the Unlimited Postal services collected post for one month but did not deliver any for entire 1 month that means the ontime delivery rate reduced by 8.3% directly.

Option D is better detailed and provides a better reason while addressing the paradox in the facts provided.

User avatar
G
goforgmat
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 261
Own Kudos [?]: 88 [0]
Given Kudos: 233
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
Schools: Booth '21 (D) Cambridge "21 (D) LBS '22 (D)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service had the highest [#permalink] New post   09 Mar 2017, 12:06
carcass wrote:
plumber250 wrote:
I agree with Carcass,

Dodgy question.



@Plumber

Moreover the OE says that the 10% of the laided off are employees that do not impact on the rate.

Ok here is the trick: never do an assumption or an inference on a gmat question (as general rule) BUT here my common sense tells me that this group (our 10%) for logic are employees that IMPACT the rate, lowering it

To make a long story short, from the question: I could think that this 10% are employees that affect the rate as well as \(NOT\)


I picked A .
carcass - this is a question we should skip ?
avatar
B
dg88074
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 28
GPA: 3.86
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service had the highest [#permalink] New post   08 Apr 2017, 08:49
The answer is D. The last line of the question stem is the key to solving. The on-time overnight delivery ranking of the other five companies relative to each other remained unchanged. This means that the delivery companies were handling roughly the similar distribution of workload. If Unlimited postal failed to make deliveries in Feb, then this would cause it to slip to the last ranking.
User avatar
VerbalBot
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17207
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service had the highest [#permalink] New post   18 Aug 2022, 20:17
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: From 2004 to 2005, Unlimited Postal Service had the highest [#permalink]
18 Aug 2022, 20:17
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions