NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 10:55 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 10:55
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
 1   2   
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
G
mikemcgarry
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [74]
Given Kudos: 130
Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 17 Jun 2021, 08:50
10
Kudos
64
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (01:21) correct 47% (01:23) wrong based on 2153 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to him.

(A) such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to
(B) such a sweeping command in World War I that no single WWII general would be a correspondence with
(C) so sweeping a command in World War I as no single WWII general would be corresponding to
(D) so sweeping a command in World War I that no single WWII general corresponds to
(E) such a sweeping command in World War I because no single WWII general corresponds with

In this sentence about Blackjack Pershing, the same root word appears in noun & verb forms (correspondence, corresponds, corresponding). For a full discussion of this frequent SC issue, as well as a complete explanation of the sentence above, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/active-verbs-on-the-gmat/

Mike :-)
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
D

Originally posted by mikemcgarry on 22 Jan 2013, 15:06.
Last edited by Bunuel on 17 Jun 2021, 08:50, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
G
mikemcgarry
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [22]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   14 Jul 2014, 11:40
15
Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
himanshujovi wrote:
Got the right answer but confused by the usage of the word correspond. What does this sentence mean anyway Mike ?

Dear himanshujovi,
I'm happy to help. :-)

This is a sentence with hard vocabulary and a sophisticated meaning. It is a very hard sentence, but something like this could appear on the GMAT SC. Here's the OA, version (D):

Five-star General John Pershing had so sweeping a command in World War I that no single WWII general corresponds to him.

OK, what does this mean? First of all, "sweeping" in this context means "vast, unlimited." Having a "sweeping command" means having virtually unlimited power, having tremendous authority. Pershing was the "top dog" in the US military in WWI. That's the first fact communicated in this sentence.

Now, you asked about the word "correspond." A correspondence is a pattern of matching. X corresponds to Y if X & Y are each in their own pattern, and the two patterns match, X and Y are at matching points in the two patterns.

For example, in the US, the President, corresponds to the Prime Minister in many other countries. They have different titles but the same essential role.

The CEO of a corporation corresponds to the president or chancellor of a university.

One could say that the movements of a symphony correspond to the chapters of a book --- both play the same role of dividing the word into meaningful sections.

One could say that the Eiffel Tower, the iconic landmark of France, corresponds to the Taj Mahal, the iconic landmark of India. They both correspond to the Statue of Liberty in the USA or to the Great Wall of China. It's not clear which single German landmark or single Japanese landmark would most correspond with these.

Here, in this SC question, the pattern of matching concerns the first and the second World War.

If we ask: who was the #1 most important military leader in the US military in WWI? The answer is clearly and unambiguously John Pershing.

If we ask: who was the #1 most important military leader in the US military in WWII? Well, there's not really a clear answer. Many generals were important --- Eisenhower, Patton, Bradley, MacArthur, as well as Admiral Nimitz, etc., but there was none who stood out as the supreme leader, the way Pershing did in WWI. In other words, no WWII leader corresponds to Pershing. Pershing had a specific role in WWI, and nobody had a matching role in WWII.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
L
carcass
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4384
Own Kudos [?]: 32877 [5]
Given Kudos: 4455
Send PM
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   22 Jan 2013, 15:53
2
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
mikemcgarry wrote:
Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to him.
(A) such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to
(B) such a sweeping command in World War I that no single WWII general would be a correspondence with
(C) so sweeping a command in World War I as no single WWII general would be corresponding to
(D) so sweeping a command in World War I that no single WWII general corresponds to
(E) such a sweeping command in World War I because no single WWII general corresponds with

In this sentence about Blackjack Pershing, the same root word appears in noun & verb forms (correspondence, corresponds, corresponding). For a full discussion of this frequent SC issue, as well as a complete explanation of the sentence above, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/active-verbs-on-the-gmat/

Mike :-)


with him is wrong, right is \(TO\)him. only based on this we have A C and D

such a is wrong

would be is wrong. we are comparing X that \(IS\) Y ( a matter of fact)

D is the best
General Discussion
avatar
skiingforthewknds
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2012
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 295 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   23 Jan 2013, 15:58
2
Kudos
I just couldn't convince myself that so sweeping was correct...that sounds terrible.
User avatar
G
mikemcgarry
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   23 Jan 2013, 16:30
Expert Reply
skiingforthewknds wrote:
I just couldn't convince myself that so sweeping was correct...that sounds terrible.

Dear skiingforthewknds,
With all due respect, this is why it's vitally important to do high-brow reading in preparation for the GMAT. If your ear is tuned, say, to the level of grammar present in most modern media, then you are completely set up to make a sizable number of errors on the GMAT SC simply by following your ear, and many fully correct grammatical structures will sound "wrong" as well. It's very important to "re-train" your ear in correct grammar ---- the GMAT SC is designed to excoriate folks who uncritically trust what they hear in colloquial English.
Does this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
B
WaterFlowsUp
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Status:Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Posts: 337
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [4]
Given Kudos: 92
Location: United States (DE)
GPA: 3.32
WE:Information Technology (Health Care)
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   25 Sep 2013, 10:32
4
Bookmarks
Bumping for review and further discussion*.

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE

Theory on Comparison:

Theory Articles on GMATCLUB


free-concept-as-like-and-as-vs-like-from-e-gmat-133427.html#p1090454
as-vs-like-correct-and-incorrect-usages-133950.html#p1092922
how-far-ellipsis-is-permissible-in-comparison-148973.html#p1193647

Theory Articles on Magoosh Blog


https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-sente ... omparison/
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... -vs-fewer/

Theory Article on grammer-quizzes.com


https://www.grammar-quizzes.com/like-as.html
User avatar
Maksym
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2012
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 90 [1]
Given Kudos: 46
Send PM
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   13 Jul 2014, 07:14
1
Kudos
skiingforthewknds wrote:
I just couldn't convince myself that so sweeping was correct...that sounds terrible.


Great question!

....so sweeping.... sounds terrible for me as well (however, i'm not a native speaker, so could be wrong).
Mike, thanks for your advice re high-brow reading!

But I guess the author of this question realised this and intentionally pasted 5 different options to the second part of the sentence (correspondence with / correspondence to etc).
And four out of these five could be rather easily eliminated. So, in my opinion, this question could be answered even w/o analysing the first construction
avatar
himanshujovi
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 141
Own Kudos [?]: 74 [0]
Given Kudos: 46
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   14 Jul 2014, 01:47
Got the right answer but confused by the usage of the word correspond. What does this sentence mean anyway Mike ?
avatar
vietmoi999
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 70 [2]
Given Kudos: 27
Send PM
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   16 Jul 2014, 08:10
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
mikemcgarry wrote:
Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to him.
(A) such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to
(B) such a sweeping command in World War I that no single WWII general would be a correspondence with
(C) so sweeping a command in World War I as no single WWII general would be corresponding to
(D) so sweeping a command in World War I that no single WWII general corresponds to
(E) such a sweeping command in World War I because no single WWII general corresponds with

In this sentence about Blackjack Pershing, the same root word appears in noun & verb forms (correspondence, corresponds, corresponding). For a full discussion of this frequent SC issue, as well as a complete explanation of the sentence above, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/active-verbs-on-the-gmat/

Mike :-)


pls, confirm my idea following
A. to talk of result the idiom is "such ... that" . this is not idiom
B. after "such... that" we can not use "would". PLS ADVISE WHAT TENSE WE USE IN SUCH.. THAT CLAUSE.
C. "so...that" is idiom. this is not idiom
E, the causal relation is not correct inhere
User avatar
G
mikemcgarry
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [5]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   16 Jul 2014, 10:12
2
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
vietmoi999 wrote:
mikemcgarry wrote:
Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to him.
(A) such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to
(B) such a sweeping command in World War I that no single WWII general would be a correspondence with
(C) so sweeping a command in World War I as no single WWII general would be corresponding to
(D) so sweeping a command in World War I that no single WWII general corresponds to
(E) such a sweeping command in World War I because no single WWII general corresponds with

In this sentence about Blackjack Pershing, the same root word appears in noun & verb forms (correspondence, corresponds, corresponding). For a full discussion of this frequent SC issue, as well as a complete explanation of the sentence above, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/active-verbs-on-the-gmat/

Mike :-)


pls, confirm my idea following
A. to talk of result the idiom is "such ... that" . this is not idiom
B. after "such... that" we can not use "would". PLS ADVISE WHAT TENSE WE USE IN SUCH.. THAT CLAUSE.
C. "so...that" is idiom. this is not idiom
E, the causal relation is not correct inhere

Dear vietmoi999,
I'm happy to respond. :-) On (A) & (C) & (E), you are 100% correct. In (B), there is no rule about a "that" clause and verb tense --- we simply have to use the verb tense relevant to the situation. If we were talking hypothetically, say about a future war, then we might use "would." WWII was a long time ago, and all the achievements of those generals is well known at this point. There is absolutely nothing hypothetical, speculative, or ambiguous about what those folks accomplished. That's why "would" is wrong. Here, we are taking about a correspondence, a pattern of matching, and this pattern is something we are perceiving in the present moment, so the present tense --- "does correspond" or simply "corresponds" is perfectly correct.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
RatneshS
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 May 2014
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 30 [0]
Given Kudos: 296
Location: India
Schools: Mannheim"17
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.44
Send PM
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   27 Jun 2016, 19:23
mikemcgarry wrote:
skiingforthewknds wrote:
I just couldn't convince myself that so sweeping was correct...that sounds terrible.

Dear skiingforthewknds,
With all due respect, this is why it's vitally important to do high-brow reading in preparation for the GMAT. If your ear is tuned, say, to the level of grammar present in most modern media, then you are completely set up to make a sizable number of errors on the GMAT SC simply by following your ear, and many fully correct grammatical structures will sound "wrong" as well. It's very important to "re-train" your ear in correct grammar ---- the GMAT SC is designed to excoriate folks who uncritically trust what they hear in colloquial English.
Does this make sense?
Mike :-)



Going by grammar
Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to him.

since had is there therefore we want a past action in any other part of sentence
also I have read that with present=will and with past=would

I didnt find any past tense in all 5 sentences so went with B because it atleast used would.

Mike Please acknowledge
User avatar
G
mikemcgarry
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   28 Jun 2016, 10:26
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
RatneshS wrote:
Going by grammar
Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to him.

since had is there therefore we want a past action in any other part of sentence
also I have read that with present=will and with past=would

I didnt find any past tense in all 5 sentences so went with B because it atleast used would.

Mike Please acknowledge

Dear RatneshS,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

Unfortunately, (B) is not the correct answer. It is grammatically correct, but it has logical and rhetorical issues. Folks often mistakenly think that the GMAT SC is a solely a test of grammar. In fact, grammar and logic and rhetoric are three equally important strands, and on official questions, many incorrect answer are 100% grammatically correct but have logical or rhetorical issues.

Verb tense is not a particularly good indicator in this instance. You see, the actions of these generals were all in the past, but the logical pattern, the correspondence, is something that still exists today. For example, we can say, "Ataturk corresponds to George Washington in the primary significance he has for the country he founded." The two men, Ataturk and Washington, are long dead, but the significance they have for their respective countries and the logical relationship between them is one that still exists.

When we say, "P corresponds to Q," we are saying that there a logical pattern of matching that joins them. It is 100% incorrect to say, "P is a correspondence to Q," because then we are identifying the person P with the abstract logical pattern of matching. This is the problem with choice (B) in this question. We are saying no general, no human being, is a correspondence, an abstract pattern of matching. This is illogical and it sounds awkward.

The best answer here is (D). Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :-)
User avatar
L
Mo2men
RSM Erasmus Moderator
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 2461
Own Kudos [?]: 1360 [0]
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   28 Jun 2016, 11:38
mikemcgarry wrote:
Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to him.
(A) such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to
(B) such a sweeping command in World War I that no single WWII general would be a correspondence with
(C) so sweeping a command in World War I as no single WWII general would be corresponding to
(D) so sweeping a command in World War I that no single WWII general corresponds to
(E) such a sweeping command in World War I because no single WWII general corresponds with

In this sentence about Blackjack Pershing, the same root word appears in noun & verb forms (correspondence, corresponds, corresponding). For a full discussion of this frequent SC issue, as well as a complete explanation of the sentence above, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/active-verbs-on-the-gmat/

Mike :-)


Hi Mike,

Although I was able to solve the sentence correctly, I'd like your support to understand a construction appeared in choice D.

Regardless of construction 'SO/Such X that Y', I do not understand the construction 'sweeping a command'. Usually the construction is 'a + adjective+ noun' but in Choice D, it is 'adjective+ a + noun'. When is the latter construction is correct?


Thanks
User avatar
G
mikemcgarry
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   28 Jun 2016, 13:34
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Mo2men wrote:
mikemcgarry wrote:
Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to him.
(A) such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to
(B) such a sweeping command in World War I that no single WWII general would be a correspondence with
(C) so sweeping a command in World War I as no single WWII general would be corresponding to
(D) so sweeping a command in World War I that no single WWII general corresponds to
(E) such a sweeping command in World War I because no single WWII general corresponds with

In this sentence about Blackjack Pershing, the same root word appears in noun & verb forms (correspondence, corresponds, corresponding). For a full discussion of this frequent SC issue, as well as a complete explanation of the sentence above, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/active-verbs-on-the-gmat/

Mike :-)


Hi Mike,

Although I was able to solve the sentence correctly, I'd like your support to understand a construction appeared in choice D.

Regardless of construction 'SO/Such X that Y', I do not understand the construction 'sweeping a command'. Usually the construction is 'a + adjective+ noun' but in Choice D, it is 'adjective+ a + noun'. When is the latter construction is correct?


Thanks

Dear Mo2men,
My friend, I'm happy to respond. :-)

The core grammatical structure here is so [adjective] that . . . The clause following the "that" is a consequence of the degree of the adjective. See:
GMAT Idioms: Cause and Consequence
Examples
...so intelligent that she completed a Ph.D. at the age of 19.
...so hungry that he ate an entire baked chicken.
...so distant that light reflected from it takes 20 minutes to arrive.

That's the core structure. Now, suppose this adjective, the very one that is raised to an extreme degree by the word "so," modifies a noun. Idiomatically, it is crucial that the adjective touch the word "so." Normally, as you point out, an article would come before an adjective, but here, the requirements of the idiom take over. The word "so" must touch the adjective: as a consequence, we wind up with the somewhat unusual structure:
so [adjective] a/an [noun] that . . .
Examples:
Theodore Roosevelt was so dynamic a politician that . . .
Kazakhstan is so large a country that . . .
Algebraic topology is so abstruse a topic that . . .

In fact, that noun could be modified by a noun-modifying phrase or clause, and this would put significant distance between the opening "so" and the closing "that" of the idiom.
Beethoven was so popular a concert pianist in Vienna in the 1790s that . . .
The electron is so small a particle, even compared to the other subatomic particles, that . . .

This is the structure used in this sentence: "so sweeping a command in World War I that ..." It is relatively uncommon in colloquial English and appears more frequently in sophisticated writing.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
L
Mo2men
RSM Erasmus Moderator
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 2461
Own Kudos [?]: 1360 [0]
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   28 Jun 2016, 18:26
mikemcgarry wrote:
Dear Mo2men,
My friend, I'm happy to respond. :-)

The core grammatical structure here is so [adjective] that . . . The clause following the "that" is a consequence of the degree of the adjective. See:
GMAT Idioms: Cause and Consequence
Examples
...so intelligent that she completed a Ph.D. at the age of 19.
...so hungry that he ate an entire baked chicken.
...so distant that light reflected from it takes 20 minutes to arrive.

That's the core structure. Now, suppose this adjective, the very one that is raised to an extreme degree by the word "so," modifies a noun. Idiomatically, it is crucial that the adjective touch the word "so." Normally, as you point out, an article would come before an adjective, but here, the requirements of the idiom take over. The word "so" must touch the adjective: as a consequence, we wind up with the somewhat unusual structure:
so [adjective] a/an [noun] that . . .
Examples:
Theodore Roosevelt was so dynamic a politician that . . .
Kazakhstan is so large a country that . . .
Algebraic topology is so abstruse a topic that . . .

In fact, that noun could be modified by a noun-modifying phrase or clause, and this would put significant distance between the opening "so" and the closing "that" of the idiom.
Beethoven was so popular a concert pianist in Vienna in the 1790s that . . .
The electron is so small a particle, even compared to the other subatomic particles, that . . .

This is the structure used in this sentence: "so sweeping a command in World War I that ..." It is relatively uncommon in colloquial English and appears more frequently in sophisticated writing.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)



Thanks Mike for you help. I'm just curious to know whether there is any preference (rhetorically or subtle meaning) to say:

So sweeping a command in World War I that....

or

Such a sweeping command in World War I that......


Thanks
User avatar
G
mikemcgarry
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   29 Jun 2016, 10:30
Expert Reply
Mo2men wrote:
Thanks Mike for you help. I'm just curious to know whether there is any preference (rhetorically or subtle meaning) to say:

So sweeping a command in World War I that....

or

Such a sweeping command in World War I that......


Thanks

Dear Mo2men,
I'm happy to respond, my friend. :-)

Both versions are 100% correct and communicate virtually the same information. If anything, the former gives slightly more emphasis to the adjective itself. Suppose, in the second version, we were to put the word "sweeping" in italics to give it a bit of extra emphasis. That's roughly the extra emphasis that version #1 gives the adjective.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
S
leanhdung
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 172
Own Kudos [?]: 149 [1]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   17 Jul 2017, 20:29
1
Bookmarks
Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to him.

(A) such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to
(B) such a sweeping command in World War I that no single WWII general would be a correspondence with
(C) so sweeping a command in World War I as no single WWII general would be corresponding to
(D) so sweeping a command in World War I that no single WWII general corresponds to
(E) such a sweeping command in World War I because no single WWII general corresponds with
User avatar
L
aragonn
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1267
Own Kudos [?]: 5650 [1]
Given Kudos: 416
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   05 Sep 2018, 06:16
1
Bookmarks

Official Explanation


Split #1: noun vs. verb. The noun “correspondence” appears in choices (A) & (B), and the verb forms “corresponding” and “corresponds” appear in choices (C) & (D) & (E). This is not conclusive, but we suspect the correct answer will be among these latter three.

Split #2: the idiom with “correspond”. Both the verb “to correspond” and the noun “correspondence” take the preposition “to” when we are talking about a “correspondence” in the sense of a pattern of matching, as we are here. (We would speak of a “correspondence with” someone if we were talking about an exchange of communication.) Here, we need the preposition “to” — choices (A) & (C) & (D) have this correct preposition, but choices (B) & (E) make the mistake of using “with”, so these two are incorrect.

Split #3: the “such” & “so” construction. One correct idiom is “such a [noun] that” — here, the construction “such a sweeping command in WWI that” —- only choice (B) has this version correct. Another correct idiom is “so [adjective] that” or “so [adjective] a [noun] that” — here, we would need the construction “so sweeping a command in WWI that” —- only choice (D) correctly follows this idiom. The other three choices don’t follow either of these idioms correctly.

The only possible answer is (D).

FAQ: What is the difference between "corresponds to" and "corresponds with?"

The verb "correspond" has two meanings:

To be in agreement, harmony, or conformity; to be similar or equivalent in character.
To communicate by letter, usually over a period of time.
If we want to say that one thing is similar to another, we need to use "corresponds to" and if we want to say that one person was communicating with another, we use "corresponds with".

We are using the first definition, "to be similar in character" in our sentence, because we want to say that no WWII general could compare to General John Pershing. Hence, the correct version of the sentence has to have the "corresponds to" structure.
avatar
B
Mpuneet
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2018
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   01 Mar 2019, 01:25
E is very obviously wrong, as it gives something from World War II as a reason for something from World War I. This is logically impossible and incorrect. ‘Correspondence with’ is incorrect, it should be corresponds or correspondence to, so B is also incorrect. Tense is incorrect in C and correspondence to is a very awkward phrasing, so the correct answer must be D.
User avatar
P
Crytiocanalyst
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 994
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 309
Send PM
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink] New post   05 Aug 2021, 06:42
mikemcgarry wrote:
Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to him.


(A) such a sweeping command in World War I as no single WWII general is a correspondence to
Since the comparison tell us that none had the same sweeping power as John pershing the corresponds to is the correct usage

(B) such a sweeping command in World War I that no single WWII general would be a correspondence with
When dealing with comparison it is either there exists or not there is no significance of would be

(C) so sweeping a command in World War I as no single WWII general would be corresponding to
This gives us the reasoning the commanders in world war 2 wants to make comparison between them and the general

(D) so sweeping a command in World War I that no single WWII general corresponds to
This is the exact reasoning we were looking for let us hang to it

(E) such a sweeping command in World War I because no single WWII general corresponds with
because in this argument conveys wrong meaning and is completely unnecessary

Therefore IMO D
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Five-star General John Pershing had such a sweeping command [#permalink]
05 Aug 2021, 06:42
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions