Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 01:14 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 01:14

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [12]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14815
Own Kudos [?]: 64888 [8]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2012
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Posts: 38
Own Kudos [?]: 85 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: The number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city dec [#permalink]
GC14 wrote:
The number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city decreased significantly from one year to the next. Epidemiologists attributed this decline to the closing of a coal plant on the outskirts of the city; coal fumes have long been believed to cause acute lung inflammation that can lead to the contraction of tuberculosis.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the epidemiologists' explanation for the decrease in tuberculosis diagnoses?

A. Due to a new medical technique introduced into the city this year, many people who would have been diagnosed with tuberculosis are now correctly diagnosed with emphysema.

B. The coal plant near the city closed, at least in part, because it was found to be polluting the air with particles that are dangerous when breathed.

C. Of those diagnosed with tuberculosis last year, a large number received immediate medical treatment that halted the progression of the disease.

D. Neighboring cities that are located farther from the closed coal plant did not observe decreases in tuberculosis diagnoses this year as compared to last year.

E. Although one large coal plant closed, there are still several smaller coal plants in operation within the borders of the city.

OA , after some discussion

Edit: by carcass


Epidemiologists conclusion is that the closing of the coal plant is responsible for significant reduction is the no of people diagnosed with tuberculosis.

Prethinking :- we have to find some other factor that is responsible for reduction

POE :-
Option A :- Correct, this option states that closing of coal factory has not reduced the number.
Option B :- The reason for the closing of coal factory is out of scope
Option C :- This option although provide reasons for reduction in no of persons diagnosed, does not weaken the conclusion. this option can be considered as an additional factor along with the closing of factory. Hence this is not the correct answer.
Option D :- talks about cities that are farther from factory, so out of scope
Option E :- talks about other smaller plants still in operation, so out of scope.

IMO :- A
avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 294
Own Kudos [?]: 153 [0]
Given Kudos: 41
Location: European union
Send PM
Re: The number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city dec [#permalink]
Why not E ??

zthere are other coal factories in town which means that coal factories themselves are not the cause od the desease...
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 912 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: LBS '14 (A$)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Send PM
Re: The number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city dec [#permalink]
Hi Ivan,

It's actually irrelevant about the other plants. Hence others saying it is 'out of scope'.

We're looking at cause and effect between the big plant and the TB. As the amount of coal power is going down (the answer does not say there were new power plants...), then if coal is a cause of TB, then TB should go down too, even if some other plants exist.

Answer A as others have pointed out provides much more compelling evidence.

James
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 May 2015
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: The number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city dec [#permalink]
A. Due to a new medical technique introduced into the city this year, many people who would have been diagnosed with tuberculosis are now correctly diagnosed with emphysema.

--This could certainly be a reason for the decreased number of tuberculosis diagnoses.Correct.

B. The coal plant near the city closed, at least in part, because it was found to be polluting the air with particles that are dangerous when breathed.

--strengthens explanation for the decrease in tuberculosis diagnoses

C. Of those diagnosed with tuberculosis last year, a large number received immediate medical treatment that halted the progression of the disease.

--talks about last year,not releavant

D. Neighboring cities that are located farther from the closed coal plant did not observe decreases in tuberculosis diagnoses this year as compared to last year.

--strengthens explanation for the decrease in tuberculosis diagnoses

E. Although one large coal plant closed, there are still several smaller coal plants in operation within the borders of the city.

--This is out of scope too.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Jul 2019
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 34 [0]
Given Kudos: 93
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V40
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Re: The number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city dec [#permalink]
Hi,

I have a doubt. The question states:

The number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city decreased significantly from one year to the next.
Epidemiologists attributed this decline to the closing of a coal plant on the outskirts of the city;


- The question stem does not mention that the number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city decreased significantly this year
,it only mentions from one year to the next.

This is the reason I eliminated Options A & C, and chose E as it seemed to be within scope.

Could you please clarify?
GMATNinja
VeritasKarishma
plumber250

Thanks!
Tutor
Joined: 30 Jan 2019
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Re: The number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city dec [#permalink]
Expert Reply
TYPE: WEAKEN
DIFFICULTY: EASY



A. Due to a new medical technique introduced into the city this year, many people who would have been diagnosed with tuberculosis are now correctly diagnosed with emphysema. ----- Correct. We are using a cause effect relationship. So this statement says that the cause for the reduction in TBC cases could actually be to this cause (the new medical diagnosis) and, therefore, no to the cause mentioned in the stimulus (closing of the coal plant).

B. The coal plant near the city closed, at least in part, because it was found to be polluting the air with particles that are dangerous when breathed. ------ OUT OF SCOPE. The reason why the coal plant closed is unimportant.

C. Of those diagnosed with tuberculosis last year, a large number received immediate medical treatment that halted the progression of the disease. ------- This does not explain the fluctuation from year to year.

D. Neighboring cities that are located farther from the closed coal plant did not observe decreases in tuberculosis diagnoses this year as compared to last year. -------- Wrong way. This could actually strengthen the conclusion, because it implies that something unusual happened in this city, and that's why they are getting different results. The closing of the coal plant could be that "something unusual".

E. Although one large coal plant closed, there are still several smaller coal plants in operation within the borders of the city. ---- This does not weaken because it does not analyze the cause-effect relationship.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14815
Own Kudos [?]: 64888 [2]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: The number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city dec [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Resh16 wrote:
Hi,

I have a doubt. The question states:

The number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city decreased significantly from one year to the next.
Epidemiologists attributed this decline to the closing of a coal plant on the outskirts of the city;


- The question stem does not mention that the number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city decreased significantly this year
,it only mentions from one year to the next.

This is the reason I eliminated Options A & C, and chose E as it seemed to be within scope.

Could you please clarify?
GMATNinja
VeritasKarishma
plumber250

Thanks!


I understand your concern and agree that the question or option (A) should have been better worded. Unknown source questions often have this problem. Just focus on the logic and move on.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The number of people diagnosed with tuberculosis in a certain city dec [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne