Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 20:47 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 20:47

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Status:Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Posts: 442
Own Kudos [?]: 5415 [9]
Given Kudos: 82
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 85
Own Kudos [?]: 83 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Posts: 65
Own Kudos [?]: 280 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
WE:Marketing (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 589
Own Kudos [?]: 1519 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Vercules wrote:
Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long time on the misuse of fossil fuels, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing a rapid depletion of these resources. Though predictions vary, many fossil fuel experts believe that all the Earth’s fossil fuels will be consumed by the next century. Such an event would cause a global shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions of people.

Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels.
B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the use of fossil fuels.
C) Global shutdown of industries and equipments that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth.
D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century.
E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels.

OA and OE after discussions


Premise:human activity is causing a rapid depletion of fossil fuels and all the Earth’s fossil fuels will be consumed by the next century
Conclusion: Such an event would cause a global shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions of people.

We need to look for the choice whose negation (i) is an additional premise which negates the conclusion or (ii) which reduces the force of the premise.

The negation of choice A which is "New technological developments in the next century will create a substitute for fossil fuels.", is an additional premise which negates the conclusion.

None of the other choices does that. So choice A.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 43
Own Kudos [?]: 283 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Correct answer is A.

A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels. this is the correct assumption because if new substitutes are not created then, finally the fossil fuels will any how get over.
B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to REDUCED the use of fossil fuels. Incorrect. Even if the fossil fuel consumption is reduced, the consumption will continue and will lead to its end. Best trap answer. note the word REDUCED.
C) Global shutdown of industries and equipments that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth. Not relevent
D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century. Not relevent
E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels. directly stated from the premise. not an assumption.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Status:Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Posts: 734
Own Kudos [?]: 1857 [1]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti [#permalink]
1
Kudos
anish123ster wrote:
Correct answer is A.

A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels. this is the correct assumption because if new substitutes are not created then, finally the fossil fuels will any how get over.
B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to REDUCED the use of fossil fuels. Incorrect. Even if the fossil fuel consumption is reduced, the consumption will continue and will lead to its end. Best trap answer. note the word REDUCED.
C) Global shutdown of industries and equipments that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth. Not relevent
D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century. Not relevent
E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels. directly stated from the premise. not an assumption.


Tons of kudos to you man....gr8 differentiation pointed out .....surely thats the hinge.....

Archit
avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 294
Own Kudos [?]: 154 [0]
Given Kudos: 41
Location: European union
Send PM
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti [#permalink]
Chose A without even reading the other options. 34 seconds in total ;)))
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Status:Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Posts: 442
Own Kudos [?]: 5415 [0]
Given Kudos: 82
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Send PM
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Vercules wrote:
Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long time on the misuse of fossil fuels, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing a rapid depletion of these resources. Though predictions vary, many fossil fuel experts believe that all the Earth’s fossil fuels will be consumed by the next century. Such an event would cause a global shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions of people.

Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels.
B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the use of fossil fuels.
C) Global shutdown of industries and equipment that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth.
D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century.
E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels.


Hi Guys,

Updating the post with OA and OE.

The argument concludes that depletion of fossil fuels caused by human activity will shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions. Any assumption in support of this conclusion would have to corroborate that these events will definitively take place..


(A) New technological developments in the next century will not create a substitute for fossil fuels.

Correct. If new technological developments in the next century allow people to come up with an alternative for fossil fuels, then industries and equipment that use fossil fuels will not shut down. Thus, a necessary assumption is that these technologies will not be developed.

(B) Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the use of fossil fuels.

A simple awareness of the steps to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels in no way undermines the argument’s conclusion, as this answer choice does not describe any action being taken by individuals.

(C) Global shutdown of industries and equipments that use fossil fuels will similarly affect all parts of the Earth.

The argument never suggests that all parts of the Earth will be similarly affected; this choice is too extreme and overreaching for the argument’s conclusion.

(D) Some fossil fuel experts predict that the fossil fuels will be completely depleted even earlier than during the next century.

This might be true, but it is not an assumption on which the conclusion rests. Instead, this answer choice is simply an inference that might be drawn from the premises. This a good example of a choice which can be true based on the stimulus but not actually a valid assumption.

(E) Human activity is the sole cause of depleting fossil fuels.

The idea that human activity is the sole cause of fossil fuel depletion is neither suggested nor assumed by the argument. In addition, the wording "sole cause" is too extreme.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2018
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 98
Location: India
GPA: 3.7
Send PM
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti [#permalink]
Hello,

I have a question regarding the answer choices A and B
I selected B because my reasoning to reject B was as follows:
negate A and we get: New technological developments in the next century will create a substitute for fossil fuels.
My thought process: Even if substitutes were created we dont know if the current industries are equipped to work with the new substitutes for fossil fuels and they can still be closed down and based on this thought process I rejected A.

Although I do agree after reading the comments that B is the best answer. Have I taken my thought process too far when rejecting A?

Regards
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6072
Own Kudos [?]: 4689 [0]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti [#permalink]
skorada wrote:
Hello,

I have a question regarding the answer choices A and B
I selected B because my reasoning to reject B was as follows:
negate A and we get: New technological developments in the next century will create a substitute for fossil fuels.
My thought process: Even if substitutes were created we dont know if the current industries are equipped to work with the new substitutes for fossil fuels and they can still be closed down and based on this thought process I rejected A.

Although I do agree after reading the comments that B is the best answer. Have I taken my thought process too far when rejecting A?

Regards

The highlighted part in my opinion is far fetched reasoning.. :)
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Posts: 521
Own Kudos [?]: 1034 [0]
Given Kudos: 1091
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Send PM
Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti [#permalink]
GMATNinja the conclusion is that "Such an event would cause a global shut down of all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, disturbing habitat and resources for survival for billions of people. "

when the conclusion says habitat and resources for survival for billions of people will be disturbed by shutting down all the industries and equipments that use fossil fuels, my understanding was that this implication would be towards people who work in such industries and of course the rest of the world.

in A, even if new technological developments in the next century create a substitute for fossil fuels how can we assumethat this new tech will also recreate the habitat and jobs for the people who lost them cus of shut down of the fossil industry?
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17213
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Even though there has been significant scientific debate for a long ti [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne