Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 03:54 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 03:54

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Tutor
Joined: 27 Jan 2013
Posts: 257
Own Kudos [?]: 627 [11]
Given Kudos: 38
GMAT 1: 760 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V47
GMAT 3: 780 Q49 V51
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Apr 2013
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 61
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 27 Jan 2013
Posts: 257
Own Kudos [?]: 627 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
GMAT 1: 760 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V47
GMAT 3: 780 Q49 V51
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 137
Own Kudos [?]: 675 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Re: The Economist Reading Comprehension Challenge #3 [#permalink]
HerrGrau wrote:
Hi,

Thank you for participating! I agree with what you are saying but answer E also says that these people think the system should be modified. That is not stated in the passage. This is half right and half wrong. B goes along with the idea that university can make money off of the students and not share the money with the students. This is supported in the passage. Let me know if you have any further questions on this. I should be posting a new article this week.

Happy Studies,

HG


retailingvnsupernova wrote:
Hi HerrGrau, please explain to me why the answer in question 1 is B , not E.
In my opinion, because the article says, in the 4th paragraph, that ".....defenders of the system say that is plenty", the defenders would most likely agree with the idea of not paying students more than a free education, they are not concerned with the university maximizing profit. My answer is E

Hi,


Thank you.



Hi

Could you pleae let me know what is the issue with D? as passage is saying free education is nothing compare to money student athlete make so it should be more. Please clarify this.

Thanks
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 343
Own Kudos [?]: 4586 [0]
Given Kudos: 606
Concentration: Technology, Other
Send PM
Re: The Economist Reading Comprehension Challenge #3 [#permalink]
Top Contributor
The supporters of not paying student athletes would most likely agree with which of the following statements?

A. A university should maximize profit only if that profit is used to improve the quality of that university’s education
B. A university can maximise profit derived from students and not be morally obliged to share the profit with the students
C. There should be a limit imposed on the amount of profit that a university can make from student athletes
D. Student athletes should not only be compensated with a free education
>>Many do get a free education, as well as room and board, a package that can be worth more than $50,000 a year. Defenders of the system say that is plenty.
E. Although the current rules governing student athletes should be modified, student athletes should not receive more than a free education in compensation for their participation in university athletics.

For me it was between B & D but I marked D. However after re-reading the Q, B seems to be a better option.

10 mins for overall passage.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2016
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: The Economist Reading Comprehension Challenge #3 [#permalink]
Can anyone explain the answer to the third question. The passage doesn't mention about anything related to the univ policy.
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: The Economist Reading Comprehension Challenge #3 [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Shreyaa21 wrote:
Can anyone explain the answer to the third question. The passage doesn't mention about anything related to the univ policy.


Option C states "regardless of university policy", implying that it does not matter what the university policy is - it is forbidden, as per strict NCAA rules, to pay a student athlete. Hence it is not required to know what the university policy is or even to mention about the university policy in the passage.
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1115
Own Kudos [?]: 2163 [2]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: The Economist Reading Comprehension Challenge #3 [#permalink]
2
Kudos
My Answers:

1. B - A university can maximize profit derived from students and not be morally obliged to share the profit with the students

Reasoning: The supporters believe a free education + board + room package are sufficient

2. A. Athletes who no longer participate in university athletics may benefit financially.

Reasoning: It is stated that "former college athletes" are the ones who are disputing the NCAA, so one can infer that these athletes would have a claim. I believe it is stated that "such a deal" may require revenue to be set aside to pay "ex-players".

3. D. be supported in that decision by most athletes

Had a tougher time with 3 - but I see no evidence against D.

Edit*: I see that C should be the correct answer to 3 as it is stated in para. 4 of the article.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 May 2019
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: The Economist Reading Comprehension Challenge #3 [#permalink]
Hello Sir,
i am not able to read Economists (RCs) articles due to non-subscription of the economist news/magazine. Is it possible for me to read these articles and attempt RC questions?

please help me out!

Rahul
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: The Economist Reading Comprehension Challenge #3 [#permalink]
" Such a deal might set aside a portion of the revenue generated by elite college sports to pay ex-players and create a trust to compensate current student athletes when they graduate. "

For ques 2, why not " E. Current players would profit more than past players regardless of the length of time participating in the athletics program. "
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 May 2019
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
Send PM
Re: The Economist Reading Comprehension Challenge #3 [#permalink]
Why answer to 2nd ques is not C
If deal is approved then NCCC will have to revise the rules of compensation naa?
As it is mentioned in the passage upending the system?

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The Economist Reading Comprehension Challenge #3 [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13958 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne