HarveyS wrote:
Demographers generally divide urban and suburban areas not into individual cities and towns, separated by political boundaries, but into "metropolitan statistical areas," each of which comprises multiple cities and towns with interdependent economies.
(A) divide urban and suburban areas not into individual cities and towns, separated by political boundaries, but into "metropolitan statistical areas," each of which comprises multiple cities and towns with
(B) do not divide urban or suburban areas into individual cities and towns, which are separated by political boundaries, but instead into "metropolitan statistical areas," each of which comprise multiple cities and towns having
(C) do not divide urban and suburban areas into individual cities and towns, separated according to political boundaries, but instead group them into "metropolitan statistical areas," each of which having multiple cities and towns with
(D) divide urban and suburban areas not into individual cities and towns that are separated by political boundaries, and instead into "metropolitan statistical areas," each comprising multiple cities and towns that have
(E) divide urban or suburban areas not into individual cities and towns, separating them according to political boundaries; instead, they group them into "metropolitan statistical areas," each made up of multiple cities and towns having
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
According to the sentence, demographers prefer to divide urban and suburban areas according to "
metropolitan statistical areas" rather than along city and town boundaries. These two methods should appear in a parallel structure, with proper transitions to convey the idea that demographers largely use one method and not the other. Like any other sentence, this sentence must be grammatically and idiomatically correct; it also must use modifiers that convey the proper meaning.
(A) CORRECT. The two ways in which demographers could potentially divide urban areas are properly expressed in parallel, using the transitions
not and
but. In addition, the modifier "
separated by political boundaries" is properly used to modify "
cities and towns", and the modifier "
with interdependent economies" is properly used to describe the second instance of "
cities and towns".
(B) This version lacks proper parallelism: the parallel marker not is followed by a verb phrase (divide...), but its counterpart but is followed only by a prepositional phrase. The use of or to connect urban and suburban areas is inappropriate, as it is clear from context that demographers consider urban and suburban areas, together, in determining metropolitan statistical areas. The singular subject each of which does not agree with the plural verb comprise. Finally, the participial modifier "having" illogically suggests a temporary state; in context, it should be understood that the economies of the cities and towns in a single metropolitan statistical area are interdependent, in a way that is essentially permanent.
(C) The parallel structure do not divide urban and suburban areas ... but (instead) group them ... is properly constructed, but conveys the wrong meaning: the parallel structure suggests that "them" refers to urban and suburban areas, but demographers do not group entire urban and suburban areas; they group interconnected cities and towns. Additionally, the relative pronoun each of which must be the subject of a verb; here, it is followed only by a modifier ("having..."), making this version a fragment.
(D) The construction not ... and ... is unidiomatic, and also fails to convey the contrast between demographers' use of one method and their lack of use of the other. The modifier that are separated... (an essential modifier) wrongly implies that only some cities and towns are separated by political boundaries; this modifier describes something that is universally true of cities and towns, and so should be written as a nonessential modifier.
(E) Here, the portion preceding the semicolon is not a properly constructed clause: If not is used without a parallel structure, then it must modify a verb. If not is used as it is here, to modify a prepositional phrase, then it must appear in parallel to something else. The parallel structure do not divide urban or suburban areas ... but (instead) group them ... is properly constructed, but conveys the wrong meaning: the parallel structure suggests that "them" refers to urban [and] suburban areas, but demographers do not group entire urban and suburban areas; they group interconnected cities and towns. In addition, the use of or to connect urban and suburban areas is inappropriate, as it is clear from context that demographers consider urban and suburban areas, together, in determining metropolitan statistical areas. Finally, the participial modifier "having" illogically suggests a temporary state; in context, it should be understood that the economies of the cities and towns in a single metropolitan statistical area are interdependent, in a way that is essentially permanent.