TirthankarP wrote:
The emotional impact of separation on unmarried “committed” couples is just as great as the emotional impact of divorce on married couples; in both situations, the loss of a trusted companion deals an emotional blow of great magnitude. Yet statistics show that a person who has separated from his or her partner in even a long-term non-marital relationship is very likely to enter into another such relationship.
Which one of the following statements represents the most logical inference that can be drawn from the statements above?
A) People do not base decisions about relationships solely on the threat of their negative emotional impact.
B) People are not likely to enter into serious relationships if they have failed at them in the past.
C) People are more affected by a divorce from a spouse than they are by the loss of a friend.
D) People often expect that a breakup from a non-spousal partner will merely be temporary.
E) People treat their romantic involvements and their friendships quite differently.
POE worked well here.
A) People do not base decisions about relationships solely on the threat of their negative emotional impact.
CORRECT.B) People are not likely to enter into serious relationships if they have failed at them in the past.
WRONG.just opposite of the argument.(stats showing opposite results)
C) People are more affected by a divorce from a spouse than they are by the loss of a friend.
WRONG.argument saying it is going to affect in the same manner emotionlly.
D) People often expect that a breakup from a non-spousal partner will merely be temporary.
WRONG.no if thats true then stats is wrong as people get engage with other partner.
E) People treat their romantic involvements and their friendships quite differently.
WRONG.we cant infer that.
HENCE A