NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 06:04 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 06:04
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
 1   2   
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
L
generis
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35485 [364]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
CAT Tests
Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 09 Feb 2023, 02:40
23
Kudos
337
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

60% (01:33) correct 40% (01:34) wrong based on 8750 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

(A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like

(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

(C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like

(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

(E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like

SC19060.02

Show Spoiler

JOURNAL ARTICLE
How Dinosaurs Ran
R. McNeill Alexander
Scientific American
Vol. 264, No. 4 (APRIL 1991), pp. 130-137
Published by: Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24936872
Page Count: 8

The graph proved to be even more illuminating because it soon occurred to me that I could use it to estimate the speed of dinosaurs from the stride lengths shown by their footprints. Rath­er surprisingly, great numbers of di­nosaur footprints have survived as im­pressions in mud that turned to stone [see "The Footprints of Extinct Ani­mals," by David]. Mossman and Wil­liam A. S. Sarjeant; SCIENTIFIC AMERI­CAN, March 1983]. These tracks show that dinosaurs walked with their feet directly under their bodies like mammals and birds, not sprawled out to either side in the manner of modern reptiles. Consequently, the relation be­tween relative stride length and Froude number for mammals should also ap­ply to dinosaurs. In contrast, estimat­ing dinosaur speed by comparing these giants with modern reptiles would not be appropriate.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
D

Originally posted by generis on 20 Apr 2020, 22:35.
Last edited by Bunuel on 09 Feb 2023, 02:40, edited 2 times in total.
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63652 [120]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   12 May 2020, 15:06
69
Kudos
51
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Quote:
(A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

The first thing I notice is "them," which has to refer to a plural noun, but there's no plural noun that works here. "Tracks?" Nope. The dinosaur tracks don't show "tracks" walking. A pronoun can be ambiguous, but it cannot be incoherent. So (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Same problem as (A), but with "they" instead of "them."

Quote:
(C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This one fixes the pronoun issue - "them" can refer to "dinosaurs," but now we've got a meaning problem. This version makes it sound as though the tracks literally showed dinosaurs walking, the way, say, a video might show a toddler walking. That would be neat, but it's not terribly logical. The tracks give us information that allows us to see that the dinosaurs walked a certain way. But we don't get to see the walking itself.

There's also a problem with the usage of "like" here. Remember, "like" has to compare nouns. What nouns are compared? "Mammals and birds" to "their bodies?" That doesn't make sense. It seems far more logical to compare actions: how dinosaurs walked to how mammals and birds do. When comparing actions, we'd want to use "as," so that's another strike against (C).

Quote:
(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This looks okay. We have the plural "dinosaurs" for "they" to refer to. "As" properly compares actions. No other issues are jumping out, let's hang on to this one.

Quote:
(E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Again, it seems as though the tracks are literally displaying dinosaurs walking. Worse, the dinosaurs appear to be walking now. And then we've also got "like" illogically comparing "mammals and birds" to their bodies," as opposed to (D), which uses "as" to compare actions.

So (D) it is.
User avatar
D
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 1691
Own Kudos [?]: 14673 [24]
Given Kudos: 766
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   23 Jul 2020, 17:04
15
Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Hello Everyone!

Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow down our options quickly so we know how to answer questions like this when they pop up on the GMAT! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences between the options in orange:

[u]Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like[/b] mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

(A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like

(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

(C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like

(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

(E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like

After a quick glance over the options, we have 2 main areas we can focus on:

1. How each option begins (Clarity / Verb Tense)
2. like vs. as do (Idioms & Comparisons)

Since #2 is an either/or split, let’s start there because it’ll eliminate 2-3 options rather quickly. We need to make sure we’re creating a parallel comparison. This sentence is intended to compare the actions of dinosaurs walking with the actions of mammals and birds walking. Let’s see how each option handles this:

(A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like

(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

(C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like

(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

(E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like

We can eliminate options A, C, & E because “like” is only used to compare two things, whereas “as do” is used to compare two actions. Since we’re supposed to compare the two walking styles, which are actions, we need to stick with “as do.” Now that we have it narrowed down to only 2 options, let’s focus on clarity:

(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do
This is INCORRECT because the pronoun “they” is referring back to “dinosaur tracks,” which makes no logical sense. Tracks cannot walk. The pronoun needs a clearer antecedent (dinosaurs, perhaps?).

(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do
This is CORRECT! By naming the dinosaurs earlier in the sentence, we can use the pronoun “they” here because it can be clearly attributed to the dinosaur, not the tracks.

There you have it - option D is our winner! By starting with an easier “either/or” split, we were able to narrow down our options quickly, leaving us more time to focus on more complex issues!

Don’t study for the GMAT. Train for it.
User avatar
L
chetan2u
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11166
Own Kudos [?]: 31882 [10]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   11 May 2020, 22:29
6
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
generis wrote:
Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like

B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like

D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like

SC19060.02



The main errors..

A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like
'Dinosaur tracks' seems to be a name of a track rather than showing possession.. Also, the THEIR in under their bodies does not modify singular dinosaur and illogically points to tracks. There can be many more appropriate ways to use this phrase.
LIKE shows comparison between NOUNs, and it does not fit in here. We are likely comparing actions by dinosaurs and mammals & birds.

B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do
'as do' is correctly used, but it wrongly compares dinosaur tracks with mammals & birds.
'Dinosaur tracks' seems to be a name of a track rather than showing possession.. Also, the THEIR in under their bodies and THEY do not modify singular dinosaur and illogically points to tracks.

C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like
Clears the pronoun ambiguity, but construction is not proper.
We are comparing two actions, one by Diosaurs and other by mammals and birds, so LIKE is wrong.

D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do
Pronoun ambiguity is removed in this choice. Also 'as do' is correctly used for comparing two actions. CORRECT

E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like
Like is wrong..
Poorly constructed -- In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking

D
General Discussion
User avatar
B
Mandeep1357
Tutor
Joined: 07 Oct 2019
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [4]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   05 Jul 2020, 16:44
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

(A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like

(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

(C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like

(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

(E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like

If we compare first few words and last few words,

In A and B, we have "Dinosaur" and in C, D and E, we have "Dinosaurs", its singular-plural noun error.
In A, plural pronoun "them" refers to singular noun "Dinosaur"......Eliminate
In B, plural pronoun "they" refers to singular noun "Dinosaur"......Eliminate

If we look at last few words in C, D and E
We have a split of "Like" vs "As"...."Like" is used to compare nouns and "As" is used to compare Actions


Here we are comparing "How dinosaurs walked" with "how mammals and birds walk", we are comparing actions. We need "As" to compare actions.
Eliminate C and E.

Hence, D is the correct answer.
avatar
B
kumaraaa
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   15 Jul 2021, 01:17
GMATNinja wrote:
yatindra20 wrote:
Please help in this Difficult question GMATNINJA

Plenty of nice juicy errors in this one...

Quote:
(A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

The first thing I notice is "them," which has to refer to a plural noun, but there's no plural noun that works here. "Tracks?" Nope. The dinosaur tracks don't show "tracks" walking. A pronoun can be ambiguous, but it cannot be incoherent. So (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Same problem as (A), but with "they" instead of "them."

Quote:
(C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This one fixes the pronoun issue - "them" can refer to "dinosaurs," but now we've got a meaning problem. This version makes it sound as though the tracks literally showed dinosaurs walking, the way, say, a video might show a toddler walking. That would be neat, but it's not terribly logical. The tracks give us information that allows us to see that the dinosaurs walked a certain way. But we don't get to see the walking itself.

There's also a problem with the usage of "like" here. Remember, "like" has to compare nouns. What nouns are compared? "Mammals and birds" to "their bodies?" That doesn't make sense. It seems far more logical to compare actions: how dinosaurs walked to how mammals and birds do. When comparing actions, we'd want to use "as," so that's another strike against (C).

Quote:
(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This looks okay. We have the plural "dinosaurs" for "they" to refer to. "As" properly compares actions. No other issues are jumping out, let's hang on to this one.

Quote:
(E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Again, it seems as though the tracks are literally displaying dinosaurs walking. Worse, the dinosaurs appear to be walking now. And then we've also got "like" illogically comparing "mammals and birds" to their bodies," as opposed to (D), which uses "as" to compare actions.

So (D) it is.


GMATNinja, please address my below query:
While I understand that C is wrong due to meaning issue, I am still not able to get why "Like" can't be used here to compare "Mammals and birds" with "Dinosaur".
User avatar
S
ahsanashfaq28
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2014
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 49 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy
Schools: Darden '21 (D) Kelley '21 (A) Broad '21 (A) Kellogg '24 (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.77
WE:Engineering (Consumer Products)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   16 Jul 2021, 06:39
not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles


Is extended modifying mammals and birds?
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63652 [1]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   12 Aug 2021, 12:27
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
kumaraaa wrote:
GMATNinja, please address my below query:
While I understand that C is wrong due to meaning issue, I am still not able to get why "Like" can't be used here to compare "Mammals and birds" with "Dinosaur".

If "like" is used to compare dinosaurs to mammals and birds in (C) it would distort the meaning of the sentence.

Think about the intended comparison: the author is trying to say that dinosaurs are similar to mammals/birds in that they all walk with their feet directly under them.

Let's rearrange (C) a bit so that your suggested comparison is more clear:

    "Dinosaurs, like mammals and birds, left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles."

This DOESN'T say that dinos, mammals, and birds are similar because they walked in the same way. Instead, it says that they are similar because they all left certain kinds of tracks.

So the use of "like" isn't quite right in (C).

(D), on the other hand, very clearly compares how dinos walk with how mammals/birds walk.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63652 [0]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   13 Aug 2021, 07:20
Expert Reply
ahsanashfaq28 wrote:
not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles


Is extended modifying mammals and birds?

Mammals and birds themselves can't really be "extended" (unless something very strange is going on), so we know that "extended" doesn't modify mammals and birds.

Instead, the author is trying to describe the position of the feet of various animals.

The feet of dinosaurs were "directly under their bodies," while the feet of modern reptiles are "extended out to the side."

So, "extended" is just describing the position of reptiles' feet when they walk.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
S
Rasalghul853
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2019
Posts: 148
Own Kudos [?]: 40 [0]
Given Kudos: 85
Location: India
Schools: McCombs '25 (S) McDonough '25 (A$)
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V39
GPA: 2.81
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   31 Aug 2021, 13:49
GMATNinja wrote:
yatindra20 wrote:
Please help in this Difficult question GMATNINJA

Plenty of nice juicy errors in this one...

Quote:
(A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

The first thing I notice is "them," which has to refer to a plural noun, but there's no plural noun that works here. "Tracks?" Nope. The dinosaur tracks don't show "tracks" walking. A pronoun can be ambiguous, but it cannot be incoherent. So (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Same problem as (A), but with "they" instead of "them."

Quote:
(C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This one fixes the pronoun issue - "them" can refer to "dinosaurs," but now we've got a meaning problem. This version makes it sound as though the tracks literally showed dinosaurs walking, the way, say, a video might show a toddler walking. That would be neat, but it's not terribly logical. The tracks give us information that allows us to see that the dinosaurs walked a certain way. But we don't get to see the walking itself.

There's also a problem with the usage of "like" here. Remember, "like" has to compare nouns. What nouns are compared? "Mammals and birds" to "their bodies?" That doesn't make sense. It seems far more logical to compare actions: how dinosaurs walked to how mammals and birds do. When comparing actions, we'd want to use "as," so that's another strike against (C).

Quote:
(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This looks okay. We have the plural "dinosaurs" for "they" to refer to. "As" properly compares actions. No other issues are jumping out, let's hang on to this one.

Quote:
(E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Again, it seems as though the tracks are literally displaying dinosaurs walking. Worse, the dinosaurs appear to be walking now. And then we've also got "like" illogically comparing "mammals and birds" to their bodies," as opposed to (D), which uses "as" to compare actions.

So (D) it is.


But is D parallel? A show X not Y. Here X and Y are not parallel. Please rectify where I have gone wrong.
User avatar
L
egmat
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4344
Own Kudos [?]: 30781 [1]
Given Kudos: 634
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   31 Aug 2021, 15:35
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
But is D parallel? A show X not Y. Here X and Y are not parallel. Please rectify where I have gone wrong.[/quote]


Hello Rasalghul853,

I will be glad to help you with this one. :-)

Choice D is perfectly parallel in the comparison that it presents. The sentence intends to compare dinosaurs with mammals and birds. Why these entities have been compared? They have been compared because they all walked or walk with their feet under their bodies, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles. This is common in all t these entities, not only in dinosaurs. This is the intended logical meaning.

From the grammatical standpoint, there is no parallelism in "A show X not Y". There is no parallelism marker here, so there is no list here.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
B
nikitamaheshwari
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 131
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   03 Sep 2021, 23:11
GMATNinja wrote:
yatindra20 wrote:
Please help in this Difficult question GMATNINJA

Plenty of nice juicy errors in this one...

Quote:
(A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

The first thing I notice is "them," which has to refer to a plural noun, but there's no plural noun that works here. "Tracks?" Nope. The dinosaur tracks don't show "tracks" walking. A pronoun can be ambiguous, but it cannot be incoherent. So (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Same problem as (A), but with "they" instead of "them."

Quote:
(C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This one fixes the pronoun issue - "them" can refer to "dinosaurs," but now we've got a meaning problem. This version makes it sound as though the tracks literally showed dinosaurs walking, the way, say, a video might show a toddler walking. That would be neat, but it's not terribly logical. The tracks give us information that allows us to see that the dinosaurs walked a certain way. But we don't get to see the walking itself.

There's also a problem with the usage of "like" here. Remember, "like" has to compare nouns. What nouns are compared? "Mammals and birds" to "their bodies?" That doesn't make sense. It seems far more logical to compare actions: how dinosaurs walked to how mammals and birds do. When comparing actions, we'd want to use "as," so that's another strike against (C).

Quote:
(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This looks okay. We have the plural "dinosaurs" for "they" to refer to. "As" properly compares actions. No other issues are jumping out, let's hang on to this one.

Quote:
(E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Again, it seems as though the tracks are literally displaying dinosaurs walking. Worse, the dinosaurs appear to be walking now. And then we've also got "like" illogically comparing "mammals and birds" to their bodies," as opposed to (D), which uses "as" to compare actions.


So (D) it is.


Can "do" in Option choice D refer to "walked". How can do refer to past tense walked here?
User avatar
P
kittle
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2021
Posts: 272
Own Kudos [?]: 115 [0]
Given Kudos: 446
Send PM
CAT Tests
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   12 Sep 2021, 18:37
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
(A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

The first thing I notice is "them," which has to refer to a plural noun, but there's no plural noun that works here. "Tracks?" Nope. The dinosaur tracks don't show "tracks" walking. A pronoun can be ambiguous, but it cannot be incoherent. So (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Same problem as (A), but with "they" instead of "them."

Quote:
(C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This one fixes the pronoun issue - "them" can refer to "dinosaurs," but now we've got a meaning problem. This version makes it sound as though the tracks literally showed dinosaurs walking, the way, say, a video might show a toddler walking. That would be neat, but it's not terribly logical. The tracks give us information that allows us to see that the dinosaurs walked a certain way. But we don't get to see the walking itself.

There's also a problem with the usage of "like" here. Remember, "like" has to compare nouns. What nouns are compared? "Mammals and birds" to "their bodies?" That doesn't make sense. It seems far more logical to compare actions: how dinosaurs walked to how mammals and birds do. When comparing actions, we'd want to use "as," so that's another strike against (C).

Quote:
(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This looks okay. We have the plural "dinosaurs" for "they" to refer to. "As" properly compares actions. No other issues are jumping out, let's hang on to this one.

Quote:
(E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Again, it seems as though the tracks are literally displaying dinosaurs walking. Worse, the dinosaurs appear to be walking now. And then we've also got "like" illogically comparing "mammals and birds" to their bodies," as opposed to (D), which uses "as" to compare actions.

So (D) it is.




Hey GMATNinja - don't you think that in choices C and E, the comparison is between "dinosaurs" and "birds and mammals" as when separated using a comma, the like compares what follows it with the subject of the sentence. Eg: Natural satellites do not have light of their own, like the planets. In this sentence, noun entities are compared.
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63652 [1]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   17 Sep 2021, 15:52
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
kittle wrote:
Hey GMATNinja - don't you think that in choices C and E, the comparison is between "dinosaurs" and "birds and mammals" as when separated using a comma, the like compares what follows it with the subject of the sentence. Eg: Natural satellites do not have light of their own, like the planets. In this sentence, noun entities are compared.

That sample sentence is a good example of a construction that might not be definitively wrong, but creates a problematic meaning.

If you wrote, "Natural satellites, like the planets, do not generate their own light," it would be crystal clear that you were comparing the satellites to the planets and that both do not generate their own light.

But in that sample version, it sounds as though the "planets" might be compared to the "light" itself, meaning that satellites don't create planet-like light. Can a reader eventually figure out what's intended? Maybe. But the GMAT would likely frown on the confusion or illogical meaning.

Also, even if you didn't treat the usage of "like" as a definitive error in (C) and (E), each of those options has another logical problem. All you need is one concrete error to get rid of an option, so there'd be no need to agonize over the "like."

I hope that clears things up a bit!
User avatar
B
sid0791
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2020
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   03 Oct 2021, 02:36
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
(A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

The first thing I notice is "them," which has to refer to a plural noun, but there's no plural noun that works here. "Tracks?" Nope. The dinosaur tracks don't show "tracks" walking. A pronoun can be ambiguous, but it cannot be incoherent. So (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Same problem as (A), but with "they" instead of "them."

Quote:
(C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This one fixes the pronoun issue - "them" can refer to "dinosaurs," but now we've got a meaning problem. This version makes it sound as though the tracks literally showed dinosaurs walking, the way, say, a video might show a toddler walking. That would be neat, but it's not terribly logical. The tracks give us information that allows us to see that the dinosaurs walked a certain way. But we don't get to see the walking itself.

There's also a problem with the usage of "like" here. Remember, "like" has to compare nouns. What nouns are compared? "Mammals and birds" to "their bodies?" That doesn't make sense. It seems far more logical to compare actions: how dinosaurs walked to how mammals and birds do. When comparing actions, we'd want to use "as," so that's another strike against (C).

Quote:
(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This looks okay. We have the plural "dinosaurs" for "they" to refer to. "As" properly compares actions. No other issues are jumping out, let's hang on to this one.

Quote:
(E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Again, it seems as though the tracks are literally displaying dinosaurs walking. Worse, the dinosaurs appear to be walking now. And then we've also got "like" illogically comparing "mammals and birds" to their bodies," as opposed to (D), which uses "as" to compare actions.

So (D) it is.


Hi GMATNinja

In D, doesn't it seem like, that Dinasours purposefully left the tracks?
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63652 [1]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   06 Oct 2021, 11:40
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
sid0791 wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
(A) Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

The first thing I notice is "them," which has to refer to a plural noun, but there's no plural noun that works here. "Tracks?" Nope. The dinosaur tracks don't show "tracks" walking. A pronoun can be ambiguous, but it cannot be incoherent. So (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) Dinosaur tracks show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Same problem as (A), but with "they" instead of "them."

Quote:
(C) Dinosaurs left tracks that showed them walking with their feet directly under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This one fixes the pronoun issue - "them" can refer to "dinosaurs," but now we've got a meaning problem. This version makes it sound as though the tracks literally showed dinosaurs walking, the way, say, a video might show a toddler walking. That would be neat, but it's not terribly logical. The tracks give us information that allows us to see that the dinosaurs walked a certain way. But we don't get to see the walking itself.

There's also a problem with the usage of "like" here. Remember, "like" has to compare nouns. What nouns are compared? "Mammals and birds" to "their bodies?" That doesn't make sense. It seems far more logical to compare actions: how dinosaurs walked to how mammals and birds do. When comparing actions, we'd want to use "as," so that's another strike against (C).

Quote:
(D) The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

This looks okay. We have the plural "dinosaurs" for "they" to refer to. "As" properly compares actions. No other issues are jumping out, let's hang on to this one.

Quote:
(E) In the tracks they left, dinosaurs are shown walking with their feet under their bodies, like mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Again, it seems as though the tracks are literally displaying dinosaurs walking. Worse, the dinosaurs appear to be walking now. And then we've also got "like" illogically comparing "mammals and birds" to their bodies," as opposed to (D), which uses "as" to compare actions.

So (D) it is.


Hi GMATNinja

In D, doesn't it seem like, that Dinasours purposefully left the tracks?

Nah. If a thief leaves behind fingerprints we wouldn't think he'd done so intentionally. Same thing if an animal leaves behind tracks. Living things leave traces of their presence. No reason to believe it's intentional. (If the phrase had been, "Dinosaurs left tracks to show," then you'd have an argument. But that's not what we have.)

I hope that clears things up!
User avatar
G
Rickooreo
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2021
Posts: 316
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: ISB '24 Moore '25
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.95
WE:Real Estate (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   02 Sep 2022, 01:06
egmat KarishmaB GMATNinja EMPOWERgmatVerbal

In Option D - that dinosaurs left - this is a relative clause which we eliminate while analysing sentence, so the sentence will look like
The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

Implying that tracks show that tracks walked?

Another way to look at this can be they can refer to either tracks or dinosaurs. The subject of option D is tracks and hence it is referring to tracks
User avatar
L
ExpertsGlobal5
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   02 Sep 2022, 04:33
Expert Reply
Rickooreo wrote:
egmat KarishmaB GMATNinja EMPOWERgmatVerbal

In Option D - that dinosaurs left - this is a relative clause which we eliminate while analysing sentence, so the sentence will look like
The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do

Implying that tracks show that tracks walked?

Another way to look at this can be they can refer to either tracks or dinosaurs. The subject of option D is tracks and hence it is referring to tracks


Hello Rickooreo,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, Option D does not imply that the tracks walked; remember, pronoun ambiguity is only a concern if there are multiple nouns that the pronoun can logically refer to.

To understand the concept of "Exception to Pronoun Ambiguity" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
B
AashishGautam
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Apr 2018
Posts: 47
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Schools: ISB '24 (A)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.3
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   18 Sep 2022, 20:17
GMATNinja egmat karishma

I have a doubt regarding the modification in D.

The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Here, extended should modify the noun feet. However, to do so, it has to cross over the verb do. Is this allowed as per grammar rules?
User avatar
L
ExpertsGlobal5
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink] New post   19 Sep 2022, 00:56
Expert Reply
AashishGautam wrote:
GMATNinja egmat karishma

I have a doubt regarding the modification in D.

The tracks that dinosaurs left show that they walked with their feet directly under their bodies, as do mammals and birds, not extended out to the side in the manner of modern reptiles.

Here, extended should modify the noun feet. However, to do so, it has to cross over the verb do. Is this allowed as per grammar rules?


Hello AashishGautam,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, here "extended out to the side" does modify "feet".

"extended out to the side" and "directly under their bodies" are two parallel noun modifiers that both act upon the noun "feet", which is a part of the adverbial phrase "with their feet", which in turn modifies the verb "walked".

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Dinosaur tracks show them walking with their feet directly under their [#permalink]
19 Sep 2022, 00:56
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions