Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 06:16 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 06:16

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 176
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3249
Own Kudos [?]: 515 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Posts: 5916
Own Kudos [?]: 3083 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE:Business Development (Consumer Products)
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 176
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
Is this because the adcomm will see you waived your right and judge the recs better?
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Posts: 5916
Own Kudos [?]: 3083 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE:Business Development (Consumer Products)
Send PM
[#permalink]
homefry wrote:
Is this because the adcomm will see you waived your right and judge the recs better?


In theory. Most adcoms say they don't care. I don't believe them. I think it lends credence to the argument that your recs are honest and truthful.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 176
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
Do the recommenders see that you waived your rights?
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Posts: 5916
Own Kudos [?]: 3083 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE:Business Development (Consumer Products)
Send PM
[#permalink]
homefry wrote:
Do the recommenders see that you waived your rights?


Yes, I think so.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 176
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
rhyme wrote:
homefry wrote:
Do the recommenders see that you waived your rights?


Yes, I think so.


You're fast.
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Posts: 5916
Own Kudos [?]: 3083 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE:Business Development (Consumer Products)
Send PM
[#permalink]
homefry wrote:
rhyme wrote:
homefry wrote:
Do the recommenders see that you waived your rights?


Yes, I think so.


You're fast.


:)
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 758
Own Kudos [?]: 121 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
OH SHOOT -> I clicked on I dont waive my right to access the recs!

Is that bad? Now I am worrieD!
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1091
Own Kudos [?]: 57 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: Finance, Strategy, and Accounting
Schools:Chicago Booth
 Q47  V44
Send PM
[#permalink]
I did not waive the right for any of the 3 apps that I made in R1.
Rhyme might be right, but I do not think that it is absolutely crucial to show "good faith" on this minor issue.
Anyway, I will only have the right to see the recos if and when I am admitted. So, if the reco is bad and I am not admitted I will not have the chance to see it and will not know that I failed because of the poor reco... hence, no worries about the objectivity of the recommenders
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Posts: 5916
Own Kudos [?]: 3083 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE:Business Development (Consumer Products)
Send PM
[#permalink]
willget800 wrote:
OH SHOOT -> I clicked on I dont waive my right to access the recs!

Is that bad? Now I am worrieD!


Its not a big deal.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 727
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
Always waive... It gives the impression that the recommender is not being swayed by the pressure of your oversight. It gives the impression of an objective and impartial recommendation. Top schools want to see that you waived. Don't you guys remember all those "sealed and signed" envelopes from college apps?
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 1091
Own Kudos [?]: 57 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: Finance, Strategy, and Accounting
Schools:Chicago Booth
 Q47  V44
Send PM
[#permalink]
Mark4124 wrote:
Always waive... It gives the impression that the recommender is not being swayed by the pressure of your oversight. It gives the impression of an objective and impartial recommendation. Top schools want to see that you waived. Don't you guys remember all those "sealed and signed" envelopes from college apps?


Let me disagree. Envelope should be sealed and stamped so as to prevent tampering with the documents.
Waiving or not waiving the right to review the reco upon the admission is my right by law.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 166
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
I disagree. Don't most (or at least many) recommenders show you their recommendations before they submit them anyway if for no other reason than to ask you to verify that they didn't leave anything out?

It's difficult for me to believe that the Admissions Committee would assume that a recommendation is not objective (or less objective) just because someone chose to not waive access, or that a recommendation is objective (or more objective) solely because someone chose to waive access.

The Admissions Committee must be more sophisticated than that. After reading hundreds of recommendations each year, they've probably gotten to the point that they can tell right away whether a recommendation is objective based on the substance of the recommendation.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2014
Status:Stay focused...
Posts: 432
Own Kudos [?]: 136 [0]
Given Kudos: 753
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Ross School of Business - Class of 2017
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.2
WE:Project Management (Other)
Send PM
Re: Waive right to access recommendations? [#permalink]
I think it would be helpful to the readers if I posted my conversations with Tuck adcom on the matter.

Quote:
neo656 (applying to Tuck Round 1) commented on Tuck (view comment thread)
Hi Guys
Any clue what would be the effect on my candidacy if I do not waive off my right to to see the recommendation? Does it even matter to Tuck adcom or not?

Tuck Admissions (Member of the Tuck Admissions Committee) replied
Hi neo656 - By not waiving your right, it might raise a question that you had a hand in writing your own recommendation. The majority of applicants DO waive their right to see their LOR.

neo656 (applying to Tuck Round 1) replied
Hi Adcom Member,
Thanks for the advice! Good for me I waived off the right in second reco too.
But I am confused, because a curious person who has not seen his LOR or had a hand in writing it might be tempted to see it and hence waiver right shouldn't raise a red flag. Regardless, your advice comes in a good time. I'll post it on the other forums too.
Cheers

Tuck Admissions (Member of the Tuck Admissions Committee) replied
I know it's tempting! While we do like to give people the benefit of the doubt, it's important to be cautious. Additionally, if your recommender knows you'll see the letter, they may be less inclined to be as candid as they would be knowing it was private. Thanks for the question!

neo656 (applying to Tuck Round 1) replied
:)
Thanks for the reply!
User avatar
Veritas Prep Admissions Consultant
Joined: 19 Aug 2015
Posts: 324
Own Kudos [?]: 28 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Waive right to access recommendations? [#permalink]
Expert Reply
I would definitely waive your right to see the recommendation. Why would you not do it? Once the letter of recommendation has been submitted, there is no pulling it back. So even if you saw it and didn't like it, you couldn't do anything with the school to make it better. Sure, you could talk with your recommender, but what would that do for you? Possibly just fracture a relationship. So what value does seeing the letter after it is submitted hold for you other than to "know" what is said?
Alum
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 2282
Own Kudos [?]: 3127 [0]
Given Kudos: 893
GRE 1: Q169 V154
Send PM
Waive right to access recommendations? [#permalink]


Adcoms Erratic Behaviour #404



During MBA fairs -> Nah, we don't care if you waive your rights or not.



During that admissions meeting -> Mam, this candidate didn't waive his right. Which shredding machine do you want me to use?


Attachments

tumblr_m6gkcgRevV1qbkqbeo1_250.gif
tumblr_m6gkcgRevV1qbkqbeo1_250.gif [ 888.46 KiB | Viewed 11629 times ]

Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Nov 2016
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: United States (CO)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.1
Send PM
Re: Waive right to access recommendations? [#permalink]
wish I had seen this before I submitted my applications
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Waive right to access recommendations? [#permalink]
It is appropriate to waive. Your recommender can see you waived your right to see the recommendation and it shows you trust him, so he can say what he really thinks of you. It's also a good sign for the adcom.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Waive right to access recommendations? [#permalink]
 1   2   

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne