Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 08:46 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 08:46

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 153
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
SVP
SVP
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2209
Own Kudos [?]: 520 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Schools:Darden
 Q50  V51
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 572
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
Did anyone notice that "recruiter rating" score. HBS and Wharton are around 100 and then there's a HUGE drop-off. Not sure what to make of that.
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1041
Own Kudos [?]: 83 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
I like this list vs the other more popular ones. I think to decide on a school, we need to use the information provided by sources like BW, FT, Economist etc and create out own list based on the attributes that matter to us the most. For me 'recuiter rating' I think is the most important attribute vs things like closer to a big town/city.

The fact that a school was No 1 in BW or FT doesnt really mean anything for me.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 239
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
Interesting to see how their recruiter rating differs from WSJ's ranking (which relies solely on recruiters).
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
I got a good laugh at North Carolina State. They have like 10 full time students. I wondered how they ended up on the list. They must be counting the part timers. That's really not fair since they already have jobs.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2006
Posts: 458
Own Kudos [?]: 135 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
How does Maryland receive a recruiter ranking score of 0? Is that even possible? Yet they still are ranked 35th?

Eh, I still think the BW system is the most accurate.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
None of the full-time salaries seemed to correlate with what the schools had reported (at least for the schools I applied to and researched). Seemed to be a list they did a quick poll for and then just threw together with some salary stats from who knows where? Maybe they were including PT students as well which would drag down some schools most likely.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
To choose the 50 Best Business Schools for Getting Hired, Fortune and its partner QS analyze information from QS's TopMBA Scorecard, which includes data on 111 top accredited U.S. business schools. TopMBA Scorecard is an online tool designed to help students search MBA programs to find the best one for them. For this list, schools are ranked based equally on their reputation with recruiters and on their strength of career placement, based on a search by a student looking to study in a full-time MBA program in the United States.

They aren't including part-time students.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 82
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
List looked pretty generic until I saw Georgetown at #16.. well done Hoyas!
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jul 2006
Posts: 365
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: 50 Best Business schools for getting hired [#permalink]
jinkazama wrote:
I just found this on the CNN/Fortune website. Not sure how recent it is.



2007
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 94
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Bay Area
Send PM
[#permalink]
I am also shocked that UNC is left out. Mistake?
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 1960
Own Kudos [?]: 332 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
pelihu wrote:
Did anyone notice that Columbia's average bonus was $61k+, compared with $20-30k for most other top schools? The joys of working in NY I guess.


50k for Tuck
User avatar
CEO
CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3249
Own Kudos [?]: 515 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
It is interesting this falls in line with the clusters:
One through seven are the ultra elites and the elites are represent 9 of the next 10 schools.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 48
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
cbreeze wrote:
I am also shocked that UNC is left out. Mistake?

I just noticed this footnote

"Note: Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, was incorrectly listed in the 2006 QS recruiter survey and thus does not appear in this year's rankings. The school will be included in next year's survey. We regret the error."
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 01 Nov 2006
Posts: 1854
Own Kudos [?]: 233 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Social Enterprise
Schools:The Duke MBA, Class of 2009
Send PM
[#permalink]
Hjort wrote:
It is interesting this falls in line with the clusters:
One through seven are the ultra elites and the elites are represent 9 of the next 10 schools.


No, Hjort. Not interesting, but expected. For me, your clusters have been the easiest way to guage overall rankings.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
cbreeze wrote:
I am also shocked that UNC is left out. Mistake?


It was a mistake. CNN has since recognized the errors in survey/rankings and has removed the article from it's site. They said the two schools most larely influenced by the errors were UNC and Boston U. They had a independent company conduct and produce the rankings. Oh well, it was interesting while it was around.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 727
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
Yes... UNC sent out an email today. Both UNC and BU were omitted from the list. The salaries looked fishy too and inconsistent with other reports. I am not suprized it was flawed.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
Someone was probrably fired for that mistake. CNN probrably paid a decent amount of money to publish junk data.
GMAT Club Bot
[#permalink]
 1   2   

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne