Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 12:52 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 12:52

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Levelx   Idioms/Diction/Redundancyx                     
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 74
Own Kudos [?]: 1635 [64]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 402
Own Kudos [?]: 1748 [25]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Status:Far, far away!
Posts: 859
Own Kudos [?]: 4890 [7]
Given Kudos: 219
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Nov 2008
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [6]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
4
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
lgon wrote:
255. Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.
(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at
Why A is wrong?



2 clues

1. "seemingly" must qualify an adj Eliminate A, ¨B and C
2. "Targeted at" is idiomatic
3. Each is required to illustrate the importance of each and every single antibody

Choose E
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 240
Own Kudos [?]: 308 [1]
Given Kudos: 64
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GMAT Date: 12-27-2011
WE:Law (Law)
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies. each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign
substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at SEEMINGLY SHOULD APPLY TO DESCRIBE THE ADVERB. A, B, C ARE GONE
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to-TARGETED AT IS THE CORRECT IDIOM
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 124
Own Kudos [?]: 294 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I have chosen E for the answer:

A. Seemingly is the correct word here because we are trying to use a word to modify unlimited. Since an adjective cannot modify another adjective, an adverb must be used.

B. Seemingly is the correct word to be used, not seeming. "Targeted specifically at" is the correct form.

C. Seemingly is the correct word to be used, not seeming. The word "all" does not make sense in this case because it does not agree with the singular "an invading microbe or foreign substance."

D. The word "all" does not make sense in this case because it doesn't agree with "an invading microbe or foreign substance." Also, "targeted specifically to" is the incorrect form.

E. Seemingly is used correctly here and "each targeted specifically at" makes sense.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Status:Far, far away!
Posts: 859
Own Kudos [?]: 4890 [2]
Given Kudos: 219
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
skamal7 wrote:
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.
(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at

I always get wrong when there is a construction like [adverb/adjective] [adverb/adjective] [noun]

Please some one help me to identify correctly in these type of constructions.
As per the meaning of sentence how the body can constantly change its genes to a antibodies . So it should be a adjective to modify the antibodies .Asusual i ended up wrongly with these constructions


This is form the OG's solution:
"Choices A, B, and C incorrectly use the adjective form seeming to modify the participial adjective unlimited. "
This means that "seeming (adj)unlimited (adj)number of antibodies" two adjectives cannot modify each other.
With this you are left with D and E only. I personally cannot find any difference between "targeted specifically" and "specifically targeted".
D is wrong because uses a wrong idiom "targeted TO"

Adjectives modify nouns.
Adverbs modify verbs, a clause, an adjective or an another adverb.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2017
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
Hello Guys,

Shall somebody explain me why ''target at'' and not ''target to''?

Does not ''Each'' or ''All of them''need an explicit subject?, Would it be better ''That''?

Regards,


Kind regards,

Manuel
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 689
Own Kudos [?]: 415 [0]
Given Kudos: 778
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
Can I just say that when we are using verb related to aim, mark, fix, point, target etc. it is idiomatically correct to use "at"?
Look, when we are hitting at particular point or raising finger at specific person, we use "at". "At" normally talks about something specific.
What are your views over this?

beckee529 wrote:
pi10t wrote:
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies. each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign
substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at


E is correct. adjectives only modify nouns while adverbs can modify verbs, phrases, and other adverbs.

in this case, seemingly (an adverb) is modifying "unlimited number of antibodies"

"seeming" is an adjective and therefore wrong so we can eliminate A, B, and C. between D and E, "targeted.. at" is preferred over "targeted.. to"
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7626 [0]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
The trick is to quickly realize that seeming is an adjective and not an adverb.
What we need in the right answer/option is an adverb that modifies unlimited number of antibodies.

As soon as you see seemingly in the options you can disregard that others.

Eliminate Options A, B, and C.

Now the choice is between Options D and E.

You might be tricked into choosing Option D if you are in a hurry and don't read the option completely. Because, at the end the preposition used is to, which is unidiomatic when used with targeted. We can eliminate D

The last Option E has both seemingly and the correct idiom.

Option E is the best option.

Hope this helps!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Sep 2020
Posts: 65
Own Kudos [?]: 45 [0]
Given Kudos: 45
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
egmat, VeritasKarishma : can you please provide a proper explaination why we have to choose seemeingly . as per my understanding unlimited number of antibodies , is it acting as prepositional noun ?
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64899 [2]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
PrashantK0099 wrote:
egmat, VeritasKarishma : can you please provide a proper explaination why we have to choose seemeingly . as per my understanding unlimited number of antibodies , is it acting as prepositional noun ?


'unlimited' is a modifier for number and 'seemingly' modifies 'unlimited'. Only adverbs can modify other modifiers so you need to use 'seemingly', an adverb.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Oct 2020
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
KarishmaB - Can you pls review my 2nd reason listed below and confirm if it's the right one.

Option D is wrong for 2 reasons -

1. Idiom error - Targeted at is needed
2. All of them changes the meaning. All of the antibodies target at an invading microbe vs each of the antibodies specifically target at an invading microbe.
For eg - let us say an microbe enters the body so one specific antibody will target at the microbe instead of all the antibodies, and that's why option D is wrong as we want to convey that only specific antibody will function based on invading microbe.

Thanks,
Anshul P
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64899 [1]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
PanpaliaAnshul wrote:
KarishmaB - Can you pls review my 2nd reason listed below and confirm if it's the right one.

Option D is wrong for 2 reasons -

1. Idiom error - Targeted at is needed
2. All of them changes the meaning. All of the antibodies target at an invading microbe vs each of the antibodies specifically target at an invading microbe.
For eg - let us say an microbe enters the body so one specific antibody will target at the microbe instead of all the antibodies, and that's why option D is wrong as we want to convey that only specific antibody will function based on invading microbe.

Thanks,
Anshul P


Yes, this is correct Anshul. A specific type of antibody will target one specific microbe. All will not target one specific microbe.
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
Expert Reply
PanpaliaAnshul wrote:
KarishmaB - Can you pls review my 2nd reason listed below and confirm if it's the right one.

Option D is wrong for 2 reasons -

1. Idiom error - Targeted at is needed
2. All of them changes the meaning. All of the antibodies target at an invading microbe vs each of the antibodies specifically target at an invading microbe.
For eg - let us say an microbe enters the body so one specific antibody will target at the microbe instead of all the antibodies, and that's why option D is wrong as we want to convey that only specific antibody will function based on invading microbe.

Thanks,
Anshul P


Hello PanpaliaAnshul,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, your reasoning is indeed correct on both points.

Kudos.

All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2023
Status:Ongoing
Posts: 73
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GPA: 3.99
WE:Operations (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
Please explain all vs each and targeted at vs to. Above explanation didn't help.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6919 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne