NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 14:09 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 14:09
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

What Makes the Quant on the Actual GMAT "Harder"?

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics  Add a Tag
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
kdog3490
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
What Makes the Quant on the Actual GMAT "Harder"? [#permalink] New post   02 Apr 2003, 22:29
Hi everyone,

As this is my first post on this forum, I'd first like to commend BB and the gang for setting up a such a helpful and informative site (not to mention great-looking).

My question is to all those who have taken the GMAT - what is it about the quant. section that makes it more 'difficult'? On many posts on this and several other GMAT boards, I've seen the same post-mortem comment over and over: math on the actual GMAT is somewhat tougher than the math presented in OG/PowerPrep, Kaplan, PR, etc.

I'm not looking for actual questions or anything like that, but I'd just like to get a feel for how it differs from the guides we're all studying from. Is it the wording or complexity (e.g. multi-stage problems)? The time it takes to solve them? Greater focus on probability/perms./combs.? Or just outright weird questions? I've done fairly well on quant on the practice tests so far (49Q and 50Q on PP#1 and PP#2) but I'm wondering if I'm overestimating my ability... please share your thoughts. Thanks.
avatar
stolyar
VP
VP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1012
Own Kudos [?]: 1629 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink] New post   02 Apr 2003, 23:12
IMHO:

1. The actual test is a strong stress -- we all are nervous (many books advise to relax, but they don't advise how to do so. I know people who took the test just for training; nevertheless, their hands were shaking after the ordeal).
2. The GMAT likes to give several unusual problems abruptly.
3. I myself had a couple of problems that have no right answers among options. They confused and disbalanced me much.

Your math scores seem OK. Try Kaplan 2003.
User avatar
L
bb
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37301
Own Kudos [?]: 72871 [0]
Given Kudos: 18857
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests Forum Quiz Mode
[#permalink] New post   03 Apr 2003, 00:00
Expert Reply
stolyar wrote:
IMHO:

1. The actual test is a strong stress -- we all are nervous (many books advise to relax, but they don't advise how to do so. I know people who took the test just for training; nevertheless, their hands were shaking after the ordeal).
2. The GMAT likes to give several unusual problems abruptly.
3. I myself had a couple of problems that have no right answers among options. They confused and disbalanced me much.

Your math scores seem OK. Try Kaplan 2003.



I pretty much agree :wink:

but I thought Kaplan was harder overall...

Stress factor for sure is mind mumbing - esp the panic you get when after one read you can't get the hold of the solution approach...



-=-=
avatar
Vasga
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink] New post   09 Apr 2003, 03:30
Actual GMAT Math takes more calculations, besides they like to mix different types of problems. I myself got a problem which was a mix of coordinate geometry, geometry, probability, and also several problems, which required the knowledge of some tricks in order to solve them quickly without wasting time.
User avatar
L
bb
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37301
Own Kudos [?]: 72871 [0]
Given Kudos: 18857
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests Forum Quiz Mode
[#permalink] New post   09 Apr 2003, 18:07
Expert Reply
Vasga wrote:
Actual GMAT Math takes more calculations, besides they like to mix different types of problems. I myself got a problem which was a mix of coordinate geometry, geometry, probability, and also several problems, which required the knowledge of some tricks in order to solve them quickly without wasting time.




Hm... it seems I got away quite easily..

I had only one probability problem and the rest were pretty much "normal"....

I think time limit and just how much depends on the score is what makes it difficult and stressful.
avatar
Vasga
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink] New post   10 Apr 2003, 05:51
I got two probability problems, two statistics and about 3 problems which were quite unusual and difficult.
User avatar
L
bb
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37301
Own Kudos [?]: 72871 [0]
Given Kudos: 18857
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests Forum Quiz Mode
[#permalink] New post   10 Apr 2003, 08:52
Expert Reply
Vasga wrote:
I got two probability problems, two statistics and about 3 problems which were quite unusual and difficult.



:horror

It does look like GMAT is mutating.

I think they are trying to prevent people from being able to run though all the possible kinds of problems and this way "solve problems in advance"

I heard some rummor about a GMAT prep course in China - New Oriental School that they have people who go to the test center every month and memorize the test questions. (Sounds like a fun job to me). This way they can then charge $4,000 for a course.

I think this is what ETS wants to prevent - people like this and as the result everybody has to pay...
avatar
Coasterby
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Apr 2003
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Send PM
Agreed [#permalink] New post   30 Apr 2003, 14:56
I fully agree with BB on this one. There's no shred of doubt in my mind that GMAT math is getting progressively more difficult over time. I ran through both POWERPREP simulations and Kaplan's CATs and found the actual GMAT quant. more difficult. In hindsight, I think I might have gotten bogged down on some experimental quants. As a result, I was short of time near the end. Keep in mind that they might be taking the overall 'increased' difficutly of the quant section into account. I received 690 and got only 64th percentile on the quant. Sure, I did very well on verbal, but I'm still suprised. I'd love to know how ETS' score engine works. For example, does a 45 quant and a 45 verbal always mean a certain overall score (e.g. 700), or are the individual section scaled scores meaningless, and only the overall is relevant. I think ETS should provide more info regarding score calculation.

Coasterby
avatar
moleadus
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2003
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink] New post   05 May 2003, 17:47
Hey guys,

I also agree, I took the test today and noticed that I had 2 graphs on the quant section. As far as I knew, they didn't have graphs in the past. Regardless, I also felt like the quant on the exam was much harder than the test prep material. I used Kaplan's math workbook and GMAT 800, and the quant was still very difficult for me. I ended up with a 600 overall, 48% quant and 82% verbal. It's good enough for me to get into my progam, so I'm pleased. And it only took me 3 times taking it. :)

moleadus
VTay25
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos:
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
WE:Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
BullShit [#permalink] New post   04 Jun 2003, 07:40
I wrote ETS about it and the difficulty to them is still the same, unless you can show proof, don't say it is, your scaring people who haven't taken it.

If you can show to that to them, write them at gmat@ets.org
VTay25
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos:
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
WE:Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Each GMAT is equal [#permalink] New post   04 Jun 2003, 07:44
You want yours to be more difficult, your score is adjusted higher.
User avatar
L
bb
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37301
Own Kudos [?]: 72871 [0]
Given Kudos: 18857
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests Forum Quiz Mode
[#permalink] New post   05 Jun 2003, 13:04
Expert Reply
One thing to note is the level of math ETS says it will test.

The difficulty does not depend on whether problem appeared before or not. E.g. if a graph question comes up and it has not ever been on the GMAT before - it does not mean that it is more difficult - it is just different/new. It may be but just as well may not. If you prepare using tests - then for sure it is more difficult, but if you prepare using textbooks and you review the level you need to, I don't think the "new" questions will be as difficult.

I am not sure about the readibility of the above :wink:
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
[#permalink]
05 Jun 2003, 13:04
Moderator:
bb
Founder
37301 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions