Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 05:18 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 05:18

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 477
Own Kudos [?]: 299 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 477
Own Kudos [?]: 299 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 231
Own Kudos [?]: 622 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 231
Own Kudos [?]: 622 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SET theory ... BIG CONFUSION [#permalink]
For set theory questions ... i'd suggets to always go by Venn diagrams...

these formula can be confusing ... which one to apply where ....
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 300
Own Kudos [?]: 581 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: MC, PE, VC
 Q50  V37
Send PM
Re: SET theory ... BIG CONFUSION [#permalink]
durgesh79 wrote:
For set theory questions ... i'd suggets to always go by Venn diagrams...

these formula can be confusing ... which one to apply where ....


Completely agree with you on this.

Most of the times venn diagram is the fastest approach. It gives a clear picture that formulae.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 477
Own Kudos [?]: 299 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: SET theory ... BIG CONFUSION [#permalink]
alpha_plus_gamma wrote:
durgesh79 wrote:
For set theory questions ... i'd suggets to always go by Venn diagrams...

these formula can be confusing ... which one to apply where ....


Completely agree with you on this.

Most of the times venn diagram is the fastest approach. It gives a clear picture that formulae.


Sure ... I always do it with venn diagrams but htis time I got confused with deriving formulae for this one.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 477
Own Kudos [?]: 299 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: SET theory ... BIG CONFUSION [#permalink]
durgesh79 wrote:
rao_1857 wrote:
Another problem that I have is in uderstanding AuBuC

I always get this .. please let me know where I am wrong?

P(AuBuC)=P(A)+P(B)+P(C) - P(AnB) - P(AnC) + P(AnBnC) - P(BnC) + P(AnBnC)

since when I first subtracted P(AnB) that was also including P(AnBnC). So next time when I am substracting P(AnC) and P(AnB), I am adding P(AnBnC) to avoind any duplicaiton


let me try.... AuBuC should include everying that is in A, B and C and common areas should be counted only once...

AnB is a part of A
AnB is a part of B

so when we write A+B+C we are actully counting AnB twice .... so we have to substratc AnB once to get the final answer ... similar logic for AnC and BnC ....

AnBnC is a part of A, B, C, AnB, AnC and BnC....
so when we add A+B+C and substract - AnB-AnC-BnC we are adding AnBnC 3times and substraticg it 3 times .... so we have to add in once to get the final answer....

HTH


Make sense so far. Hope I dont go too deep into this. My problem is that I go very deep and eventually ned up in confusing myself. So far your explanation makes perfect sense.

Thanks

PS: +1
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 70
Own Kudos [?]: 37 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
Re: SET theory ... BIG CONFUSION [#permalink]
Guys, great work...have been following this for a long time...so whats with the original question?


1. For 3 sets A, B, and C: P(AuBuC) = P(A) + P(B) + P(C) – P(AnB) – P(AnC) – P(BnC) + P(AnBnC)

6. No of persons in atleast one set:
P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(AnB) - P(AnC) - P(BnC) + 2 P(AnBnC)



"Can somebody please explain what is the difference between 1 and 6?"

I dont think 6 makes sense...Any takers??



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: SET theory ... BIG CONFUSION [#permalink]
Moderator:
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne