Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 13:20 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 13:20

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Dec 2007
Posts: 1687
Own Kudos [?]: 222 [0]
Given Kudos: 31
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy, MC
Schools:Kellogg '11
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Posts: 516
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [0]
Given Kudos: 28
Concentration: General Management
Schools:Harvard '11
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 329
Own Kudos [?]: 136 [0]
Given Kudos: 92
Concentration: General Management
WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Posts: 274
Own Kudos [?]: 124 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: The Most Powerless Powerful Man on Wall Street - article [#permalink]
Interesting article... thanks for bringing it up. Wondering why City paid so much money for his company which was underperforming
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Status:Burning mid-night oil....daily
Posts: 2396
Own Kudos [?]: 779 [0]
Given Kudos: 548
Schools:Yale SOM 2011 Alum, Kellogg, Booth, Tuck
 Q44  V50
WE 1: IB - Restructuring & Distressed M&A
Send PM
Re: The Most Powerless Powerful Man on Wall Street - article [#permalink]
spiridon wrote:
Interesting article... thanks for bringing it up. Wondering why City paid so much money for his company which was underperforming


A company buys back shares for following reasons:

1) The buyback announcement, its terms, and the way it is implemented all convey signals about the company's prospects and plans. One example, when a company buys back shares of its own, it is signaling confidence in their future performance to the investors.

2) If financed by a debt issue, buybacks can significantly change a company's capital structure, increasing its reliance on debt and decreasing its reliance on equity.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Posts: 274
Own Kudos [?]: 124 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: The Most Powerless Powerful Man on Wall Street - article [#permalink]
nink wrote:
spiridon wrote:
Interesting article... thanks for bringing it up. Wondering why City paid so much money for his company which was underperforming


A company buys back shares for following reasons:

1) The buyback announcement, its terms, and the way it is implemented all convey signals about the company's prospects and plans. One example, when a company buys back shares of its own, it is signaling confidence in their future performance to the investors.

2) If financed by a debt issue, buybacks can significantly change a company's capital structure, increasing its reliance on debt and decreasing its reliance on equity.


What are you talking about? They (city) bought Pandits private hedge fund thru acquisition in order to bring him to the company according to the author. Who mentioned back buying shares
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Status:Burning mid-night oil....daily
Posts: 2396
Own Kudos [?]: 779 [0]
Given Kudos: 548
Schools:Yale SOM 2011 Alum, Kellogg, Booth, Tuck
 Q44  V50
WE 1: IB - Restructuring & Distressed M&A
Send PM
Re: The Most Powerless Powerful Man on Wall Street - article [#permalink]
spiridon wrote:
What are you talking about? They (city) bought Pandits private hedge fund thru acquisition in order to bring him to the company according to the author. Who mentioned back buying shares


:-D
Oh, that's what you are talking about.

Well, Pandit used to run Morgan Stanley investment bank division before Purcell took power and he overcame similar situation in turning around a business.

Since Citi's executive talent pool was thin compared to its peers, I guess the only way they can recruit a talent like Pandit was to buy his entire hedge fund and absorb into Citi.

Before his Citi gig, Pandit was widely viewed as a star on Wall St, with specialization in risk management.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Posts: 274
Own Kudos [?]: 124 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: The Most Powerless Powerful Man on Wall Street - article [#permalink]
nink wrote:
Since Citi's executive talent pool was thin compared to its peers, I guess the only way they can recruit a talent like Pandit was to buy his entire hedge fund and absorb into Citi.

Before his Citi gig, Pandit was widely viewed as a star on Wall St, with specialization in risk management.


Thats the point, according to the author, Pandit was never a risk taker, he rather offered to sell out services rather then to actually invest etc. Also, he couldnt manage to run his own fund so I dont get why someone would hire this guy to the executive position? I would bring him on to do some heavy calculations and to deliver information on investment-risk ratios but not have him to actually run a company! And to pay him all that money just to bring him on!!! that doesnt sound as a good idea if all the information presented in the text is close to what really happened there.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Status:Burning mid-night oil....daily
Posts: 2396
Own Kudos [?]: 779 [0]
Given Kudos: 548
Schools:Yale SOM 2011 Alum, Kellogg, Booth, Tuck
 Q44  V50
WE 1: IB - Restructuring & Distressed M&A
Send PM
Re: The Most Powerless Powerful Man on Wall Street - article [#permalink]
spiridon wrote:
I would bring him on to do some heavy calculations and to deliver information on investment-risk ratios but not have him to actually run a company! And to pay him all that money just to bring him on!!! that doesnt sound as a good idea if all the information presented in the text is close to what really happened there.


Pandit wanted to run Morgan Stanley after Purcell was pushed out. He was willing to come back ONLY if he gets to run the show. Instead, MS went with J Mack.

I don't think Citi could have hired Pandit at the time without a promise that Pandit will succeed Prince sooner or later.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Posts: 516
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [0]
Given Kudos: 28
Concentration: General Management
Schools:Harvard '11
Send PM
Re: The Most Powerless Powerful Man on Wall Street - article [#permalink]
Timely article post isa...Citi shares fell below $1 today:

https://money.cnn.com/2009/03/05/news/co ... 2009030511
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The Most Powerless Powerful Man on Wall Street - article [#permalink]

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne