Hi Tommy,
sorry for not checking into that question. Frankly, I'm surprised at GMAC's explanation.
However, while it is strongly suggestive, I don't think it quite establishes that a choice will be wrong ONLY because it does not strengthen as much as another choice.
If we look at choice E of the question you cite, we see right away that it is outside the scope. The scope of the argument was "
bowerbirds' building styles" while choice E discusses "
song dialects".
Is a song dialect the same thing as a building style?...obviously not.
Choice E supports the more general idea that
some things are learned rather than genetically transmitted. But it does not "strengthen the conclusion drawn by researchers" which is that "
bowerbirds' building styles are a culturally acquired, rather than a genetically transmitted, trait."
Thus, despite GMAC's (surprising) explanation, there is a much better reason justifying chioce E's incorrectness:
it does not relate to the researchers' conclusion, and thus cannot be something that strengthens the researchers' conclusion. It, like the other three choices, simply fails to satisfy the conditions of the question.
In the
OG question, while the GMAC's explanation is mystifying, again, the
design of the question does not establish the inference that:
a choice will be wrong ONLY because it does not strengthen as much as another choice.
I will be convinced if I ever see an officially released question in which the ONLY reason to eliminate a choice is because it does not strengthen as much as another choice (still haven't).
While you may consider my position stubborn, I invite you to respond to or contemplate my observation that choice E of question 21 of OG12 is clearly outside the scope. Again, in every official question I've seen one and only one choice satisfies the conditions of the question. This question does NOT prove otherwise (although GMAC's explanation is baffling).
The reason I am defending this position strongly is that I think it is something very important for the test-taker to understand and trust: there is only one correct answer!
EDIT: In retrospect, GMAC's explanation isn't all that surprising. Their explanation is certainly one way of looking at it. But, as I wrote above, considering scope is another way of eliminating E. Again, I don't think GMAC's explanation of that question supports the more general (and more ambitious) idea that a choice will be wrong ONLY because it doesn't strengthen as much as another choice.