sailtheworld wrote:
Tier 1:
LSE, LBS, Princeton, MIT
Tier 2:
HEC Paris, Bocconi, St. Gallen, SSE, WUSTL
Tier 3:
Vanderbilt, Warwick, Boston College, Duke, UVA, Rotterdam, Florida
[though Duke and UVA would only be helpful for getting into I-banking or consulting, not S&T]
Tier 4:
Illinois, Tulane, Villanova, Claremont McKenna
I put Florida Tier 3 because this past year looks like they placed very well, but previously not so well. Not sure about Claremont to be honest, there's a few good placements here and there, but not really overall; usually a couple get to bulge brackets for IBD or S&T. IMO programs should be ranked on if they're able to place into bulge brackets or elite boutique banks in NY, SF, Chicago, LA (UBS/CS) or big 3 consulting. Also, if they place into similar quality banks in foreign countries (especially London, HK, Singapore). These are generally the most competitive recruitments.
Edit: Placed Claremont in tier 4 after reviewing their latest profile
Tier 1 looks about right, but I think it could be expanded for more Euro schools.
Tier 2 is fine for someone looking to work in Europe. WUSTL won't help you overseas and the European schools listed wont help you if you want to work in the states.
Tier 3 Looks about fine for a US focused person, but Warwick isn't going to do anything for you in the US.
Tier 4 could be expanded as well and I would disagree with even having a tier 4 since there really are only 3 tiers.
Tier 1 = Ivy schools or top schools --- Princeton & MIT
Tier 2 = Schools with strong brands and strong alumni. These programs are also mostly regional players.
Villanova, Vanderbilt, UIUC, Claremont, UVA, Duke, Florida, Purdue, WUSTL, OSU etc.
Tier 3 = School that are very regional or city specific. UT Dallas will be great for working in Dallas. Oklahoma would do well in that state, etc. These programs will have limited reach outside of their core area.
The reason why many rankings fail is the niche nature of an MSF. For example, I just looked at Tulanes placements. Tulane is very strong in the south and for energy. Villanova, a school I known very well, places entirely in Philadelphia and NYC. So if you want to work in Texas and in energy, rankings would be worthless, you should always pick Tulane.
Claremont has a great program with impressive placements. They tend to take a lot of people from Pomona (great school) and look for high GMAT scores. Their placements also tended to be mostly west coast.
If you want to work in Cali, Claremont is your choice, regardless of rankings.
Until the degree gets to be more known and accepted, ranking will only suffice in making the individual feel better about their respective choice. The MSF degree is not strong enough to transcend geographic restrictions.
A Wharton MBA can work anywhere. Outside of Princeton and MIT, no MSF program has that respect or brand strength to truly say that themselves.