If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul : Sentence Correction (EA only)

rohitgoel15

Manager

Joined: 07 Nov 2009

Posts: 187

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

21 Sep 2010, 22:20

5

Kudos

59

Bookmarks

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

25% (01:40) correct

75% (01:39) wrong

based on 953 sessions

Hide Show timer Statistics

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment.

A. If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but

B. If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather

C. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather

D. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather

E. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, nor heat, but

Show Answer

Official Answer

Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/Login.

request expert reply

geturdream

Manager

Joined: 22 Aug 2008

Posts: 88

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

22 Sep 2010, 23:04

2

Kudos

6

Bookmarks

Good question....
the choice is between would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather and would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather

for this we need to take a look at what is after rather...is it a verb or a noun. If noun then the first one wins
if a verb then the second one wins.

intense electromagnetic pulse this is noun.
so to make things || we need a noun in the earlier clause.
So the sentence becomes ... would generate no blast ..... but ...(generate) intense electromagnetic .....

C wins

L

daagh

GMAT Club Legend

Joined: 19 Feb 2007

Status: enjoying

Posts: 5265

Location: India

WE:Education (Education)

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

06 Feb 2016, 03:36

1

Kudos

4

Bookmarks

Expert Reply

Quote:

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment.

a. If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but -----not and nor make the clause a double negative. It should be ‘neither …nor’ or ‘not … or’

b. If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather – though accepted sometimes as good enough when extant alone, ‘not … but rather’ is still inferior to ‘not…. but’ because it is wordier. When both the forms of the idiom are available simple ‘not… but’ makes a better choice.

c. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather ---- the same reasoning as in B. While the left of the conjunction but has no article, the right has an article in the form of an intense electromagnetic. Though not very significant, still it is a pin - prick.

d. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather --- not generate … but rather an intense ‘misses the correlative parallelism

e. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, nor heat, but ------ the same problem as in D.

Not happy with any of the choices.
_________________

Thank you Daagh for your time on GMAT Club and all your contributions! Thank you for everything you did!
Your work will remain a great tribute to you here on GMAT Club!
-bb

Signature Read More

shrouded1

Retired Moderator

Joined: 02 Sep 2010

Posts: 615

Location: London

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

21 Sep 2010, 22:46

1

Kudos

no blast, shock, or heat
v/s
a blast, shock, or heat

The second list doesnt seem parallel.
_________________

Math write-ups
1) Algebra-101 2) Sequences 3) Set combinatorics 4) 3-D geometry

My GMAT story

Signature Read More

aman1213

Intern

Joined: 16 Sep 2010

Posts: 20

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

22 Sep 2010, 00:36

2

Kudos

i went with option E
as i think But and rahter are redundant.
we should use 1 of them.
kindly give the official explaination and answer.

elevinty

Manager

Joined: 24 Jan 2010

Status:Mesmerized

Posts: 102

Location: UAE, Dubai

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

22 Sep 2010, 04:27

it cant be D, there is no parallelism, after "but" is a noun, so we need a noun after ""NOT'" instead we have a verb "GENERATED"
I was down between A or C, I know C is the OA but why A is wrong?

shrouded1

Retired Moderator

Joined: 02 Sep 2010

Posts: 615

Location: London

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

22 Sep 2010, 05:12

1

Bookmarks

elevinty wrote:

it cant be D, there is no parallelism, after "but" is a noun, so we need a noun after ""NOT'" instead we have a verb "GENERATED"
I was down between A or C, I know C is the OA but why A is wrong?

not X,Y, nor Z ... doesnt sound right
_________________

Math write-ups
1) Algebra-101 2) Sequences 3) Set combinatorics 4) 3-D geometry

My GMAT story

Signature Read More

onedayill

Manager

Joined: 25 Feb 2010

Posts: 208

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

22 Sep 2010, 06:03

1

Kudos

this one's a bit tricky ....

C and D look very similar, don't they?
In C, we're using "no" and a noun;
In D, we're using "not" and a verb.

"not... but..." is a conjunction and therefore requires parallel structure. So in D, after "not" we have "generate," a verb, and after "but" we have "pulse," a noun.
where as we need a verb.

So we can rule out D.
_________________

GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl) -- Be Serious

Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...

Signature Read More

S

manhasnoname

Manager

Joined: 21 Apr 2016

Posts: 138

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

21 Aug 2016, 18:57

Can someone answer why D & E aren't parallel? Can't the article "a" be distributed to all items in a list? To maintain parallelism in the "either...or..." stem article should be present.

G

sayantanc2k

CR Moderator

Joined: 14 Dec 2013

Posts: 2415

Location: Germany

Schools:

GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47

WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

22 Aug 2016, 12:32

1

Kudos

Expert Reply

manhasnoname wrote:

Can someone answer why D & E aren't parallel? Can't the article "a" be distributed to all items in a list? To maintain parallelism in the "either...or..." stem article should be present.

Distribution of article is not the issue in D - in authentic sources, such distribution has been used.

The problem of parallelism in D and E lies elsewhere. Because of use of "not", the idiom "not X but Y" comes into effect, and thus there arises a violation of parallelism.
not + verb (generate) requires but (rather) + verb to maintain parallelism.

G

techiesam

Manager

Joined: 01 Jun 2015

Posts: 159

Location: India

Concentration: Strategy, International Business

GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

21 Aug 2017, 11:37

I have a question regarding the use of but rather. rather is an adverb and here it seems to modify the noun phrase.So my question is"Don't we just need a but instead of but rather?"

B

NicoleJaneway

Intern

Joined: 18 Nov 2016

Posts: 34

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

23 Aug 2017, 18:11

rohitgoel15 wrote:

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment.

c. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather

Could someone explain this comma to me? It's such a little thing, but I'm not sure what it's doing there since "an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment" definitely isn't an independent clause.

I have the same confusion about a similar ellipsis question:

Quote:

Until 2010, a state tax regulation known as the "80-20 rule required that condominium associations receive at least 80 percent of their gross income from their tenant-shareholders, and no more than 20 percent from other sources, like ground-floor rent for restaurants.

Sorry for being a pest and posting twice, but all the study advice says so stay persistent and follow every source of confusion until you fully understand the material. How I feel about commas right now:

How I'll feel once I've got this sorted:

G

sayantanc2k

CR Moderator

Joined: 14 Dec 2013

Posts: 2415

Location: Germany

Schools:

GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47

WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

29 Aug 2017, 06:33

Expert Reply

NicoleJaneway wrote:

rohitgoel15 wrote:

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment.

c. A nuclear weapon detonated above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather

Could someone explain this comma to me? It's such a little thing, but I'm not sure what it's doing there since "an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric lines and electronic equipment" definitely isn't an independent clause.

I have the same confusion about a similar ellipsis question:

Quote:

Until 2010, a state tax regulation known as the "80-20 rule required that condominium associations receive at least 80 percent of their gross income from their tenant-shareholders, and no more than 20 percent from other sources, like ground-floor rent for restaurants.

Sorry for being a pest and posting twice, but all the study advice says so stay persistent and follow every source of confusion until you fully understand the material. How I feel about commas right now:

How I'll feel once I've got this sorted:

Consider the following uses:

1 a. Use of "but" to join two clauses:
I can read, but I cannot write. ( comma must be included.)

1 b. Use of "but" to join two items that are not clauses (e.g. two verbs).
I can read but cannot write. ( comma must be eliminated.)

2. Use of "but" as a part of idiom "not X, BUT Y".
What I saw was not a child, but a man. ( comma is required.)

The usage of "comma" in option C is similar to the usage 2 above (idiom).

G

sayantanc2k

CR Moderator

Joined: 14 Dec 2013

Posts: 2415

Location: Germany

Schools:

GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47

WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

29 Aug 2017, 06:36

Expert Reply

techiesam wrote:

I have a question regarding the use of but rather. rather is an adverb and here it seems to modify the noun phrase.So my question is"Don't we just need a but instead of but rather?"

"But" and "but rather" would both be gramatically correct. "But rather" is more emphatic than just "but".

B

PavaniRaghunath

Intern

Joined: 09 Feb 2016

Posts: 15

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

17 Apr 2019, 22:19

I am also confused with C. Isn't C changing the meaning of the original sentence. The original sentence is using "if", while C removes that conditional. Is this ok?

P

DmitryFarber

Manhattan Prep Instructor

Joined: 22 Mar 2011

Posts: 2637

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

21 Apr 2019, 00:04

1

Kudos

Expert Reply

There is no such thing as the original. We simply have five choices, with one plugged in for ease of reading. Answer choice A has no more claim to correctness than any other choice. Besides, answer choice C is still conditional. It says that this "would" happen, which is a conditional form. It isn't saying that such a detonation will actually occur, but simply describing what would happen if one *were* to occur.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile

Signature Read More

B

Debarshee

Intern

Joined: 15 Jun 2021

Posts: 2

Location: India

GMAT 1: 530 Q43 V20 Verified score

WE:Sales (Commercial Banking)

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

17 May 2022, 09:57

Can you please help with the OE for the question?

VerbalBot

Non-Human User

Joined: 01 Oct 2013

Posts: 17199

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

25 Oct 2023, 09:22

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Signature Read More

gmatclubot

Re: If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul [#permalink]

25 Oct 2023, 09:22

GMAT Sentence Correction (EA only) Questions

If a nuclear weapon were to be detonated above the atmosphere, it woul

GMAT Question Banks