Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 16:14 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 16:14

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 167
Own Kudos [?]: 989 [108]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: California
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 284
Own Kudos [?]: 492 [28]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64900 [27]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2006
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
Of all the attendees at a dinner party, 40% were women. If each attendee arrived at the party either alone or with another attendee of the opposite sex, what percentage of the total number of attendees arrived at the party alone?

(1) 50% of the male attendees arrived with a woman.

(2) 25% of the attendees arriving alone were women.


40%T Women so 60%T Men

1) => 30%T men came with 30%T women => 10%T women and 30%T men came alone = 40%

2) 25% of attendeed who arrived alone were women => 75% of them were men. So i X arrived alone
0.25X Women
0.75X Men

We need to find X/T, but this info is not sufficient.

IMO A
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 696
Own Kudos [?]: 107 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
 Q49  V45
Send PM
[#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
I get D.

A - same as above.

B:

Let X be the total number of people

0.4X --> number of women

0.25* 0.4X = 0.1 X -> number of women alone

=> 0.3X --> number of women with partner.

To find total who came with partner, it is essentially double 0.3X, so 0.6X or 60%. Thus people who came alone = 40%.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 160
Own Kudos [?]: 214 [9]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Washington DC
Send PM
[#permalink]
8
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Going for D

consider total = 100 people
From 2)
x is the number of alone people
alone women = x/4
alone men = 3x/4

From the question we get 40 women and 60 men.

Number of men together = number of women together
=> 40 - x/4 = 60 -3x/4
=> x = 40
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 352
Own Kudos [?]: 891 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Kuwait
Concentration: Strategy - Finance
 Q49  V36
Send PM
[#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
I remember the kaplan equation for groups
T = G1 + G2 - B
T: total
G1: group 1
G2: group 2
B: both (overlap between G1 and G2)

Now, given in the question
G1 (men) , G2 ( women)
G1 + B = 60 [ eq. 1]
G2 + B = 40 [ eq. 2]
T = 100 ( assume )

Statement 1: B = 0.5 G1
-----------------------------
you already have two equations with three unknowns: G1,G2 and B
with this third equation you can solve for all variables
The question asks for (G1+G2)/T

Statement 2: G2/(G1+G2) = 0.25
---------------------------------------
Also a third equation that lets you solve for G1,G2 and B

So, my answre is D

Although i didn't solve for the variables or get to the solution, but the quick analysis let me answer the question really fast
P.S. this is a data sufficiency question
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2006
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
i am still with A

(2) 25% of the attendees arriving alone were women.

This says 25% of attendees arriveing alone and NOT 25% of total attendees.

Hence the assumption above that alone women = 0.25* Total attendees is incorrect
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 696
Own Kudos [?]: 107 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
 Q49  V45
Send PM
[#permalink]
1
Kudos
gmat_enthus wrote:
i am still with A

(2) 25% of the attendees arriving alone were women.

This says 25% of attendees arriveing alone and NOT 25% of total attendees.

Hence the assumption above that alone women = 0.25* Total attendees is incorrect


Yes, you are right, read the question again.
I read the question to be 25% of the women attending were alone.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1415
Own Kudos [?]: 308 [10]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Ann Arbor
Concentration: Health Care Marketing
Schools:Ross '10
Send PM
[#permalink]
8
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
IMHO, B is also sufficient.

See attached image.

My pick is D.
Attachments

B.jpeg
B.jpeg [ 18.5 KiB | Viewed 29547 times ]

User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Posts: 396
Own Kudos [?]: 16650 [0]
Given Kudos: 217
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Of all the attendees at a dinner party, 40% were women. If [#permalink]
Of all the attendees at a dinner party, 40% were women. If each attendee arrived at a party either alone of with another attendee of the opposite sex, what percentage of the total number of attendees arrived at the party alone?

1. 50% of the male attendees arrived with a woman.
2. 25% of the attendes arriving alone were women.

This is how I am trying to solve this. Can someone please explain where I am getting it wrong ?

Considering statement 1
Solo Pairs Total
Men 30 30 60
Women 10 30 40
Total 40 60 100


If 30 men come in pairs then they have to be paired with 30 women. And therefore total people arrived solo are 40 and therefore this statement is sufficient.

Considering Statement 2 --> I am really struggling to solve this.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 317 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: DS - Solo + Pair [#permalink]
enigma123 wrote:
Of all the attendees at a dinner party, 40% were women. If each attendee arrived at a party either alone of with another attendee of the opposite sex, what percentage of the total number of attendees arrived at the party alone?

1. 50% of the male attendees arrived with a woman.
2. 25% of the attendes arriving alone were women.

This is how I am trying to solve this. Can someone please explain where I am getting it wrong ?

Considering statement 1
Solo Pairs Total
Men 30 30 60
Women 10 30 40
Total 40 60 100


If 30 men come in pairs then they have to be paired with 30 women. And therefore total people arrived solo are 40 and therefore this statement is sufficient.

Considering Statement 2 --> I am really struggling to solve this.


suppose there are x people in total and y people arrived alone. according to (2), women alone are 0.25y, then women with men are 0.4x-0.25y. men alone are 0.75y, men with women are 0.6x-o.75y. The two should be equal, so we can solve the equation and derive that y=0.4x, so (2) is sufficient.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 195
Own Kudos [?]: 2722 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: DS - Solo + Pair [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
stmnt (2) tells same thing as stmnt (1)

according to the questiom we know that attendes come alone or with opposite sex.

according to the stmnat (2) 25% came alone.
let assume that
women =40, men=60.
40*1/4=10 (came alone).
Remaining women 40-10= 30 should come with opposite sex i.e men.
so number of men come with pairs are 30.
number of men came alone 60-30=30.
% of atenddes came alone are men (30)+ women (10)=40.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Posts: 396
Own Kudos [?]: 16650 [0]
Given Kudos: 217
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: DS - Solo + Pair [#permalink]
Sorry Karishma - But I am struggling to understand how did you get

Since this is 25% of total alone people, 3x is the number of alone men.

Do you mind letting me know please?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 60
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: DS - Solo + Pair [#permalink]
Missed B :(. Thanks for the explanations.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Posts: 396
Own Kudos [?]: 16650 [0]
Given Kudos: 217
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: DS - Solo + Pair [#permalink]
Ok - I have tried it another way. Please let me know if my approach is corrrect.

Women Man Total

Solo 6 18 24

Pair y Y

Total 0.4X 0.6X
X


Let say total solo people = 24 & total people = x

25% of solo people are women i.e. 6 women and 18 men are single.

Let the women in pair be y so man will be y as well.

Two equations are

6+y=0.4x
18+y = 0.6x

x = 60
Single people = 24/60*100= 40%
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64900 [1]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: DS - Solo + Pair [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
enigma123 wrote:
Sorry Karishma - But I am struggling to understand how did you get

Since this is 25% of total alone people, 3x is the number of alone men.

Do you mind letting me know please?


We are given that 25% of people who came alone were women. So 75% of people who came alone were men. So number of men who came alone is three times the number of women who came alone (75% is 3 times 25%).
Since we are assuming that number of women who came alone = x
number of men who came alone will be = 3x
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Re: Of all the attendees at a dinner party, 40% were women. If [#permalink]
what if party had children as well ?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2014
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 40 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.65
WE:Law (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Re: Of all the attendees at a dinner party, 40% were women. If [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Here is a way to think about (2). The number of women arriving alone and the number of men arriving alone must be equal since anyone arriving with a partner must be someone of the opposite sex.

Assume there is 100 people. Therefore, there are 40 women and 60 men. Which number could I subtract from both women and men to leave a ratio of 1 woman to 3 men (because alone women represents 25% of alone people)? If I subtract 10 from each, I get 30 women and 50 men. If I subtract 20 from each, I get 20 women and 40 men. If I subtract 30 from each, I get 10 women and 30 men -- bingo.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Jul 2014
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
Send PM
Re: Of all the attendees at a dinner party, 40% were women. If [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
This is how I did it. Please Correct me if I am wrong.

Let say, total number of people are p. And, total alone people be A.

So we need to find A/p

Women 40p/100 Men=60p/100

1. 1/2 of 60p/100 arrived with a women,so 30p/100 arrived with women, that means (40p/100-30p/100) are alone women and 30p/100 are alone men.

Alone= 10p/100 + 30p/100

2. A/4= women and 3/4A=Men

So 40p/100-A/4=60P/100-3A/4 , that is they should come in pairs.
2A/4=20P/100

So, in both cases we get the ratio of A/P

Hence, D

Please let me know in case I am wrong.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Of all the attendees at a dinner party, 40% were women. If [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderator:
Math Expert
92900 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne