Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Nov 2014, 06:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Parallelism for "to be" verbs

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Posts: 186
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [1] , given: 18

Parallelism for "to be" verbs [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2010, 11:46
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Guys ,
I was going through the MGMAT SC guide and I came across the section which focussed on parallelism for verbs of the form "to be" and verbs of being.
The guide mentioned that when you see a form of the verb "to be" , be sure that the two sides of the verb are parallel .
Then the following example was taken :

The flower bouquet was the husband's giving of love to his wife .

Then the guide explained that the two sides of "was" is not parallel and corrected the sentence as follows

The flower bouquet was the husband's loving gift to his wife.

I don't know how the structural parallelism is maintained in the latter case . Can anyone give some more examples and describe the kind of structures that are intended to be made parallel such as phrases , clauses , etc...
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manhattan GMAT Discount CodesKaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 133
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 7

Re: Parallelism for "to be" verbs [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2010, 12:52
I suspect that in the second example "flower" is parallel to "gift" (both are concrete nouns).
In the first concrete noun "flower" (concrete noun) is not parallel to "giving" (action noun, similar to running, explosion etc.).

Hope I am right.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 133
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 7

Re: Parallelism for "to be" verbs [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2010, 12:56
I recall that MGMAT SC guide has a rule:

1. "concrete" noun can be parallel only "concrete" noun
2. "action" noun can be parallel to "action" and to "-ing" word (
3. "action" noun can be parallel to "-ing" word, if the "-ing" word is followed by "of" (for example, giving of flowers, running of children etc.)
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 188
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 34 [1] , given: 5

Re: Parallelism for "to be" verbs [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2010, 00:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
I believe you are mentioning MGMAT SC in the context of maintaining Parallelism for Linking Verbs. ( Verbs that express the condition of the subject rather than focussing on the action eg.smell, taste, resemble etc ).

Both Sides of the Linking verbs should be parallel as in the above example.
Other examples could be:

Correct: A good deed reflects good character
Incorrect: A good deed reflects having good character.

In the incorrect version the two sides of 'reflect' are not parallel, hence incorrect.

Hope this helps.
_________________

Please give me kudos, if you like the above post.
Thanks.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Posts: 186
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 18

Re: Parallelism for "to be" verbs [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2010, 00:50
Tnx Fijisurf ,
I can make some sense out of it but I want some more examples pinpointing the structure which are suppose to be parallel , different kinds of possible structures which
can exist under this scenario and some examples to work on . MGMAT SC has very less content for this topic. Tnx once again though , atleast now I know something.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Posts: 186
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 18

Re: Parallelism for "to be" verbs [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2010, 00:55
Tnx Devashish...but I am worrying that if it comes in any practice test or actual GMAT , then it will be more subtle and therefore I wanted few more examples with some explanation to work on this topic.
Re: Parallelism for "to be" verbs   [#permalink] 03 Nov 2010, 00:55
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Parallelism & Verb Tense vsquarescube 2 16 Nov 2013, 03:53
Experts publish their posts in the topic Parallelism in linking verb dipeshsalvi 1 24 Oct 2013, 04:43
6 Parallelism: Use of TO in the first verb massi2884 8 23 Apr 2012, 13:41
9 Experts publish their posts in the topic Verb-ed & Verb-ing CAN BE PARALLEL egmat 3 01 Feb 2012, 11:04
4 Parallelism of verbs of being Raths 4 13 Jan 2011, 00:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Parallelism for "to be" verbs

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.