Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 26 Apr 2015, 01:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Parallelism of verbs of being

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Posts: 186
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 64 [1] , given: 18

Parallelism of verbs of being [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2011, 00:03
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Hello all ,
I was going through the Manhattan sentence correction guide and I came across this topic of "Parallelism of verbs of being" . It says that when you see the verbs of the form "to be" , be sure that the two sides of the verb are parallel .

Then the following example was taken to illustrate the point of structural parallelism.

The flower bouquet was the husband's giving of love to his wife.


Then the following explanation was given

The two sides of the being verb was are flower bouquet and Husband's giving of love . In order to achieve parallelism , we can rewrite the sentence replacing giving with the noun gift , so that the two sides of the being verb are structurally similar .

The flower bouquet was the Husband's loving gift to his wife.

Now what structure has been made parallel in the latter sentence . I can't tell what is wrong with the former sentence and how it has been rectified in the latter one .
Would someone please explain this issue and give some more examples.
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: SPG
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 326
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 364 [2] , given: 20

Re: Parallelism of verbs of being [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2011, 07:16
2
This post received
KUDOS
Raths wrote:
Now what structure has been made parallel in the latter sentence . I can't tell what is wrong with the former sentence and how it has been rectified in the latter one .
Would someone please explain this issue and give some more examples.


focus on comparison and not parallelism. the former sentence compares Bouquet with Husband's giving of love ... ask yourself, are they similar? NO

the later sentence compares Bouquet with Husband's gift ... this comparison is correct

there are sentences where both sides of 'to be' are not parallel and they need not be.

Amy is smart.
The coffee is on the table.

HTH

_________________

press kudos, if you like the explanation, appreciate the effort or encourage people to respond.

Download the Ultimate SC Flashcards

1 KUDOS received
Knewton GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 55
Location: NY, NY
Schools: BA New School, PhD Candidate CUNY
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 60 [1] , given: 0

Re: Parallelism of verbs of being [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2011, 08:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
The parallelism issue here -- and Dimitri is right, not all instances of the verb "to be" create parallelism, although strictly speaking this is not a comparison -- is that a gerund -- that is, an -ing word used as a noun -- isn't parallel to a noun. In the first sentence, "bouquet" is improperly paired with "giving." Even though both are functioning as nouns, "giving" is a gerund and therefore not parallel. The second sentence is correct because "bouquet" is paired with "gift," another noun.
_________________

--
Adam
GMAT Instructor
Knewton, Inc.


View Knewton's latest discount for GMAT Club members.
Sign up with Knewton and get all GMAT Club tests for free

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Posts: 147
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 500 Q45 V16
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 10

Re: Parallelism of verbs of being [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2011, 08:47
thanks. agree with knewton and dimitri. :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Parallelism of verbs of being [#permalink] New post 24 Apr 2012, 11:05
I found a problem with the above sentence though. "The flower bouquet was the Husband's loving gift to his wife." - there is no pronoun reference in this sentence. This is what MGMAT calls "possessive poison", but looks like it was overlooked in this sentence.
Re: Parallelism of verbs of being   [#permalink] 24 Apr 2012, 11:05
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Parallelism & Verb Tense vsquarescube 2 16 Nov 2013, 03:53
Experts publish their posts in the topic Parallelism in linking verb dipeshsalvi 1 24 Oct 2013, 04:43
6 Parallelism: Use of TO in the first verb massi2884 8 23 Apr 2012, 13:41
10 Experts publish their posts in the topic Verb-ed & Verb-ing CAN BE PARALLEL egmat 3 01 Feb 2012, 11:04
2 Parallelism for "to be" verbs Raths 5 02 Nov 2010, 11:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Parallelism of verbs of being

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.