Passage 27 (27/63) ======== Since the late 1970's, in the : GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 10 Dec 2016, 09:56

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Passage 27 (27/63) ======== Since the late 1970's, in the

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 912
Followers: 68

Kudos [?]: 562 [0], given: 17

Passage 27 (27/63) ======== Since the late 1970's, in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Apr 2009, 11:39
Passage 27 (27/63)

========
Since the late 1970’s, in the face of a severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the United States have been trying to improve productivity—and therefore enhance their international competitiveness—through cost-cutting programs. (Cost-cutting here is defined as raising labor output while holding the amount of labor constant.) However, from 1978 through 1982, productivity—the value of goods manufactured divided by the amount of labor input—did not improve; and while the results were better in the business upturn of the three years following, they ran 25 percent lower than productivity improvements during earlier, post-1945 upturns. At the same time, it became clear that the harder manufactures worked to implement cost-cutting, the more they lost their competitive edge.

With this paradox in mind, I recently visited 25 companies; it became clear to me that the cost-cutting approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally flawed. Manufacturing regularly observes a “40, 40, 20” rule. Roughly 40 percent of any manufacturing-based competitive advantage derives from long-term changes in manufacturing structure (decisions about the number, size, location, and capacity of facilities) and in approaches to materials. Another 40 percent comes from major changes in equipment and process technology. The final 20 percent rests on implementing conventional cost-cutting. This rule does not imply that cost-cutting should not be tried. The well-known tools of this approach—including simplifying jobs and retraining employees to work smarter, not harder—do produce results. But the tools quickly reach the limits of what they can contribute.

Another problem is that the cost-cutting approach hinders innovation and discourages creative people. As Abernathy’s study of automobile manufacturers has shown, an industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques, reducing its ability to develop new products. And managers under pressure to maximize cost-cutting will resist innovation because they know that more fundamental changes in processes or systems will wreak havoc with the results on which they are measured. Production managers have always seen their job as one of minimizing costs and maximizing output. This dimension of performance has until recently sufficed as a basis of evaluation, but it has created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most factories that has kept away creative managers.

Every company I know that has freed itself from the paradox has done so, in part, by developing and implementing a manufacturing strategy. Such a strategy focuses on the manufacturing structure and on equipment and process technology. In one company a manufacturing strategy that allowed different areas of the factory to specialize in different markets replaced the conventional cost-cutting approach; within three years the company regained its competitive advantage. Together with such strategies, successful companies are also encouraging managers to focus on a wider set of objectives besides cutting costs. There is hope for manufacturing, but it clearly rests on a different way of managing.

1. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with

(A) summarizing a thesis
(B) recommending a different approach
(C) comparing points of view
(D) making a series of predictions
(E) describing a number of paradoxes

2. It can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturers mentioned in line 2 expected that the measures they implemented would

(A) encourage innovation
(B) keep labor output constant
(D) permit business upturns to be more easily predicted
(E) cause managers to focus on a wider set of objectives

3. The primary function of the first paragraph of the passage is to

(A) outline in brief the author’s argument
(B) anticipate challenges to the prescriptions that follow
(C) clarify some disputed definitions of economic terms
(D) summarize a number of long-accepted explanations
(E) present a historical context for the author’s observations

4. The author refers to Abernathy’s study (line 36) most probably in order to

(A) qualify an observation about one rule governing manufacturing
(C) support an earlier assertion about one method of increasing productivity
(D) suggest the centrality in the United States economy of a particular manufacturing industry
(E) given an example of research that has questioned the wisdom of revising a manufacturing strategy

5. The author’s attitude toward the culture in most factories is best described as

(A) cautious
(B) critical
(C) disinterested
(D) respectful

6. In the passage, the author includes all of the following EXCEPT

(A) personal observation
(C) a definition of productivity
(D) an example of a successful company
(E) an illustration of a process technology

7. The author suggests that implementing conventional cost-cutting as a way of increasing manufacturing competitiveness is a strategy that is

(A) flawed and ruinous
(B) shortsighted and difficult to sustain
(C) popular and easily accomplished
(E) misunderstood but promising
=========
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 912
Followers: 68

Kudos [?]: 562 [0], given: 17

Re: RC No 2- MANAGEMENT(Cost Cutting) -Friday [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Apr 2009, 12:15
13 mins and My choices are
1 B 05:46
2 C 01:51
3 E 00:50
4 B 03:37
5 A 00:19
6 D 00:47
7 D 00:23
(Its 1 50 AM )

I need OEs of 4,5,6

OAs are BCEC BED
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Last edited by nitya34 on 09 Apr 2009, 23:03, edited 1 time in total.
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 372
Location: India
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 1

Re: RC No 2- MANAGEMENT(Cost Cutting) -Friday [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Apr 2009, 16:43
13 mins
BCEABCD
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 372
Location: India
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 1

Re: RC No 2- MANAGEMENT(Cost Cutting) -Friday [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Apr 2009, 16:46
Quote:
(Its 1 50 AM )

This thing motivated me ...I was feeling sleepy at 8:48 PM Hope I can continue till 2 tonight
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 139
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: RC No 2- MANAGEMENT(Cost Cutting) -Friday [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Apr 2009, 13:31
BCEBABD
Intern
Joined: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: RC No 2- MANAGEMENT(Cost Cutting) -Friday [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Apr 2009, 21:43
IMO
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 259
Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 9

Re: RC No 2- MANAGEMENT(Cost Cutting) -Friday [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Apr 2009, 22:00
I am getting BCEBBEA

5. This dimension of performance has until recently sufficed as a basis of evaluation, but it has created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most factories that has kept away creative managers.--------> suggests author is critical of the culture prevalent in most factories. Is he cautioning anybody? No. I think he is merely criticizing.

6.
(A) personal observation ---> Every company I know that has freed itself from the paradox has done so, in part, by developing and implementing a manufacturing strategy
(B) a business principle-----> 20 20 40 rule
(C) a definition of productivity ------> given in 1st para
(D) an example of a successful company-------> cited in last para
(E) an illustration of a process technology--------> could not fine one

7. ------> is supported by 2nd para ------> it became clear to me that the cost-cutting approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally flawed
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 985 [0], given: 1

Re: RC No 2- MANAGEMENT(Cost Cutting) -Friday [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Apr 2009, 23:22
1 B 07:52
2 C 01:03
3 E 01:08
4 B 01:32
5 C 01:29
6 B 00:49
7 B 01:05

rampuria wrote:
5. This dimension of performance has until recently sufficed as a basis of evaluation, but it has created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most factories that has kept away creative managers.--------> suggests author is critical of the culture prevalent in most factories. Is he cautioning anybody? No. I think he is merely criticizing.

6.
(A) personal observation ---> Every company I know that has freed itself from the paradox has done so, in part, by developing and implementing a manufacturing strategy
(B) a business principle-----> 20 20 40 rule
(C) a definition of productivity ------> given in 1st para
(D) an example of a successful company-------> cited in last para
(E) an illustration of a process technology--------> could not fine one

Good job

I plan to object the OA of question 4, but I suddently find this:
"..But the tools quickly reach the limits of what they can contribute."

the cost-cutting approach hinders innovation and discourages creative people. As Abernathy’s study of automobile manufacturers has shown, an industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques, reducing its ability to develop new products.

4. The author refers to Abernathy’s study (line 36) most probably in order to

(A) qualify an observation about one rule governing manufacturing
(C) support an earlier assertion about one method of increasing productivity
(D) suggest the centrality in the United States economy of a particular manufacturing industry
(E) given an example of research that has questioned the wisdom of revising a manufacturing strategy

4 makes sense now
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 259
Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 9

Re: RC No 2- MANAGEMENT(Cost Cutting) -Friday [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Apr 2009, 23:31
sondenso , do you agree with my answers of 5 and 6
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

Intern
Joined: 21 May 2015
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Passage 27 (27/63) ======== Since the late 1970's, in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Feb 2016, 12:59
How can answer for Q7 is D it should be A as it is flawed in second Paragraph. Kindly help
Re: Passage 27 (27/63) ======== Since the late 1970's, in the   [#permalink] 05 Feb 2016, 12:59
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Since the late 1970 s, in the face of a severe loss of 5 19 Jun 2012, 02:12
1 Since the late 1970 s, in the face of a severe loss of 7 20 Mar 2012, 21:01
1 Since the late 1970's, in the face of a severe loss of 13 29 Nov 2010, 18:54
Since the late 1970’s, in the face of a severe loss of marke 5 13 May 2009, 23:51
2 Since the late 1970's, in the face of a severe loss of 15 27 Jun 2008, 10:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Passage 27 (27/63) ======== Since the late 1970's, in the

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.