I pick (A).
(A) supports the conclusion by pointing to the inadequacy of evidence for the opposite view
>> I find this good.
(B) supports the conclusion by describing particular experiments
>> There's not particular experiments described in the stem.
(C) supports the conclusion by overgeneralizing from a specific piece of evidence
>> There appears no specific piece of evidence in the stem.
(D) draws a conclusion that is not supported by the premises
>> Not true
(E) rephrases the conclusion without offering any support for
>> He does offer some support.
Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn !