|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 592
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
130
[0], given: 20
|
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]
01 Nov 2012, 04:11
Question Stats:
50% (01:41) correct
50% (02:06) wrong based on 3 sessions
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured traffic accidents would reduce. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles. B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead. C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries. D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years. E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past.
_________________
KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 768
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 19
Kudos [?]:
260
[0], given: 45
|
Re: People traveling in small cars [#permalink]
01 Nov 2012, 06:14
Got A by POE and A also makes sense. The argument only takes into account the people in the car involved in the accident. A gives a reason for why it is possible for larger cars to cause more damage than smaller cars. Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________
Kudos Please... If my post helped.
Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief My Own CR Question 1|My Own CR Question 2|My Own DS Question 1|My Own DS Question 2| My Own PS Question 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 2
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: People traveling in small cars [#permalink]
01 Nov 2012, 10:43
I think it's D.. It cannot be A, since we are concerned with injuries of people driving the cars, and in A, it talks about the injuries of the pedestrians.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 943
Location: India
GMAT Date: 05-29-2013
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
91
[0], given: 57
|
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]
02 Nov 2012, 11:25
gmatbull wrote: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured traffic accidents would reduce.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles. B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead. C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries. D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years. E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past. The argument has too many reasoning errors. But the most obvious one is If people change their cars to larger vehicles , the no. of traffic accidents would reduce. There may be people who are pedestrians or riding bicycle who get involved in accidents with small cars. But may be in such accidents none of the small cars or large vehicle riders get injuries. A outlines the same issue. Lets look at D which cannot be right answer as it kills the conclusion. Conclusion advocates to switch from Small cars to large vehicles but D states that the injuries are seriously declining. That means there is no need of switching. its totally out of scope and Irrelevent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 262
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 42
|
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]
02 Nov 2012, 12:51
by elinimation..only A make sense..A is the best choice among these five ..after all all choice luking too strange..
No any option luks too attractive to weaken the conclusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 151
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
40
[0], given: 24
|
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]
08 Nov 2012, 04:09
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured traffic accidents would reduce.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles.- That's it. If the no. of larger vehicles increase the no. of traffic accidents involving pedestrians will increase thus, weakens the argument. B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead. Out of Scope. C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries. Out of Scope. D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years. ISWAT. Does not talk about larger or smaller vehicles. E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past. Strengthener
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Pill Representative
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 172
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
42
[0], given: 2
|
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink]
08 Nov 2012, 06:13
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured traffic accidents would reduce.So overall this argument is saying that small cars are less safeWhich of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? So... We need evidence that small care are more safeA. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles. This looks good to me. It is providing evidence that small cars are SAFER than big carsB. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead. Nope. Says nothing about comparative safetyC. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries. No, again no comparison here between big/smallD. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years. Nope. This says nothing about the two things side by side. It's good news that numbers are down, but no interest to us in the GMATE. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past. This if anything strengthens the argument. More evidence that larger vehicles are safe.
_________________
Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0
       ... and more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be
[#permalink]
08 Nov 2012, 06:13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|