Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2013, 14:04
Customize  |  Hide

People traveling in small cars are more likely to be

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 592
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 20

GMAT Tests User
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2012, 04:11
00:00

Question Stats:

50% (01:41) correct 50% (02:06) wrong based on 3 sessions
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is
involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured
traffic accidents would reduce.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles.
B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead.
C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries.
D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years.
E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 768
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 260 [0], given: 45

GMAT Tests User
Re: People traveling in small cars [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2012, 06:14
Got A by POE and A also makes sense. The argument only takes into account the people in the car involved in the accident. A gives a reason for why it is possible for larger cars to cause more damage than smaller cars.

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Kudos Please... If my post helped.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief
My Own CR Question 1|My Own CR Question 2|My Own DS Question 1|My Own DS Question 2|
My Own PS Question 1

Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 2
Schools: Rotman '15 (M)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: People traveling in small cars [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2012, 10:43
I think it's D..
It cannot be A, since we are concerned with injuries of people driving the cars, and in A, it talks about the injuries of the pedestrians.
Director
Director
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 943
Location: India
Schools: Cox '16
GMAT Date: 05-29-2013
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 57

CAT Tests
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2012, 11:25
gmatbull wrote:
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is
involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured
traffic accidents would reduce.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles.
B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead.
C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries.
D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years.
E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past.



The argument has too many reasoning errors.
But the most obvious one is If people change their cars to larger vehicles , the no. of traffic accidents would reduce. There may be people who are pedestrians or riding bicycle who get involved in accidents with small cars. But may be in such accidents none of the small cars or large vehicle riders get injuries.

A outlines the same issue.

Lets look at D which cannot be right answer as it kills the conclusion.
Conclusion advocates to switch from Small cars to large vehicles but D states that the injuries are seriously declining. That means there is no need of switching.
its totally out of scope and Irrelevent.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 262
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 42

GMAT Tests User
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2012, 12:51
by elinimation..only A make sense..A is the best choice among these five ..after all all choice luking too strange..

No any option luks too attractive to weaken the conclusion.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 151
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: Tuck '16
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 24

CAT Tests
Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2012, 04:09
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured traffic accidents would reduce.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles.- That's it. If the no. of larger vehicles increase the no. of traffic accidents involving pedestrians will increase thus, weakens the argument.
B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead. Out of Scope.
C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries. Out of Scope.
D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years. ISWAT. Does not talk about larger or smaller vehicles.
E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past. Strengthener
GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 172
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 2

Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2012, 06:13
People traveling in small cars are more likely to be seriously injured than those traveling in larger vehicles when their vehicle is
involved in an accident. Therefore, if more people drove larger vehicles instead of small cars, the number of seriously injured
traffic accidents would reduce.


So overall this argument is saying that small cars are less safe

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

So... We need evidence that small care are more safe

A. In traffic accidents that involve pedestrians, far fewer pedestrians are seriously injured by small cars than by larger vehicles. This looks good to me. It is providing evidence that small cars are SAFER than big cars
B. It is not likely that most people who currently drive small cars will begin to drive larger vehicles instead. Nope. Says nothing about comparative safety
C. Fewer than half of the injuries that are caused in traffic accidents are serious injuries. No, again no comparison here between big/small
D. The proportion of traffic accidents that result in serious injuries has been steadily declining for the last ten years. Nope. This says nothing about the two things side by side. It's good news that numbers are down, but no interest to us in the GMAT
E. Recent technological improvements make larger vehicles safer now than larger vehicles of the past. This if anything strengthens the argument. More evidence that larger vehicles are safe.
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Re: People traveling in small cars are more likely to be   [#permalink] 08 Nov 2012, 06:13
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people doloris 14 11 May 2005, 01:36
New posts A car saves 50% more gas when travelling at 30 miles/hour withme 1 18 Jan 2007, 08:38
New posts 2 Car Travelling udaymathapati 5 08 Sep 2010, 11:30
New posts If only the people using a carpool and only small cars with Runner2 8 15 Apr 2012, 06:22
Moved topic 2 Today s technology allows manufacturers to make small cars TomB 3 04 Aug 2011, 09:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

People traveling in small cars are more likely to be

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.