Hi
Sajjad1994, would appreacite if you could evaluate my essay.
The following appeared in a report presented for discussion at a meeting of the directors of a company that manufactures parts for heavy machinery:
The falling revenues that the company is experiencing coincide with delays in manufacturing. These delays, in turn, are due in large part to poor planning in purchasing metals. Consider further that the manager of the department that handles purchasing of raw materials has an excellent background in general business, psychology, and sociology, but knows little about the properties of metals. The company should, therefore, move the purchasing manager to the sales department and bring in a scientist from the research division to be manager of the purchasing department.
Essay:
The report presented to the directors in a meeting of the manufacturing company concludes that, the cause of falling revenues is delay in manufactoring which in turn is caused by poor planning in purchasing the raw materials. Basis this analogy, the author recommends that the manager of the purchase department should be moved to the sales department and a scientist from the reasearch department should be given the responsibility of managing procurement of raw material, considering the fact that the sceintist would have in dept knowledge of properties of metals as compared to that of purchase manager. Stated in this way, the argument manipulates facts and conveys a distorted view of the situation. The conclusion of the argument relies on assumptions, for which evidence has not been provided. The argument is rather unconvincing, given the obvious flaws.
Firstly, the argument establishes an illogical causality between falling revenues and delay in manufacturing. This is a week and flawed reasoning. There are several factors which could be responsible for dimishing revenues, such as economic recession, a temporary slump in the market, increased competition, spurious quality of products etc. The argument does not provides any information about the analysis of these factors, without which the reasoning of the argument stands questioned.
Secondly, the argument readily assumes poor planning in purchasing raw materials as the only possible factor, causing delay in manufacturing. This argument again has a lot of logical gaps. It does not takes into account other possible causes of manufacturing delays. It is possible that the manufacturing process is a complex and a onerous task and hence occational delays are inevitable. It is also possible that the technology of machinery used in manufacturing process is obsolete which causes frequent machinery breakdowns, causing manufacturing delays. Hence, without considering these factors, it is not logical to consider the flaw in purchase department as the only cause of manufacturing delays.
Finally, the argument makes an illogical recommendation that the purchase maanger should be transferred to the sales team and a scientist from the research team should be given the task of managing procurement. This line of argument is erroneous. Managing procurement requires an individual to posses various skills such as effective communication and negotiation skills, sound management skillls along with an ability to understand the thought process and psychology of suppliers and other intermediaries involved in the procurement process, whereas a basic knowledge of the raw material suffices. However, a scientist might have a sound knowledge of the properties of metals but that is not sufficient to perform the task of procurement. Since, the current manager posseses all these skills as listed above, hence it would not be a wise decision to shift him in other department. Additionally, without contemplating on other possible causes of issues in the procurement, transferring an employee to other department also hampers the moral of other employees as well. Collectively, these factors won’t benefit the company as a whole.
Thus, the argument has several glaring logical gaps. It started with a sound premise but lacked necessary data and logical reasoning to strenghten the premise. If the argument had drawn upon the above mentioned possibilites and filled the holes in the reasoning, then it would have been far sounder as a whole.