Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 18:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Please rate my AWA. Thanks! Kudos for reviews

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Aug 2013
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Please rate my AWA. Thanks! Kudos for reviews [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2013, 12:46
The following appeared in the City Council Proceedings section of the local newspaper in Smithville:
"The city council of Smithville has instituted changes to police procedures to improve the visibility of the police force. These changes required that the town hire more police officers, budget more funds for police overtime, and direct officers to patrol significantly more often on foot rather than from their patrol cars. These improvements in visibility will significantly lower the crime rate in Smithville and make its citizens feel safer."

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide how likely the stated recommendation is to yield the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

---------------
The recommendation by city council at Smithville to increase police force visibility is based on a flawed argument. Firstly, its recommendations for how to increase police visibility are probably not the only ways to do so, and does not adequately explain how those recommendations would avoid making some citizens feel more afraid or even provoke criminals to commit more crime. Secondly, the more egregious flaw is that it does not argue for why police visibility will lower crime in the first place.

First, the recommendation does not explain why police visibility that will be effective in reducing crime and reassuring residents should take the form of more police officers, more overtime, and more foot patrols. Of course, this is one way for the police force to become more visible, and is indeed the most obvious one. However, one weakness of such a method is that it is very expensive. Secondly, such an aggressive show of visibility may provoke criminals, especially organized crime, to prove itself in the form of committing more crime. Also, such a direct show of police presence, may even carry the implicit message that crime is a credible and strong threat in the city, making some citizens feel even more afraid. City council's recommendations and arguments fail to address these concerns and answer why increasing officers and officer patrols are the best way to effectively manifest police visibility. By contrast, some jurisdictions have increased police visibility in a more gentle way which reassures citizens and is much more frugal. For instance, some police forces have participated in community fairs by staffing a table or booth with a pair of police officers armed with brochures, a smile, and a willingness to answer questions. Some jurisdictions have even sent police officers to speak at high school assemblies. These are all simple ideas that city council failed to consider, or at least explain why they have chosen not to follow.

Secondly, the most serious logical error in council's argument is that it simply assumes, without arguing, why police visibility automatically reduces crime. As already mentioned above, some police visibility may even have the opposite effect. It could be that there are deep underlying reasons for crime in their town that are economic or social in nature, such that simply showing the town that the police are there would only be a band-aid solution. Or, it might be that the community needs to be better educated on how to discourage identity theft, or even simply to lock their windows better. The fact that council has failed to support its crucial assumption is the most serious failing of its argument.

The questions that council must answer, then, are what underlying issues play into crime in their town. Perhaps it could hire a consulting firm to investigate this question. Further, council needs to ask the question of what kind of visibility, if any, would be best employed in town. A consulting firm could also be employed to help answer this question. Without getting clear on these questions first, their recommendation as it stands is seriously flawed.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jul 2013
Posts: 197
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 23 [1] , given: 0

Re: Please rate my AWA. Thanks! Kudos for reviews [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2013, 04:53
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
I like this -- I'd love to see three support paragraphs, instead of just two. Plus, that second support paragraph is SUPER long -- almost too long.

I'd put this in a 4.5 range. A third support paragraph would do wonders here.

Good work!
_________________


Brian Lange | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | North Carolina


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Aug 2013
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Please rate my AWA. Thanks! Kudos for reviews [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2013, 08:12
Hi Brian,

Thanks for the feedback, helpful advice. Question. If at the time I couldn't think of 3 points, but only 2, should I just break up the 2 points into 3 support paragraphs (i.e. split my second paragraph into two)? Because you advised me to use 3 support paragraphs.

B

brianlange77 wrote:
I like this -- I'd love to see three support paragraphs, instead of just two. Plus, that second support paragraph is SUPER long -- almost too long.

I'd put this in a 4.5 range. A third support paragraph would do wonders here.

Good work!
Expert Post
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jul 2013
Posts: 197
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Re: Please rate my AWA. Thanks! Kudos for reviews [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2013, 17:53
Expert's post
Remember -- this is not a submission for a Pulitzer Prize. Figure out a way to come up with three points -- they don't need all be A+ thinking, but 3 'points' will create a better looking paragraph than just 2 'points.

Hope this helps.

-Brian
_________________


Brian Lange | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | North Carolina


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile

Re: Please rate my AWA. Thanks! Kudos for reviews   [#permalink] 31 Aug 2013, 17:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Please rate my AWA, thanks. JeremyW. 1 15 Sep 2013, 23:52
Experts publish their posts in the topic Please grade my AWA. Thanks so much! Kudos for review. bermanator 3 31 Aug 2013, 14:53
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Please rate my AWA! Kudos for reviews bermanator 1 19 Aug 2013, 13:47
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Please rate my first AWA! Kudos for reviews :) pnf619 6 26 Jul 2013, 03:51
Please rate my AWA - Thanks! mkuntsal 0 06 Sep 2012, 08:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Please rate my AWA. Thanks! Kudos for reviews

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.