Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 10:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Please rate my essay

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 4

Please rate my essay [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2012, 04:08
I found the argument to be unusually short and too vague. Don't expect this to be anywhere near to the real one on D day found this more involving to think about during a mock test.

Would really appreciate it if someone rated it. :-D

'Since no business can be all things at once, companies that specialize in one product or service are more efficient than those that offer a diverse product mix'

In the argument the author has formed a position that a company with a core competency in a single product or service will be more efficient than diversified companies. The author notes that this can be concluded on the basis of the premise that no single company can do all types of business. However, such a narrow deduction of the author based on a wide generalization is hasty and unreasonable.
In forming the conclusion, the author has taken into account a few suppositions which may not hold true in the real world, causing the argument to be inaccurate and illogical.

Firstly, the author has explicitly stated that a company offering a single service or manufacturing a single product will be more efficient than companies offering various types of goods and services. The author has not accounted for other factors which could affect the company’s operating activities and in affect its efficiency such as the demand for a product or service, price of inputs among others. Change in any of these factors in respect of a particular offering could lead a diverse company to change its focus on any other product or service offered by the company while still maintain the overall efficiency in the firm. However, a single product company would not have such a course of action available for itself.

Further, the author in comparing the efficiency of companies based on their offerings and concluding that a single product company is more efficient has discounted the supposition that a diversified company offering different types of goods and services may be reaping economies of scale. In doing so, the diversified company would actually have a higher availability of resources at comparatively less cost. Accordingly, the diversified company could well be a more efficient company than a company offering a single service or producing a singular product.

In view of the above discussed flaws in the assumptions of the author, we can conclude that the main position of the author in the argument is weak and not well supported. The author could have strengthened his claim with adequate details and relevant comparisons.
Expert Post
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 644
Location: Cambridge, MA
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 183 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: Please rate my essay [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2012, 12:45
Expert's post
Hi Shalabh,

You're right that this argument was too vague--in fact, it's not even an argument! This was clearly a prompt for the discontinued Issue essay, which is the source of your confusion!

Regards,
_________________

Eli Meyer
Kaplan Teacher
http://www.kaptest.com/GMAT

Prepare with Kaplan and save $150 on a course!

Image

Kaplan Reviews

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 4

Re: Please rate my essay [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2012, 12:54
Thanks for your reply.

Could you also give me a broad feedback in regard to the structure and flow of my response in this case?
Expert Post
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 644
Location: Cambridge, MA
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 183 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: Please rate my essay [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2012, 14:15
Expert's post
ShalabhAr wrote:
Thanks for your reply.

Could you also give me a broad feedback in regard to the structure and flow of my response in this case?
Structure and flow look fine!
_________________

Eli Meyer
Kaplan Teacher
http://www.kaptest.com/GMAT

Prepare with Kaplan and save $150 on a course!

Image

Kaplan Reviews

Re: Please rate my essay   [#permalink] 26 Jul 2012, 14:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Please rate my essay. GabrielRigo 2 24 Oct 2012, 04:22
Please Rate My Essay sdrobbi 0 03 Oct 2012, 17:15
Please rate my essay iwillcrackgmat 0 01 Aug 2012, 21:27
please rate my essay swatikrishnaRamRaj 0 16 Jul 2012, 02:59
Please rate my essay stator 0 25 Oct 2011, 20:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Please rate my essay

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.