|
Author |
Message |
|
Intern
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Posts: 2
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Please review my AWA!!! GMAT Tomorrow!!! [#permalink]
08 Aug 2010, 03:44
Hi, I have a humble request. If possible, could you please rate my AOI? I shall be extremely grateful.
Thanking in anticipation Saarthak.
“Corporations and other businesses should try to eliminate the many ranks and salary grades that classify employees according to their experience and expertise. A ‘flat’ organizational structure is more likely to encourage collegiality and cooperation among employees.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Whether a flat organisational structure ecourages collegiality and cooperation among employees depends on the whether this structures solves the purpose of the organisation and of its employees. Majority of the organisations in world follow heirarchial structure. Therefore, in my view, flat organisational structure does not be supposed to solve purposes of organistaions and its employess.
The chief reason for my view is that ranks classify employess on the basis of their expertise and knowledge of their industry and work. Rank wise classification helps overall distribution and management of the work of the organisation. The higher ranked person manages a task by coordinating with people working under. In such a structure, responsibilities can be given to people who can ably manage the work, handle risks invovled and take affirmative actions. Since everybody is not capable of handling such a demanding role, people who have been ranked on the basis of their experience and knowledge are best suited for this role.
Another reason for my view is that every employee needs a motivating reason to do his or her job in the best possible manner. For many employees, earning more money is a very strong motivating factor, which makes them perform better. If, on performing better, an employee becomes more likely to rise higher in rank and thereby draw more salary, then, most employees will prefer grwoing like this. And, when an employee grows, the company grows and vice versa. In a flat structure, there is no scope of money being a motivating reason, therefore, in my opinion, employees won't put efforts to do their jobs in the best possible way.
However, people who oppose my view might say that in heirarchial organisations greed and competitive spirit is stronger and employees in such organisations are self centered and have less regard for equality. It might be true, but does it help in growth of the organisation? Does it help in growth of an individual?
In sum, I concur that the merits of rank and grade based organisational structure outweigh the merits of a flat organisational structure. Therefore, rank and grade based organisational structure must remain and continue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Status: The last round
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 1327
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Followers: 43
Kudos [?]:
383
[0], given: 156
|
Re: Please review my AWA!!! GMAT Tomorrow!!! [#permalink]
08 Aug 2010, 03:56
A few observation points from my side -The last two paragraphs seem to be a little small. This makes the whole essay a little short of words. -The chief or primary reason given in the second para should be given in the end, before conclusion. -The use of word "my" & "I" is a bit awkward. Try to avoid these words. I hope you have followed the great chineseburned guide of AWA. If not, kindly do so at your earliest. how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.htmlBest of luck for tomorrow & keep in touch.
_________________
[ From 470 to 680-My Story ] [ My Last Month Before Test ] [ GMAT Prep Analysis Tool ] [ US. Business School Dashboard ] [ Int. Business School Dashboard ]
I Can, I Will
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Founder
Status: On Vacation :-)
Affiliations: UA-1K, SPG-G, HH-D
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 10400
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Hospitality and Tourism)
Followers: 1366
Kudos [?]:
4190
[0], given: 3121
|
Re: Please review my AWA!!! GMAT Tomorrow!!! [#permalink]
08 Aug 2010, 15:39
Good Luck! Don't worry about AWA too much. Let us know how it goes.
_________________
Founder of GMAT Club
Just starting out with GMAT? Start here... | Want to know your GMAT Score? Try GMAT Score Estimator Need GMAT Book Recommendations? Best GMAT Books
Co-author of the GMAT Club tests
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Posts: 2
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Please review my AWA!!! GMAT Tomorrow!!! [#permalink]
09 Aug 2010, 19:05
Got 700. Q50, V36. I forgot to keep a check on time in verbal, so had to attempt final 10-12 questions in a little hurry. That cost me probably 2 questions.  else the score would have been 710 or 720. Anyways. that's it. AWA went fine, didn't have any problems attempting essays. Had a good look at the templates and duplicated them
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Posts: 415
Location: Europe
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
28
[0], given: 26
|
Re: Please review my AWA!!! GMAT Tomorrow!!! [#permalink]
21 Sep 2010, 07:07
saarthakvats wrote: AWA went fine, didn't have any problems attempting essays. Had a good look at the templates and duplicated them  In the hope you still lurk around the forum, which templates are you talking about? Chinesebured ones? By the way you've got a nice score, yet I would not recommend anyone to be under such pressure as you were one day before the test. Best regards,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 47
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Please review my AWA!!! GMAT Tomorrow!!! [#permalink]
05 Feb 2011, 08:11
Could someone please rate my AWA ?In the statement above, the author argues that the corporations and other businesses should try to eliminate the many ranks and salary grades that classify employees according to their experience and expertise. By making the organizational structure flat, it is more likely to encourage collegiality and coperation among employees. My opinion stands on the opposite side stressing more that the ranks and grades are indeed required in smooth functioning of an organization. Ranks and salary grades helps an organisation to manage it better. They filter employees based on different segments with different experience and expertise. This helps the organization to create policies specific to particular grades and ranks. Example a manager might be allowed to approve leaves of his subordinates. So his grade only gets the kind of approval rights required. He might be given higher allowances based on his rank as a manager. In addition to the above paragraph, grades and ranks allows an employee to understand the kind of responsibility and position he has within an organization. It helps him to understand the kind of contribution he or she makes at that level of employment. Since employees can have different experience and expertise, they would like to have themselves differentiated from his subordinates. A lot of employees take pride in the kind of senior ranks and grades they have. This also ensures that his juniors give him the kind of respect he deserves at an organizational level. In a professional organization, the cooperation amoung employees comes automatically irrespective of the rank people hold. Cooperation and collegiality is a part of the attitude one posseses and is not respective with his grade and rank. To sum, the argument seems to be flawed and unconvincing since the cooperation and collegiality being a part of the attitude are separate from the ranks and grades employees hold. Also, ranks and grades form a very basic part of a professional organization providing it with the right structure for day to day working. It provides the organization with a concrete hirearchy and helps make the reporting structure more transparent. saarthakvats wrote: Hi, I have a humble request. If possible, could you please rate my AOI? I shall be extremely grateful.
Thanking in anticipation Saarthak.
“Corporations and other businesses should try to eliminate the many ranks and salary grades that classify employees according to their experience and expertise. A ‘flat’ organizational structure is more likely to encourage collegiality and cooperation among employees.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Whether a flat organisational structure ecourages collegiality and cooperation among employees depends on the whether this structures solves the purpose of the organisation and of its employees. Majority of the organisations in world follow heirarchial structure. Therefore, in my view, flat organisational structure does not be supposed to solve purposes of organistaions and its employess.
The chief reason for my view is that ranks classify employess on the basis of their expertise and knowledge of their industry and work. Rank wise classification helps overall distribution and management of the work of the organisation. The higher ranked person manages a task by coordinating with people working under. In such a structure, responsibilities can be given to people who can ably manage the work, handle risks invovled and take affirmative actions. Since everybody is not capable of handling such a demanding role, people who have been ranked on the basis of their experience and knowledge are best suited for this role.
Another reason for my view is that every employee needs a motivating reason to do his or her job in the best possible manner. For many employees, earning more money is a very strong motivating factor, which makes them perform better. If, on performing better, an employee becomes more likely to rise higher in rank and thereby draw more salary, then, most employees will prefer grwoing like this. And, when an employee grows, the company grows and vice versa. In a flat structure, there is no scope of money being a motivating reason, therefore, in my opinion, employees won't put efforts to do their jobs in the best possible way.
However, people who oppose my view might say that in heirarchial organisations greed and competitive spirit is stronger and employees in such organisations are self centered and have less regard for equality. It might be true, but does it help in growth of the organisation? Does it help in growth of an individual?
In sum, I concur that the merits of rank and grade based organisational structure outweigh the merits of a flat organisational structure. Therefore, rank and grade based organisational structure must remain and continue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Please review my AWA!!! GMAT Tomorrow!!!
[#permalink]
05 Feb 2011, 08:11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn
|