Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Apr 2014, 08:31

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 286
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 277 [2] , given: 19

GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself [#permalink] New post 05 May 2012, 21:42
2
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (low)

Question Stats:

69% (02:44) correct 30% (01:45) wrong based on 153 sessions
Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself in the negligible crack between the
American right and left will do little to expand the public debate. What America needs is a
permanent third party. Some claim that America’s success stems from the two party
system.
These people say that a third party would make the passage of legislation and thus
governance impossible. Furthermore, they point to the current sluggish pace of government
as proof that the country cannot bear the burden of a third party. Yet, most European
countries have multi-party systems and few complain about any inability to govern
there.
Which of the following best describes the functions of the two sections in boldface in
the argument above?
A) The first is the main point of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that point.
b) The first opposes the premises of the argument; the second is the claim that the argument
supports.
c) The first supports the main position held by opponents of the main point; the second is a
premise that argues against that position.
d) The first is the primary claim made by opponents of the main point of the argument; the
second is evidence proposed in opposition to the first.
e) The first is a claim made by opponents of the main point of the argument; the second is the
claim that the first opposes.

Main CR Qs link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.

Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 58
GMAT Date: 09-10-2012
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 14

Re: Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2012, 02:13
Has to be D.

Lets analyse each part of the argument separately. Choosing 2nd part first as it is straight forward an example/evidence given in opposition to the context of the passage, notice the usage of "YET". Going by POE, D is the only option.

Lets look at the first part: In the first para, author is arguing in the favor of a third party in America, but in the bolded line he says, " some claims the opposite". Hence it is a claim made by the other who do not believe in need of a third party i.e opponents.

HTH
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 565
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 75

Re: Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2012, 09:02
d) The first is the primary claim made by opponents of the main point of the argument; the
second is evidence proposed in opposition to the first.

Some claim that America’s success stems from the two party
system.


is the primary claim because it is further explained ... furthermore , they point to the current sluggish pace of government
as proof that the country cannot bear the burden of a third party.

otherwise we would have opted for (E) which says that the 1st boldface is just a claim and not the primary claim.

Yet, most European
countries have multi-party systems and few complain about any inability to govern
there.


we can figure out "yet" which is throwing contrast in opposition of the primary claim mentioned above in the boldface by quoting example of European countries.

(D) Wins.
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

VP
VP
User avatar
Status: I'm back and not stopping until I hit 760+
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1321
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: Wharton '17
GPA: 3.5
WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 169

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2013, 08:54
GetThisDone wrote:
Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself in the negligible crack between the
American right and left will do little to expand the public debate. What America needs is a
permanent third party. Some claim that America’s success stems from the two party
system.
These people say that a third party would make the passage of legislation and thus
governance impossible. Furthermore, they point to the current sluggish pace of government
as proof that the country cannot bear the burden of a third party. Yet, most European
countries have multi-party systems and few complain about any inability to govern
there.
Which of the following best describes the functions of the two sections in boldface in
the argument above?
A) The first is the main point of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that point.
b) The first opposes the premises of the argument; the second is the claim that the argument
supports.
c) The first supports the main position held by opponents of the main point; the second is a
premise that argues against that position.
d) The first is the primary claim made by opponents of the main point of the argument; the
second is evidence proposed in opposition to the first.
e) The first is a claim made by opponents of the main point of the argument; the second is the
claim that the first opposes.

Main CR Qs link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html


Very good question here, let's try to analize it quickly.

CPX works pretty good on this one.
We actually have a nice CP, P combo.
CP= Counterpremise
P=Premise

So the first bold actually supports an opposing view and the second bold face in fact support the main conclusion of the argument
Let's take a peep at the answer choices

I think C and D are pretty close here. But note that C says that the bold face is a premise, while D says that it is the counterconclusion.
Now, the second part is very similar in both as well. So it is going to be a delicate choice. Let's proceed, shall we?
So what is the first bold actually? From my understanding, it is in fact a counterpremise as a stated before.

Some claim that America’s success stems from the two party
system.
(Counterpremise) These people say that a third party would make the passage of legislation and thus
governance impossible (Counterconclusion)

So for me the answer should be C, but I'm probably making a mistake in my reasoning.
Experts, will you shed some light on this one?
Thanks in advance
Cheers
J :)
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: I'm back and not stopping until I hit 760+
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1321
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: Wharton '17
GPA: 3.5
WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 169

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2013, 08:56
thevenus wrote:
d) The first is the primary claim made by opponents of the main point of the argument; the
second is evidence proposed in opposition to the first.

Some claim that America’s success stems from the two party
system.


is the primary claim because it is further explained ... furthermore , they point to the current sluggish pace of government
as proof that the country cannot bear the burden of a third party.

otherwise we would have opted for (E) which says that the 1st boldface is just a claim and not the primary claim.

Yet, most European
countries have multi-party systems and few complain about any inability to govern
there.


we can figure out "yet" which is throwing contrast in opposition of the primary claim mentioned above in the boldface by quoting example of European countries.

(D) Wins.


Is it really the primary claim for that reason? Check my post above. Would be happy to exchange thoughts. I think you approach is valid and you are probably correct.
But let me know your thoughts on why D over C.

Thanks
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 175
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 84

Re: Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself [#permalink] New post 20 Nov 2013, 17:24
GetThisDone wrote:
Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself in the negligible crack between the
American right and left will do little to expand the public debate. What America needs is a
permanent third party. Some claim that America’s success stems from the two party
system.
These people say that a third party would make the passage of legislation and thus
governance impossible. Furthermore, they point to the current sluggish pace of government
as proof that the country cannot bear the burden of a third party. Yet, most European
countries have multi-party systems and few complain about any inability to govern
there.
Which of the following best describes the functions of the two sections in boldface in
the argument above?
A) The first is the main point of the argument; the second is a premise that supports that point.
b) The first opposes the premises of the argument; the second is the claim that the argument
supports.
c) The first supports the main position held by opponents of the main point; the second is a
premise that argues against that position.
d) The first is the primary claim made by opponents of the main point of the argument; the
second is evidence proposed in opposition to the first.
e) The first is a claim made by opponents of the main point of the argument; the second is the
claim that the first opposes.

Main CR Qs link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html


The answer can be narrow down to C & D . But how to differentiate between Whether the 2nd Bold face was Premise or not ? A close look to the argument structure Premise - Main conclusion- Opponents claim- Reason- Evidence- Evidence in opposition of Opponents claim. So here we go right answer D.

Hope this helps :-D :misbrand :banana
_________________

Thanks for Posting

LEARN TO ANALYSE

+1 kudos if you like

Manager
Manager
Status: Respect GMAT.. Some day u will be graced!!!
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 119
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 14

Re: Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2014, 04:30
I would like to explain why D is wrong.

d) The first is the primary claim made by opponents of the main point of the argument; the
second is evidence proposed in opposition to the first.

Furthermore, they point to the current sluggish pace of government as proof that the country cannot bear the burden of a third party. Yet, most European
countries have multi-party systems and few complain about any inability to govern there.


The second bold faced statement is not directly opposing the first but rather opposing the statement mentioned in the above passage(please look for the contrast shown here using the word "yet").
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks :-)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 267
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 29

CAT Tests
Re: Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2014, 04:51
D is my choice.The first BF is the counter conclusion:there shouldn't be any third party.The second BF is evidence against the counter conclusion ie premise.

Posted from my mobile device Image
GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 114

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 4

Re: Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2014, 09:42
cssk wrote:
I would like to explain why D is wrong.

d) The first is the primary claim made by opponents of the main point of the argument; the
second is evidence proposed in opposition to the first.

Furthermore, they point to the current sluggish pace of government as proof that the country cannot bear the burden of a third party. Yet, most European
countries have multi-party systems and few complain about any inability to govern there.


The second bold faced statement is not directly opposing the first but rather opposing the statement mentioned in the above passage(please look for the contrast shown here using the word "yet").


Hi Cssk,

I'm afraid you are mistaken here.
D is correct.
That Europe has many parties and it works fine is evidence against "America’s success" coming "from the two party system". I.e. if Europe can succeed with many parties America can not have succeeded because of the 2 party system,

James
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Manager
Manager
Status: Respect GMAT.. Some day u will be graced!!!
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 119
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 14

Re: Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2014, 11:02
I agree. Thanks plumber250 for pointing that out.
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks :-)

Re: Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself   [#permalink] 03 Jan 2014, 11:02
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts In a move that surprised many political analysts, ngobaotrung 23 09 May 2005, 23:40
New posts CR two party political system mahesh004 4 24 Oct 2005, 19:13
New posts political parties Ravshonbek 5 30 Aug 2007, 09:23
Moved topic 2 In a move that surprised many political analysts, zoom612 10 29 Jun 2006, 09:35
New posts Insurgent political parties that are profoundly dissatisfied vjsharma25 7 12 Mar 2011, 20:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Political analyst: A party that temporarily positions itself

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.