Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 01:39

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 223
Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2009, 05:36
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

66% (02:40) correct 34% (02:21) wrong based on 109 sessions
Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, illegal immigration is an important issue in the current race for mayor. Of the two candidates for mayor, one supports a plan that would attempt to deport the city’s 9,000 illegal immigrants and the other does not. Surveys consistently show that about 60% of the city’s residents are opposed to the plan, while about 35% are in support of the plan. Therefore, the candidate who does not support the plan will win the election for mayor.

All of the following statements weaken the analyst’s argument, EXCEPT:

A. In the city at issue, most voters make their voting decisions based on the candidates’ positions on abortion.
B. Of the 35% of residents who support the plan, some are willing to consider alternate plans for addressing illegal immigration.
C. Many of the residents who oppose the plan are not registered voters.
D. The candidate who supports the plan is the incumbent mayor, and has been elected to four consecutive terms despite taking controversial positions on many important issues.
E. Just under 30% of the city’s residents are illegal immigrants who cannot vote.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 126
Location: India
Schools: NUS, NTU, SMU, AGSM, Melbourne School of Business
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 12

GMAT Tests User
Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2009, 11:36
hogann wrote:
Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, illegal immigration is an important issue in the current race for mayor. Of the two candidates for mayor, one supports a plan that would attempt to deport the city’s 9,000 illegal immigrants and the other does not. Surveys consistently show that about 60% of the city’s residents are opposed to the plan, while about 35% are in support of the plan. Therefore, the candidate who does not support the plan will win the election for mayor.

All of the following statements weaken the analyst’s argument, EXCEPT:

A. In the city at issue, most voters make their voting decisions based on the candidates’ positions on abortion.
B. Of the 35% of residents who support the plan, some are willing to consider alternate plans for addressing illegal immigration.
C. Many of the residents who oppose the plan are not registered voters.
D. The candidate who supports the plan is the incumbent mayor, and has been elected to four consecutive terms despite taking controversial positions on many important issues.
E. Just under 30% of the city’s residents are illegal immigrants who cannot vote.


My choice is D. The conclusion is not drawn on the basis of candidate's performance but on the illegal immigrant issue at hand hence does not effect analyst's argument. Also, all other options are in some way or the other related to premise.
_________________

GMAT offended me. Now, its my turn!
Will do anything for Kudos! Please feel free to give one. :)

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2009
Posts: 67
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 5

Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2009, 13:18
I would go with [B].
Looking for something that says that despite what the survey results indicate, supporting the plan may not result in the candidate losing the election.

[A] states that abortion is a higher priority issue than immigration so support/opposition to the immigration plan will not matter.
[C], [E] state that a large proportion of the number who support the plan are either inelligible to vote or not registered to vote, so survey results are questionable.
[D] suggests that the candidate who supports the plan has won in the past despite taking positions that may be against popular support. (read controversial)
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 56
Location: New York, NY
Schools: Columbia, Johnson, Tuck, Stern
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [1] , given: 2

Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2009, 15:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
B here as well.

Took me a while to figure it out but heres my explanation:

B says the 35% people who support the plan aren't really sure so they might switch to the other candidate. This supports the analyst argument that the person who oppose the plan will win the election.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 367
Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2009, 18:04
hogann wrote:
Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, illegal immigration is an important issue in the current race for mayor. Of the two candidates for mayor, one supports a plan that would attempt to deport the city’s 9,000 illegal immigrants and the other does not. Surveys consistently show that about 60% of the city’s residents are opposed to the plan, while about 35% are in support of the plan. Therefore, the candidate who does not support the plan will win the election for mayor.

All of the following statements weaken the analyst’s argument, EXCEPT:

A. In the city at issue, most voters make their voting decisions based on the candidates’ positions on abortion.
B. Of the 35% of residents who support the plan, some are willing to consider alternate plans for addressing illegal immigration.
C. Many of the residents who oppose the plan are not registered voters.
D. The candidate who supports the plan is the incumbent mayor, and has been elected to four consecutive terms despite taking controversial positions on many important issues.
E. Just under 30% of the city’s residents are illegal immigrants who cannot vote.


This is a very straight forward question.
Candidate M1 proposed a plan to deport illegal immigrants. 35% of the population support it. Candidate M2 is silent about the issue, 60% of the population seem to support him. Therefore, M2 will win is the conclusion. We have to find the option that does not weaken the author's argument, in other words, strengthens it, affirms that M2 will win.

A - Abortion is out of scope.
B - If out of 35% some are willing to consider alternate plans, they may shift to M2 and M2 will win.
C - 60% group mostly contains unregistered voters. So they cannot vote and less chances of M2 winning.
D - M1 is incumbent (currently in office) but statement has nothing to do.
E - 30% are illegal immigrants who cannot vote, this may be divided between the two groups that take different stances as noticed, this statement has nothing to do with the argument at hand.

Direct win is B.
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2009
Posts: 54
Location: pitt
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2009, 18:22
B .. its pretty clear
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2008
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2009, 18:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
If E has no effect on the argument, then it could be the ans.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 223
Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2009, 07:18
OA B

This does not weaken the argument. In fact, if some of those who support the plan are willing to reconsider, they may ultimately oppose the original plan and decide to vote for the candidate who is also in opposition.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Posts: 494
Schools: Fuqua
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 15

GMAT Tests User
Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2009, 14:01
Conclusion of the argument is - the candidate who does not support the plan(deporting 9000 illegal immigrants.

One mayor supports the plan. 35% of the city residents support the plan
Another mayor does NOT support the plan. 60% of the city residents does NOT support the plan.

Based on the figures - because 60% of the city residents do NOT support the plan of deporting, the mayor who do not support the plan will win the election.

Now look at the ans choices and eliminate the one which DOES NOT weaken the conclusion.

A. This will be weakening the conclusion because people support the mayor based on his / her position on voters but NOT on the proposed plan in discussion. Rule out this option.
B. Possible ans.
C. This choice also weakens the conclusion because many of the residents who oppose the plan(many of 60% residents) cannot vote. So there is no guarantee that the mayor opposing the plan will win the election. Rule out this option.
D. This choice also weakens the conclusion because the mayor who supports the plan is currently the mayor and has record of winning the elections inspite of him taking the controversial positions on imp issues. So there is no guarantee that the mayor who does not support the plan will win the elections. Rule out this option.
E. This choice also weakens the conclusion because 30% are illegal immigrants and they cannot vote. And from the remaining 70%, 35% support the mayor who supports the plan. Hence there is no guarantee that the mayor who opposes the plan will win the election. Rule out this option.

So my take is B.
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Other
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 660 Q V
GPA: 3.64
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 76915

CAT Tests
Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 19 Oct 2009, 03:55
B support and so dose not weaken

E is irrelevant and so dose not weaken

both B and E is correct. WRONG QUESTION.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 64
Schools: Wharton, Kellogg, Duke (Health care management)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 3

Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 22 Oct 2009, 15:25
E weaken analyst assumption that all the residents are eligible to vote and the survey results are basis for election results. Just under 30% could be 27, 28, 29%... so that would mean out of 60%, only about 31-33% are voters which makes the 35% residents who support the mayor biggest group -> means mayor could win.

B is the correct answer because it throws open the possibility that out of the 35% some may vote for other plans.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2009, 16:39
nice explanation..

speeddeamon wrote:
E weaken analyst assumption that all the residents are eligible to vote and the survey results are basis for election results. Just under 30% could be 27, 28, 29%... so that would mean out of 60%, only about 31-33% are voters which makes the 35% residents who support the mayor biggest group -> means mayor could win.

B is the correct answer because it throws open the possibility that out of the 35% some may vote for other plans.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1691
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 289 [0], given: 36

GMAT Tests User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 21 Mar 2011, 00:14
The answer is B, as on a closer look it seems to strengthen the conclusion.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1726
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 66

Kudos [?]: 297 [0], given: 109

GMAT Tests User
Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2011, 15:08
+1 B

Good question.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2011
Posts: 178
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 8

GMAT Tests User
Re: Wed Q2 - Border City [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2011, 00:07
+1 FOR B
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 191
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: Q V
GPA: 3.7
WE: Account Management (Consumer Products)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 4

Re: Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2012, 20:46
Clear answer is B, because all others in some way weaken the argument.
The argument being the "candidate who does not support the plan will win the election for mayor. "

If the 35% of people are looking for an alternative plan to address illegal immigrants has no relevance on how the candidate will win/lose the election for mayor.
_________________

DETERMINED TO BREAK 700!!!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 143
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 24

GMAT Tests User
Re: Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2012, 04:22
B for me
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 193
Location: Germany
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: IE '15 (M)
GMAT 1: Q V
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2012, 05:37
B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Do till 740 :)
Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 105
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 460 Q35 V20
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 18

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, [#permalink] New post 13 Apr 2012, 23:32
A does not weaken at all ?

why cant A be the answer?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 70
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

Re: Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, [#permalink] New post 01 Sep 2013, 09:48
The analyst argues that the mayoral candidate who opposes the deportation plan
will win the governor’s race because 60% of city residents also oppose the plan.
The analyst assumes that a majority of residents will vote for this candidate
based on his position on illegal immigration. Any statement that calls this
assumption into question will weaken the argument. We are looking for the one
statement that does NOT call this assumption into question.
(A) This statement calls into question the assumption that voters will cast their
ballots based on the illegal immigration issue. Therefore, this statement
weakens the analyst's argument.
(B) CORRECT. This does not weaken the argument. In fact, if some of those
who support the plan are willing to reconsider, they may ultimately oppose the
original plan and decide to vote for the candidate who is also in opposition. If
anything, this would help justify the analyst's claim that the candidate who
opposes the plan will win the election.
(C) This statement calls into question the assumption that a majority of residents
will vote for the candidate who opposes the plan. If many of these residents are
not registered voters, they will not be able to vote, regardless of their position on
the immigration issue. This weakens the argument.
(D) This calls into question the assumption that the residents will vote based on
the illegal immigration issue. This statement shows that voters have a history of
voting for the incumbent despite his controversial position on important issues. It
is possible that the voters will again vote for the incumbent, even if he has taken
an unpopular position on the illegal immigration issue. This weakens the
argument.
(E) If just under 30% of the residents are illegal immigrants, it is likely that many
of the 60% in opposition to the plan are actually illegal immigrants themselves. If
these people can’t vote, it is less likely that the candidate who opposes the plan
will win.
Re: Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city,   [#permalink] 01 Sep 2013, 09:48
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
13 Experts publish their posts in the topic Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, greatps24 8 17 Feb 2013, 02:00
1 City official: In order to revitalize our city s downtown soumyaranjandash 3 19 Aug 2012, 23:20
1 Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, monir6000 4 16 May 2012, 21:09
Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city, asmit123 7 12 Jul 2011, 08:55
2 City official: In order to revitalize our city's downtown vscid 6 30 Jan 2010, 14:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Political Analyst: Because our city is a border city,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.