Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Sep 2014, 10:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2008, 10:02
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:59) correct 45% (01:53) wrong based on 279 sessions
Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. However, buying prescription drug coverage, like buying health insurance coverage, is not like buying a car. The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs. Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time; this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is a fact that the candidate argues against; the second is the ultimate claim that the candidate supports.
B.The first is an observation which the candidate acknowledges as true but to which he is ultimately opposed; the second is a claim that the candidate uses as evidence to support his ultimate position.
C.The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.
D.The first is an observation that the candidate argues against; the second is an observation that the candidate supports.
E.The first is an observation made by the candidate; the second is an assertion that the candidate ultimately opposes.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2008, 10:27
yavasani wrote:
Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. However, buying prescription drug coverage, like buying health insurance coverage, is not like buying a car. The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs. Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time; this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.

The buyer may or may not the same diseases in future. Therefore, rather than subsidizing the prescription drug plans, government should offer some coverage alternatives.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is a fact that the candidate argues against; the second is the ultimate claim that the candidate supports.

Wrong. The ultimate claim is that this is not an effective way. Goverment should some alternative drug coverage plan.

B.The first is an observation which the candidate acknowledges as true but to which he is ultimately opposed; the second is a claim that the candidate uses as evidence to support his ultimate position.

Close but wrong. The observation is true government plan but author is against it. But author is using "The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs" assertion to make the cliam that this is not a good plan. Use some alternative...drug coverage plan

C.The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Correct. Second "consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs" is the asertion that author is making to support his claim.

D.The first is an observation that the candidate argues against; the second is an observation that the candidate supports.

Wrong. Second is not an observation.

E.The first is an observation made by the candidate; the second is an assertion that the candidate ultimately opposes.

Wrong. Author is not opposing second.



IMO C but very confused between B and C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 328
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2008, 10:45
IMO C. The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. The candidate agrees that the drug plan would allow individuals significant choice (TRUE) but it is deceptively appealing (unfortunate).

The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs.. This is an assertion because the next sentence strats with "moreover" and instroduces more seertion. "Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time;

Conclusion in the passage is: this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 950
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2008, 10:50
IMO D.
But C is also really close.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2008, 11:02
x97agarwal wrote:
IMO C. The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. The candidate agrees that the drug plan would allow individuals significant choice (TRUE) but it is deceptively appealing (unfortunate).

The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs.. This is an assertion because the next sentence strats with "moreover" and instroduces more seertion. "Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time;

Conclusion in the passage is: this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.



Why B is wonrg? What is the main diff between conclusion and assertion?

Thanks in advance
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 328
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2008, 11:29
rao_1857 wrote:
x97agarwal wrote:
IMO C. The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. The candidate agrees that the drug plan would allow individuals significant choice (TRUE) but it is deceptively appealing (unfortunate).

The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs.. This is an assertion because the next sentence strats with "moreover" and instroduces more seertion. "Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time;

Conclusion in the passage is: this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.



Why B is wonrg? What is the main diff between conclusion and assertion?

Thanks in advance


Good Question Rao. In the first bold face the second part is wrong - it is not an evidence.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3404
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2008, 12:25
i dont think D is correct..the second part is not an observation but an assertion..this is the view of the politician and he wants you to believe it..

therfore C is best
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1593
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2008, 12:36
I am with fresinha .... i went with C because the second boldface is really an assertion
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2008, 12:49
pmenon wrote:
I am with fresinha .... i went with C because the second boldface is really an assertion


Hi All,

Still confused ......

What is the main diff between conclusion and assertion?????
Expert Post
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1425
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 128

Kudos [?]: 625 [0], given: 62

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2012, 06:32
Expert's post
Though I am a bit late, my assessment of C is that nowhere the first boldface has been proclaimed as unfortunate.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 10

Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2012, 08:46
B for me. In C, I don't think the first bold face is unfortunate. B is clearer.
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 484
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 428 [1] , given: 243

Premium Member
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink] New post 12 Nov 2013, 00:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 128
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 110

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2014, 07:45
how can we conclude that first bold face is unfortunate? Can some expert please explain how to eliminate B?
_________________

“Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong.”

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 May 2013
Posts: 325
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '16, IIMA (M)
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 47

Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2014, 07:59
the first BF is a fact about a plan. the author does not acknowledge its benefit......critical of its implementation... not opposed to it.....

the second is BF supports the conclusion by the author.

hence IMO"C".
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug   [#permalink] 22 Jan 2014, 07:59
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Prescription drugs Nihit 11 20 Sep 2008, 11:57
Certain governments subsidize certain basic agricultural Fistail 9 23 Aug 2007, 20:03
Certain governments subsidize certain basic agricultural mm007 5 05 Jan 2007, 23:46
1 The main ingredient in a certain prescription drug capsule kuristar 8 27 May 2006, 08:09
Certain governments subsidize certain basic agricultural WinWinMBA 12 17 May 2005, 15:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.