Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 05:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

political parties

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1111
Location: London
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
political parties [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2007, 09:23
In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.
If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?
(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1467
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: political parties [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2007, 09:58
Ravshonbek wrote:
In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.
If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?
(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.


B.
It came down to B or C for me.
A is wrong because it clearly stated that third party only capture voter from one side. D and E doesn't relate to any information given.
C is wrong as well because the question doesn't say anything about the "new voters".
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1111
Location: London
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2007, 12:47
The OA is D

from Gmat Plus

i do not think the OA is correct
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 256
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2007, 20:29
D - there's neither a reference to the antonym of 'radical' here nor can it be deduced; this cannot be the answer.
E - out of context
C - no reference to new voters; not enough info to agree with the statement
B - there's neither a reference to the voters being divided equally between the 2 parties nor can it be deduced; this cannot be the answer.

I think A is the answer. It has enough info to agree with the statement.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 68
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2007, 06:47
Vote for A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 May 2004
Posts: 313
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2007, 07:54
It is B
Think this through
The argument is saying that the emergence of a third party will hurt ONE of the parties.

B is the only one where that is the case. What B is saying is that before the emergence of the third party, the voters were split about 50/50 between the two candiates. The emergence of the third party causes the voters of only ONE of the previous two parties to move to the third party.

Hence, in situation B, the voters were split 50/50 before the third party canddiate, the third party candiate would take some voters from one of the parties and you may have a 50/25/25 split..no party would get more than half the vote if the premises in the passage are true

A is outside the scope. The passage does not even get into the specifics of the platform.
  [#permalink] 31 Aug 2007, 07:54
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Insurgent political parties that are profoundly dissatisfied vjsharma25 7 12 Mar 2011, 20:27
In a political system with only two major parties, the rianah100 7 01 Dec 2005, 04:52
In a political system with only two major parties, the ps_dahiya 8 21 Nov 2005, 21:40
CR two party political system mahesh004 4 24 Oct 2005, 19:13
Total contributions by individuals to political parties were qhoc0010 13 25 Jan 2005, 12:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

political parties

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.